Table 1 Efficiency and efficacy metrics of mosquito bloodmeal analysis (MBA) and conventional (Conv.) survey methods to assess the species richness of the study area during the dry and wet seasons. The estimation of these metrics is based on an effort quantified as the total hours invested in field and laboratory work. For rarefied and asymptotic richness comparisons, as well as for required effort to achieve SC = 0.98, only significant differences are highlighted.

From: A comparison of conventional methods and mosquito blood meal analysis to assess vertebrate diversity

Taxa

Season

Detected species

Sample coverage

Rarefied richness

Asymptotic richness

Effort

MBA

Conv.

MBA

Conv.

MBA

Conv.

MBA

Conv.

MBA

Conv.

Birds

Dry

56

74

0.97

0.99

23 (21–25)

74 (69–79)

61 (55–68)

68 (64–72)

825 (652–998)

50 (35–65)

Herpetofauna

Dry

15

40

0.99

0.98

15 (12–18)

37 (33–40)

13 (10–15)

39 (35–43)

338 (111–565)

762 (543–981)

M-L Mammals

Dry

9

14

1.00

1.00

8 (7–9)

14 (13–15)

7 (6–7)

11 (11–12)

69 (54–84)

19 (15–23)

S Mammals

Dry

1

6

1.00

1.00

1

6 (5–7)

1

5 (4–5)

436

103 (61–145)

All Vertebrates

Dry

81

134

0.98

0.99

81 (74–88)

105 (101–110)

75 (69–81)

114 (109–119)

470 (336–604)

820 (690–950)

Birds

Wet

36

39

0.98

0.92

15 (14–16)

39 (34–44)

38 (32–45)

47 (37–58)

251 (163–339)

46 (17–75)

Herpetofauna

Wet

21

20

0.96

0.92

10 (8–11)

20 (17–23)

25 (18–32)

23 (17–28)

302 (219–385)

64 (-18–146)

M-L Mammals

Wet

9

6

1.00

1.00

6 (5–6)

6 (5–7)

7 (6–8)

6 (5–7)

33 (23–43)

12 (1–23)

S Mammals

Wet

NA

2

NA

1.00

NA

2 (1–3)

NA

2 (1–3)

NA

27 (11–43)

All Vertebrates

Wet

66

67

0.98

0.93

50 (46–54)

67 (60–74)

61 (55–67)

76 (65–88)

154 (47–261)

160 (86–234)