Table 31 Multi-institutional expert assessment results.
Institution/country | Expert count | Overall rating (mean ± SD) | Diagnostic accuracy improvement | Confidence gain | ANOVA F-statistic | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution A (USA) | 3 | 4.69 ± 0.31 | + 16.8% | + 22.1% | – | – |
Institution B (USA) | 2 | 4.74 ± 0.28 | + 17.9% | + 24.2% | – | – |
Institution C (Canada) | 3 | 4.71 ± 0.33 | + 17.2% | + 23.8% | – | – |
Institution D (UK) | 4 | 4.73 ± 0.29 | + 18.1% | + 24.1% | – | – |
Institution E (Germany) | 2 | 4.70 ± 0.35 | + 16.9% | + 22.9% | – | – |
Institution F (Australia) | 3 | 4.75 ± 0.27 | + 17.8% | + 23.5% | – | – |
Institution G (Japan) | 2 | 4.68 ± 0.34 | + 17.0% | + 23.2% | – | – |
Institution H (Brazil) | 1 | 4.72 ± 0.30 | + 17.5% | + 23.7% | – | – |
Overall analysis | 20 | 4.72 ± 0.31 | + 17.4% | + 23.4% | 0.94 | 0.334 |
