Table 3 CEC2017 benchmarks functions summary87.
From: Swift Flight Optimizer: a novel bio-inspired optimization algorithm based on swift bird behavior
No | Func | Type | \({f}_{opt}\) |
|---|---|---|---|
\({F}_{1}\) | Shifted and Rotated Bent Cigar function | Uni | 100 |
\({F}_{2}\) | Shifted and Rotated Zakharov function | 200 | |
\({F}_{3}\) | Shifted and Rotated Rosenbrock’s function | Multi | 300 |
\({F}_{4}\) | Shifted and Rotated Rastrigin’s function | 400 | |
\({F}_{5}\) | Shifted and Rotated Expanded Scaffer’s F6 function | 500 | |
\({F}_{6}\) | Shifted and Rotated Lunacek Bi_Rastrigin function | 600 | |
\({F}_{7}\) | Shifted and Rotated Non-Continuous Rastrigin’s function | 700 | |
\({F}_{8}\) | Shifted and Rotated Levy function | 800 | |
\({F}_{9}\) | Shifted and Rotated Schwefel’s function | 900 | |
\({F}_{10}\) | Hybrid function 1 (N = 3) | Hybr | 1000 |
\({F}_{11}\) | Hybrid function 2 (N = 3) | 1100 | |
\({F}_{12}\) | Hybrid function 3 (N = 3) | 1200 | |
\({F}_{13}\) | Hybrid function 4 (N = 4) | 1300 | |
\({F}_{14}\) | Hybrid function 5 (N = 4) | 1400 | |
\({F}_{15}\) | Hybrid function 6 (N = 4) | 1500 | |
\({F}_{16}\) | Hybrid function 6 (N = 5) | 1600 | |
\({F}_{17}\) | Hybrid function 6 (N = 5) | 1700 | |
\({F}_{18}\) | Hybrid function 6 (N = 5) | 1800 | |
\({F}_{19}\) | Hybrid function 6 (N = 6) | 1900 | |
\({F}_{20}\) | Composition function 1 (N = 3) | Comp | 2000 |
\({F}_{21}\) | Composition function 2 (N = 3) | 2100 | |
\({F}_{22}\) | Composition function 3 (N = 4) | 2200 | |
\({F}_{23}\) | Composition function 4 (N = 4) | 2300 | |
\({F}_{24}\) | Composition function 5 (N = 5) | 2400 | |
\({F}_{25}\) | Composition function 6 (N = 5) | 2500 | |
\({F}_{26}\) | Composition function 7 (N = 6) | 2600 | |
\({F}_{27}\) | Composition function 8 (N = 6) | 2700 | |
\({F}_{28}\) | Composition function 9 (N = 3) | 2800 | |
\({F}_{29}\) | Composition function 10 (N = 3) | 2900 | |
\({F}_{30}\) | Composition function 11 (N = 3) | 3000 | |
Seach Range = \({[-100, 100]}^{d}\) |  |  |
