Abstract
This research focuses on investigating soliton solutions for the space-time fractional modified third-order Korteweg-de Vries equation using the auxiliary equation method. The Korteweg-de Vries equation is renowned for its application in modeling shallow-water waves, oceanographic dynamics, and ion-acoustic waves in plasma. By employing a traveling wave transformation, the fractional-order partial differential equation is converted into a nonlinear ordinary differential equation. This study used conformable derivatives to solve the fractional differential equation. Soliton solutions, including bright, dark, singular, periodic singular, combined bright-dark, and combined dark-singular forms, are derived through the application of auxiliary equation method to the reduced equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In recent years, fractional calculus has gained significant attention owing to its extensive application in diverse fields, including fluid dynamics1,2,3,4, optical fibers5,6,7,8,9, electromagnetics10,11,12,13,14, mathematical physics15,16,17, and plasma physics18,19. Fractional calculus methodologies] and techniques are now widely utilized in various disciplines of modern science and engineering. Several researchers have explored its potential in modeling and control theory, demonstrating its effectiveness in solving complex problems24,25,26,27,28. Fractional partial differential equations (PDEs) represent a generalized form of nonlinear PDEs that play a fundamental role in investigating nonlinear phenomena in the applied sciences29,30,31,32. These equations have numerous applications in optics, aerodynamics, plasma physics, hydrodynamics, electrochemistry, fluid mechanics, and other scientific and engineering domains.
A particularly significant nonlinear PDE is the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation that describes long-wave motion in shallow water, quantum mechanics, and one-dimensional nonlinear lattices33,34,35,36,37,38. The KdV equation has been extensively used in the modeling of physical phenomena, such as blood pressure wave propagation, tidal waves, long surface waves, wave transmission in shallow water channels, and internal gravity waves in oceanic systems. In addition, a German mathematician investigated the application of the KdV equation to describe wave propagation within electromagnetic fields39,40,41. In physics, water waves play a crucial role in the study of nonlinear dispersive waves and solitons. Notably, researchers such as KdV have extensively analyzed the KdV equation, identifying it as a fundamental model for shallow water waves in streams and oceans, thereby forming the basis for the concept of solitary waves42,43,44.
The importance of fractional PDEs in the applied sciences lies in their ability to provide both exact and numerical solutions. Various advanced analytical techniques have been developed to determine exact solutions, including the simple equation method45, the \(\exp\)-function method46,47, \(\exp (-z(\xi ))\)-expansion method48, the modified simple equation method49, the tri-prong scheme50, the extended mapping method51, the auxiliary equation (NAE) method52, and the modified simple equation method53, among others54,55,56,57.
In this study, the NAE method52 is applied to examine the KdV equation, which is essential for analyzing short waves and shallow water waves in dispersive media. The NAE method is regarded as a generalized framework from which several other methods can be derived under specific conditions, including the functional variable method58 and the first integral method59. The findings of this research hold significant relevance for various practical applications, including wave dynamics, optics, plasma physics, fluid mechanics, and ocean engineering. Soliton and wave solutions play a fundamental role in understanding surface water waves, with applications in coastal engineering, shipbuilding, and wave prediction. Additionally, some of the obtained traveling wave solutions are particularly useful in ocean engineering, addressing phenomena such as ship-induced waves, storm-generated ocean waves, traveling wave propagation, and wave breaking along shorelines.
This paper is organized into six sections. Section 1 introduces the study. Section 2 outlines the definition and key properties of conformable fractional derivatives. The NAE methodology is explained in Section 3. Section 4 describes the application of the proposed approach. A graphical analysis is provided in Section 5, and the final conclusions are presented in Section 6.
Conformal derivative and its properties
Numerous definitions of fractional derivatives have been introduced in the literature, including Caputo and Riemann-Liouville formulations60,61. However, a particularly noteworthy definition, offering both a geometric perspective on fractional derivatives and a complex fractional transformation, was presented by Khalil et al.62 and further investigated by He et al.63. The conformable fractional derivative is designed to extend the classical concept of differentiation to fractional orders while preserving many fundamental properties, such as linearity, product rules, and chain rules. Physically, it can be interpreted as a tool for modeling processes exhibiting memory and hereditary properties with a degree of locality, bridging the gap between integer-order calculus and more complex fractional definitions. This makes it especially suitable for describing anomalous diffusion, viscoelastic behavior, and other phenomena in which non-integer dynamics play a crucial role. In our study, the conformable derivative provides a meaningful framework to capture such intermediate behaviors in the system under investigation, offering both analytical tractability and physical relevance. The concept of conformable fractional derivative, originally proposed by Khalil et al.62, is formulated as follows:
Definition 2.1
Suppose
be a function. Then conformable derivative of g of \(\alpha 's\) order is defined by
in which \(t>0\) and \(\sigma _1 \in (0,1]\).
Some properties for conformable derivative are reported as follow:
Theorem 2.1
Suppose if \(0 < \omega \le 1\) and assume g(t) and h(t) are differentiable of \(\omega 's\) order at \(t> 0\), then
1: \(D^\omega _t (t^\beta )=\beta t^{\beta -\omega }\), for all \(\beta \in \mathbb {R}.\)
2: \(D^\omega _t (c)=0\), for all constants.
3: \(D^\omega _t (\phi g(t))=\phi D^\omega _t (g(t))\), where \(\phi\) is constant.
4: \(D^\omega _t (\phi g(t)+\psi h(t))=\phi D^\omega _t(g(t))+\psi D^\omega _t(h(t))\), for all \(\phi ,\psi \in \mathbb {R}.\)
5: \(D^\omega _t(g(t)\times h(t))=h(t)\times D^\omega _t(g(t))+g(t) \times D^\omega _t(h(t)),\)
6: \(D^\omega _t\bigg (\frac{g(t)}{h(t)}\bigg )=\frac{h(t)D^\omega _t (g(t))-g(t)D^\omega _t (h(t))}{h^2(t)}\),
7: \(D^\omega _t g(t)=t^{1-\omega }\frac{dg}{dt}\),
8: \(D^{\omega }_t(g(t)\circ h(t))=t^{1-\omega }h^{\prime }(t)g^{\prime }(h(t)).\)
Methodology of the auxiliary equation method
A general form of a nonlinear PDE can be represented as follows
where \(P\) is a polynomial function involving \(\mathcal {R}\) and its derivatives with respect to the independent variables \(x\) and \(t\).
Step: 1 Consider defining a new dependent \(\psi\) variable as follows
Substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (2), the resulting ordinary differential equation (ODE) is obtained as follows
Step: 2 Consider the solution of Eq. (4) in the following form
while also satisfying the corresponding auxiliary equations.
where \(b_i\) are constants that will be determined later.
Step: 3 To determine the value of \(k\) in Eq. (5), the balancing procedure is applied, where the highest-order nonlinear term is equated with the highest-order derivative.
Step: 4 By incorporating Eq (5) and Eq (6) into Eq (4), and subsequently gathering the coefficients of various powers of \(\mathcal {L}^{p(\psi )}\) (\(i = 0,1,2,3 \dots\)), we establish a system of algebraic equations by equating all coefficients to zero. The resulting system can be efficiently solved using Maple 2023 software.
Step: 5 The possible forms of solutions for Eq (6) can be determined as follows
Case:1 When \(\sigma ^2_3-\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Case:2 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Case:3 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Case: 4 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Case: 5 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Case: 6 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Case: 7 When \(\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _3=0\)
Case: 8 When \(\sigma _3=0\) and \(\sigma _1=-\sigma _2\)
Case: 9 When \(\sigma _3^2=\sigma _1\sigma _2\)
Case: 10 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _1=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _2=0\)
Case: 11 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _2=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _1=0\)
Case: 12 When \(2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Case: 13 When \(-2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Case: 14 When \(\sigma _1=0\)
Case: 15 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _3=\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Case: 16 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _2\), \(\sigma _3=0\)
Case: 17 When \(\sigma _2=0\)
Step: 6 By substituting all the values of \(\mathcal {L}^{p(\psi )}\) from Step 5 into Eq (5), the corresponding results for Eq (2) are obtained.
Utilization of the proposed methodology
The space-time fractional modified third-order KDV equation64 is expressed as follows
This equation serves as an important mathematical model for describing nonlinear wave propagation phenomena in various physical systems where memory effects and anomalous diffusion are present. Applications include shallow water waves, plasma physics, and nonlinear lattice dynamics, where wave behavior deviates from classical models due to fractional dynamics. The conformable fractional derivative introduces a flexible parameter that captures intermediate dynamics between classical integer-order and more complex fractional-order behaviors, enabling more accurate modeling of wave attenuation and dispersion in complex media. Thus, this study not only contributes to the theoretical understanding of fractional nonlinear wave equations but also has potential implications for improving predictive models in fluid mechanics, optics, and other engineering fields where such wave phenomena are observed. By utilizing Eq (3), Eq (31) can be reformulated into the following ODE.
By performing integration and assuming the constant of integration to be zero, Eq (32) simplifies to
By applying the balancing principle, we obtain \(n = 1\). Consequently, the solution (5) can be expressed as
Substituting Eq (34) and its derivatives into Eq (33) and equating the coefficients of \(\mathcal {L}^{p(\psi )}\) yield a system of algebraic equations. The solutions to the obtained system are as follows.
Set-1
Based on Eq (34), the traveling wave solutions of Eq (32) corresponding to the obtained results are given as follows
By employing the solutions given in Eq (7) through Eq (30), the obtained solutions are as follows.
Family:1 When \(\sigma ^2_3-\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family:2 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family:3 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 4 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 5 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 6 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 7 When \(\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _3=0\)
Family: 8 When \(\sigma _3=0\) and \(\sigma _1=-\sigma _2\)
Family: 9 When \(\sigma _3^2=\sigma _1\sigma _2\)
Family: 10 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _1=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _2=0\)
Family: 11 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _2=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _1=0\)
Family: 12 When \(2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Family: 13 When \(-2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Family: 14 When \(\sigma _1=0\)
Family: 15 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _3=\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family: 16 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _2\), \(\sigma _3=0\)
Family: 17 When \(\sigma _2=0\)
where \(\psi\) is as defined in (3).
Set-2
Now, by substituting the second set into Eq (34), we obtain
By employing the solutions given in Eq (7) through Eq (30), the obtained solutions are as follows.
Family:18 When \(\sigma ^2_3-\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family:19 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family:20 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 21 When \(\sigma _3^2+\sigma _1\sigma _2<0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 22 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2<0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 23 When \(\sigma _3^2-\sigma _1^2>0\) and \(\sigma _2\ne -\sigma _1\)
Family: 24 When \(\sigma _1\sigma _2>0\), \(\sigma _2\ne 0\) and \(\sigma _3=0\)
Family: 25 When \(\sigma _3=0\) and \(\sigma _1=-\sigma _2\)
Family: 26 When \(\sigma _3^2=\sigma _1\sigma _2\)
Family: 27 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _1=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _2=0\)
Family: 28 When \(\sigma _3=\kappa\), \(\sigma _2=2\kappa\) and \(\sigma _1=0\)
Family: 29 When \(2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Family: 30 When \(-2\sigma _3=\sigma _1+\sigma _2\)
Family: 31 When \(\sigma _1=0\)
Family: 32 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _3=\sigma _2\ne 0\)
Family: 33 When \(\sigma _1=\sigma _2\), \(\sigma _3=0\)
Family: 34 When \(\sigma _2=0\)
where \(\psi\) is defined in (3).
Physical nature of soliton and other solutions
This section presents the physical interpretation of various soliton solutions in three-dimensional (3D), two-dimensional (2D), and contour plots using Mathematica 14.1. The analyzed solutions exhibited diverse structural forms, including dark, bright, mixed bright-dark, combined dark-singular, singular, and periodic singular solitons. These graphical representations were generated using appropriate parameter values that satisfied the conditions for all the considered cases 1-7.
Figures 1 and 2 show the dynamics of singular periodic soliton waves for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for the parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =0.2, -10\le x \le 10.\)
Figure 3 shows the dynamics of dark soliton wave for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =0.2, -10\le x \le 10.\)
Figure 4 shows the dynamics of singular soliton wave for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =0.2, -10\le x \le 10.\)
Figure 5 shows the exponential dynamics of solitary waves for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for the parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =1, -10\le x \le 10.\)
Figure 6 shows the dynamics of singular solitary waves for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for the parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =1, -10\le x \le 10.\)
Figure 7 shows the dynamics of singular periodic soliton waves for the values of the fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\) and for the parameters \(\mu =0.01,\nu =0.5,\sigma _1=1.1,\sigma _2=1.2,\sigma _3=0.5,\sigma =1, -10\le x \le 10.\) Similarly, the dynamics of the other solutions can be followed.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{1}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{2}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{3}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{4}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{17}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{18}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Physical dynamics of soliton solution \(|\mathcal {R}_{23}(x,t)|\) of space-time fractional modified KdV Eq (31): (a) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values \(t=0.0,~t=2.0,t=3.0\), (b) Two-dimensional dynamics for the values of fractional parameter \(\omega =0.6,~\omega =0.8,\omega =1.0\), and (c) Three-dimensional dynamics.
Conclusions
In summary, this study constructs soliton solutions for the space-time fractional modified third-order KdV Eq. (31) by utilizing the NAE method. The derived solutions encompass trigonometric, rational, polynomial, exponential, and hyperbolic functions that incorporate multiple free parameters. Their validity was confirmed through direct substitution into the original equation. To further analyze the dynamical properties of these solutions, 2D, 3D, and contour plots were presented. In the literature, the authors64 employed two reliable analytical techniques, namely the \((\frac{G'}{G})\)-expansion method and the improved \((\frac{G'}{G})\)-expansion method, to obtain soliton solutions for the KdV Eq. (31). Rehman et al.65 utilized the Sardar sub-equation method to analyze the same model. Nazari66 utilized modified \((G'/G)\)-expansion method to derive singular solutions. A comparative analysis of our findings with those of these studies indicates that our work extends certain classes of soliton solutions for the space-time fractional modified third-order KdV Eq. (31). These findings highlight the efficiency, robustness, and simplicity of the NAE method. One of its major advantages is its applicability to nonlinear partial differential equations, in which most of the obtained solutions satisfy the given model. Furthermore, the method effectively reduces the computational complexity and enhances the efficiency by minimizing lengthy calculations. The comparison is also given by Table 1. In the future, we will be interested in applying machine learning tools67,68,69,70,71 to the same model.
The various solution types obtained from nonlinear PDEs20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73 have broad applicability across physical sciences and engineering. Bright solitons are relevant to optical fiber communications and Bose–Einstein condensates, where they describe localized energy packets that maintain their shape over long distances. Dark solitons model intensity dips on a continuous background in nonlinear optics, plasma waves, and shallow water dynamics. Periodic and periodic singular solutions describe wave trains or modulated structures in fluids, plasmas, and photonic crystals. Singular solutions can represent wave breaking, shock formation, or localized energy blow-up in nonlinear media. Combined dark–singular waves are applicable to systems exhibiting mixed localized-depression and singular behavior, such as certain plasma instabilities or nonlinear metamaterials. Exponential-type solutions arise in describing rapidly decaying structures or transition layers in reaction–diffusion systems and quantum field models. Collectively, these diverse wave forms are important for modeling nonlinear propagation phenomena, stability regimes, and energy localization in contexts ranging from nonlinear optics and fluid mechanics to plasma physics and condensed matter systems.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Yang, Z. et al. Column-hemispherical penetration grouting mechanism for Newtonian fluid considering the tortuosity of porous media. Processes 11(6), 1737 (2023).
Zhang, T., Xu, S., Zhang, W. New approach to feedback stabilization of linear discrete time-varying stochastic systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. (2024).
Zhang, H. H. et al. 5G base station antenna array with heatsink radome. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 72(3), 2270–8 (2024).
Yang, Z. et al. Column penetration and diffusion mechanism of Bingham fluid considering displacement effect. Appl. Sci. 12(11), 5362 (2022).
Wang, K. J. An effective computational approach to the local fractional low-pass electrical transmission lines model. Alex. Eng. J. 110, 629–35 (2025).
Wang, K. J. On a High-pass filter described by local fractional derivative. Fractals 28(03), 2050031 (2020).
Zhu, B., Xu, J., Li, Y., Wang, T., Xiong, K., Lee, C., Yang, X., Shiiba, M., Takeuchi, S., Zhou, Q., Shung, K. K. Micro-particle manipulation by single beam acoustic tweezers based on hydrothermal PZT thick film. AIP Adv. 6(3). (2016).
Zhu, B. et al. KNN-based single crystal high frequency transducer for intravascular photoacoustic imaging. In 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) (ed. Zhu, B.) 1–4 (IEEE, 2017).
Zhu, B. P. et al. Sol-gel derived PMN-PT thick films for high frequency ultrasound linear array applications. Ceramics Int. 39(8), 8709–14 (2013).
Sui, X., Gao, H., Sun, Y., Chen, Q. & Gu, G. Infrared super-resolution imaging method based on retina micro-motion. Infrared Phys. Technol. 60, 340–5 (2013).
Sui, X., Chen, Q., Gu, G. & Shen, X. Infrared super-resolution imaging based on compressed sensing. Infrared Phys. Technol. 63, 119–24 (2014).
Ni, Z. L., Ma, J. S., Liu, Y., Li, B. H., Nazarov, A. A., Li, H., Yuan, Z. P., Ling, Z. C. & Wang, X. X. Numerical Analysis of Ultrasonic Spot Welding of Cu/Cu Joints. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 1-2 (2025).
Behera, S. Analysis of traveling wave solutions of two space-time nonlinear fractional differential equations by the first-integral method. Modern Phys. Lett. B 38(04), 2350247 (2024).
Behera, S. & Aljahdaly, N. H. Nonlinear evolution equations and their traveling wave solutions in fluid media by modified analytical method. Pramana 97(3), 130 (2023).
Xiubao, S., Lianfa, B., Chen, Q. & Gu, G. Algorithm for eliminating stripe noise in infrared image. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 31(2), 106–12 (2012).
Sui, X., Chen, Q. & Gu, G. A novel non-uniformity evaluation metric of infrared imaging system. Infrared Phys. Technol. 60, 155–60 (2013).
Sui, X., Chen, Q. & Gu, G. Micro-scanning system using flat optics for resolution improvement of infrared images. Optik 124(16), 2292–7 (2013).
Sui, X., Bai, L., Chen, Q. & Gu, G. Influencing factors of microscanning performance based on flat optical component. Chin. Opt. Lett. 9(5), 052302 (2011).
Yang, Z., Qian, S. & Hou, K. Time-dependent behavior characteristics of power-law cement grouts applied in geotechnical engineering. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(22), 1017–23 (2015).
Wang, K. J. & Liu, J. H. On the zero state-response of the \(\tau\)-order RC circuit within the local fractional calculus. COMPEL Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng. 42(6), 1641–53 (2023).
Wang, K. J., Liu, X. L., Wang, W. D., Li, S., & Zhu, H. W. Novel singular and non-singular complexiton, interaction wave and the complex multi-soliton solutions to the generalized nonlinear evolution equation. Modern Phys. Lett. B 2550135. (2025).
Wang, K. J. et al. Lump wave, breather wave and other abundant wave solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Sawada-Kotera-Kadomtsev Petviashvili equation of fluid mechanics. Pramana 99(1), 1–2 (2025).
Wang, K. J. Resonant multiple wave, periodic wave and interaction solutions of the new extended (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 111(17), 16427–39 (2023).
Yang, Z. Q., Hou, K. P. & Guo, T. T. Study on the effects of different water-cement ratios on the flow pattern properties of cement grouts. Appl. Mech. Mater. 71, 1264–7 (2011).
Yang, Z. Q., Hou, K. P., Cheng, Y. & Yang, B. Study of column-hemispherical penetration grouting mechanism based on power-law fluid. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 33(2), 3840–6 (2014).
Zhiquan, Y., Xiangdong, N., Kepeng, H., Wei, L. & Yanhui, G. Relationships between water-cement ratio and rheological characteristics of power-law cement grouts. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(13), 5825–31 (2015).
Baleanu, D., Diethelm, K., Scalas, E., & Trujillo, J. J. Fractional calculus: models and numerical methods. World Scientific (2012).
Hamid, M., Zubair, T., Usman, M. & Haq, R. U. Numerical investigation of fractional-order unsteady natural convective radiating flow of nanofluid in a vertical channel. AIMS Math. 4(5), 1416–29 (2019).
Biswas, A. et al. Optical solitons for Lakshmanan–Porsezian-Daniel model by modified simple equation method. Optik 160, 24–32 (2018).
Ekici, M. et al. Solitons in optical metamaterials with fractional temporal evolution. Optik 127(22), 10879–97 (2016).
Behera, S., Mohanty, S. & Virdi, J. P. Analytical solutions and mathematical simulation of traveling wave solutions to fractional order nonlinear equations. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 8, 100535 (2023).
Behera, S. & Aljahdaly, N. H. Soliton solutions of nonlinear geophysical KdV equation via two analytical methods. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63(5), 107 (2024).
Kilbas, A. A., Srivastava, H. M. & Trujillo, J. J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations (Elsevier, 2006).
Petráš, I. Fractional-order nonlinear systems: modeling, analysis and simulation. Springer Science and Business Media (2011).
Tarasov, V. E. Fractional dynamics: applications of fractional calculus to dynamics of particles, fields and media. Springer Science and Business Media (2011).
Guo, S., Mei, L., He, Y. & Li, Y. Time-fractional Schamel-KdV equation for dust-ion-acoustic waves in pair-ion plasma with trapped electrons and opposite polarity dust grains. Phys. Lett. A 380(9–10), 1031–6 (2016).
Choi, J. H., Kim, H. & Sakthivel, R. Exact solution of the Wick-type stochastic fractional coupled KdV equations. J. Math. Chem. 52, 2482–93 (2014).
Gencoglu, M. T., Baskonus, H. M., Bulut, H. Numerical simulations to the nonlinear model of interpersonal relationships with time fractional derivative. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1798, No. 1, p. 020103). AIP Publishing LLC. (2017)
Akinyemi, L. M. Inc, MMA Khater. H. Rezazadeh. Opt. Quant. Elect.54(3), 1–5 (2022).
Zafar, A., Shakeel, M., Ali, A., Akinyemi, L. & Rezazadeh, H. Optical solitons of nonlinear complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two modified expansion schemes. Opt. Quantum Electron. 54, 1–5 (2022).
Ahmad, I., Ahmad, H., Inc, M., Rezazadeh, H., Akbar, M. A., Khater, M. M., Akinyemi, L., Jhangeer, A. Solution of fractional-order Korteweg-de Vries and Burgers’ equations utilizing local meshless method. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2021).
Borah, P. & Hassan, M. Scattering of water waves by a wave energy device consisting of a pair of co-axial cylinders in a uniform water having finite channel width. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 6(3), 276–84 (2021).
Sasmal, A. & De, S. Propagation of oblique water waves by an asymmetric trench in the presence of surface tension. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 6(2), 206–214 (2021).
Ali, A. & Seadawy, A. R. Dispersive soliton solutions for shallow water wave system and modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equations via applications of mathematical methods. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 6(1), 85–98 (2021).
Lu, D., Seadawy, A. & Arshad, M. Applications of extended simple equation method on unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Optik 140, 136–44 (2017).
Guner, O. & Atik, H. Soliton solution of fractional-order nonlinear differential equations based on the exp-function method. Optik 127(20), 10076–83 (2016).
Irshad, A., Usman, M. & Mohyud-Din, S. T. Exp-function method for simplified modified Camassa-Holm equation. Int. J. Modern Math. Sci. 4(3), 146–55 (2012).
Lu, D., Yue, C., Arshad, M. Traveling wave solutions of space-time fractional generalized fifth-order KdV equation. Adv. Math. Phys. 2017 (2017).
Arshad, M., Seadawy, A. R. & Lu, D. Exact bright-dark solitary wave solutions of the higher-order cubic–quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its stability. Optik 138, 40–9 (2017).
Hosseini, M. M., Ghaneai, H., Mohyud-Din, S. T. & Usman, M. Tri-prong scheme for regularized long wave equation. J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 20, 68–77 (2016).
Arshad, M., Seadawy, A. R., Lu, D. & Jun, W. Optical soliton solutions of unstable nonlinear Schröodinger dynamical equation and stability analysis with applications. Optik 157, 597–605 (2018).
Zhang, S. A generalized auxiliary equation method and its application to (2+ 1)-dimensional Korteweg-de Vries equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 54(7–8), 1028–38 (2007).
Chen, C. Singular solitons of Biswas-Arshed equation by the modified simple equation method. Optik 184, 412–20 (2019).
Zeid, S. S. Approximation methods for solving fractional equations. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 125, 171–93 (2019).
Arshad, M., Lu, D., Rehman, M. U., Ahmed, I. & Sultan, A. M. Optical solitary wave and elliptic function solutions of the Fokas-Lenells equation in the presence of perturbation terms and its modulation instability. Phys. Scr. 94(10), 105202 (2019).
Al-Amr, M. O., Rezazadeh, H., Ali, K. K. & Korkmazki, A. N1-soliton solution for Schrödinger equation with competing weakly nonlocal and parabolic law nonlinearities. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72(6), 065503 (2020).
Rasheed, N. M., Al-Amr, M. O., Az-Zo’bi, E. A., Tashtoush, M. A. & Akinyemi, L. Stable optical solitons for the Higher-order Non-Kerr NLSE via the modified simple equation method. Mathematics 9(16), 1986 (2021).
Eslami, M. & Mirzazadeh, M. Functional variable method to study nonlinear evolution equations. Open Eng. 3(3), 451–8 (2013).
Mirzazadeh, M. & Eslami, M. Exact solutions of the Kudryashov-Sinelshchikov equation and nonlinear telegraph equation via the first integral method. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 17(4), 481–8 (2012).
Jumarie, G. On the fractional solution of the equation f (x+ y)= f (x) f (y) and its application to fractional Laplace’s transform. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(4), 1625–43 (2012).
Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M. A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2): 73-85.
Khalil, R., Al Horani, M., Yousef, A. & Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 264, 65–70 (2014).
He, J. H., Elagan, S. K. & Li, Z. B. Geometrical explanation of the fractional complex transform and derivative chain rule for fractional calculus. Phys. Lett. A 376(4), 257–9 (2012).
Sahoo, S. & Ray, S. S. Solitary wave solutions for the time fractional third-order modified KdV equation using two reliable techniques: (\(\frac{G^{\prime }}{G}\))-expansion method and improved (\(\frac{G^{\prime }}{G}\))-expansion method. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 448, 265–82 (2016).
Rehman, H. U., Inc, M., Asjad, M. I., Habib, A., Munir, Q. New soliton solutions for the space-time fractional modified third order Korteweg-de Vries equation. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2022).
Nazari-Golshan, A. Derivation and solution of space fractional modified Korteweg de Vries equation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 79, 104904 (2019).
Yu, Y. et al. CrowdFPN: crowd counting via scale-enhanced and location-aware feature pyramid network. Appl. Intell. 55(5), 1–3 (2025).
Zheng, D., Cao, X. Provably efficient service function chain embedding and protection in edge networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (2024).
Fei, R. et al. Deep core node information embedding on networks with missing edges for community detection. Inf. Sci. 707, 122039 (2025).
Li, J., Zhu, X., Feng, C., Wen, M. & Zhang, Y. A simple and efficient three-dimensional spring element model for pore seepage problems. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elements 176, 106225 (2025).
Guan, Y., Cui, Z. & Zhou, W. Reconstruction in off-axis digital holography based on hybrid clustering and the fractional Fourier transform. Opt. Laser Technol. 186, 112622 (2025).
Liang, Y. H., Wang, K. J. Dynamics of the new exact wave solutions to the local fractional Vakhnenko-Parkes equation. Fractals. (2025).
Wang, K. J. & Li, M. Variational principle of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation with fractal derivatives. Axioms 14(5), 376 (2025).
Funding
The authors extend their appreciation to Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (NBU-CRP-2025-1266).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Writing original draft, Akhtar Hussain; Writing review and editing, Akhtar Hussain., Tarek F. Ibrahim, Abaker A. Hassaballa, and Fathea M. Osman Birkea; Methodology, Akhtar Hussain, and Tarek F. Ibrahim; Software, Akhtar Hussain; Herbert Mukalazi; Supervision, Tarek F. Ibrahim, Herbert Mukalazi; Project administration, Tarek F. Ibrahim, M. Sh.Yahya; Visualization, Akhtar Hussain, M. Sh.Yahya, Herbert Mukalazi, and Fathea M. Osman Birkea; Conceptualization, Akhtar Hussain; Formal analysis, Abaker A. Hassaballa, M. Sh.Yahya, and Akhtar Hussain.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, A., Ibrahim, T.F., Birkea, F.M.O. et al. Abundant different types of soliton solutions for fractional modified KdV equation using auxiliary equation method. Sci Rep 15, 43518 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26779-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26779-3









