Table 1 Comparison of Elemental Percentages in Ni-TEMPO-MOF Determined by XPS and EDS.

From: Structural functionalization of TEMPO modified Ni-MOF for electrocatalytic applications

Element

XPS Atomic Percentage (%)

EDS Atomic Percentage (%)

Comparative Explanation

C

46.73

34.25

Higher carbon signal in XPS due to organic ligands and TEMPO modification layer

N

6.85

3.41

Nitrogen proportion is higher in XPS, confirming the successful surface incorporation of TEMPO groups

O

25.12

28.67

Oxygen content slightly higher in EDS, possibly due to oxide contributions from the copper foam substrate

Ni

21.3

33.67

Lower Ni proportion in XPS due to limited probing depth compared to bulk-sensitive EDS