Table 1 Speckle-based DNN comparison. The table provides a detailed classification report evaluating the performance of the proposed DNN model for shape recognition tasks. The metrics include precision (the proportion of true positive predictions out of all positive predictions), recall (the proportion of true positive predictions out of all actual positives), confidence (the average of precision and recall, indicating overall classification reliability, higher is better), and interpretation (a qualitative assessment based on confidence and complexity, summarizing model performance per class. The results are presented for individual shape classes (e.g., Circle, Rectangle, Triangle), multi-shape versions of these shapes (e.g., multi Circle, multi Rectangle, multi Triangle), mixed shapes (Mix), and a baseline category (White and Black).

From: Visual cortex speckle imaging for shape recognition

Class

Precision

Recall

Confidence

Complexity

Interpretation

Mix

0.993

0.833

0.913

0.184

High confidence, low complexity

M_Rectangle

0.972

0.582

0.777

0.421

Good confidence, moderate complexity

Rectangle

0.522

0.982

0.752

0.472

Good confidence, high complexity

Triangle

0.559

0.921

0.740

0.349

Good confidence, moderate complexity

White

0.374

0.988

0.681

0.617

Moderate confidence, high complexity

Black

0.452

0.759

0.584

0.306

Moderate confidence, moderate complexity

M_Triangle

0.502

0.080

0.291

0.421

Low confidence, moderate complexity

Circle

0.032

0.027

0.030

0.013

Low confidence, low complexity

M_Circle

0.012

0.024

0.018

0.019

Low confidence, low complexity