Table 3 Experimental design and output response.

From: Multi-criteria decision analysis approach on parametric optimization of abrasive waterjet pocket milling in Ti-6Al-4V alloy

Exp. no.

AM (#)

TS (mm/min)

WP (MPa)

DC (mm)

UC (mm)

SR (µm)

MRR (mm3/min)

1

80

2500

125

0.376

0.643

1.91

1.057

2

80

2500

150

0.783

1.152

2.14

1.853

3

80

2500

175

1.596

1.779

4.68

2.669

4

80

2500

200

2.448

2.734

7.66

4.326

5

80

3000

125

0.246

0.47

1.92

0.718

6

80

3000

150

0.647

0.87

2.08

1.655

7

80

3000

175

1.238

1.992

3.24

2.979

8

80

3000

200

2.003

2.711

6.22

4.191

9

80

3500

125

0.264

0.384

1.99

0.918

10

80

3500

150

0.489

0.881

2.21

1.344

11

80

3500

175

0.955

1.443

3.27

2.388

12

80

3500

200

1.611

2.316

6.14

3.835

13

80

4000

125

0.149

0.436

2.05

0.886

14

80

4000

150

0.343

0.996

2.41

1.213

15

80

4000

175

0.783

1.887

2.44

2.277

16

80

4000

200

1.265

2.768

7.24

4.064

17

100

2500

125

0.492

0.604

1.89

0.864

18

100

2500

150

0.91

1.197

2.87

0.904

19

100

2500

175

1.715

2.103

5.98

2.909

20

100

2500

200

2.394

3.155

7.87

4.918

21

100

3000

125

0.246

0.615

1.62

1.021

22

100

3000

150

0.649

1.219

2.16

1.379

23

100

3000

175

1.26

1.969

3.77

2.689

24

100

3000

200

2.02

2.707

7.39

4.639

25

100

3500

125

0.238

0.526

2.18

0.833

26

100

3500

150

0.522

1.029

2.45

1.224

27

100

3500

175

0.992

1.521

3.65

1.284

28

100

3500

200

1.618

2.45

3.97

4.286

29

100

4000

125

0.194

0.514

2.11

0.480

30

100

4000

150

0.47

0.951

2.51

1.391

31

100

4000

175

0.859

2.17

3.78

2.700

32

100

4000

200

1.297

3.076

4.61

4.145

Back to article page