Table 10 Performance comparison of HMOA-GNN and existing CCFD methods on Simulated Credit Card Transactions dataset.
Ref | Algorithm | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zou et al.49 | DAE | 0.8790 | 0.1809 | 0.8226 | 0.2965 | 0.9293 |
Pang et al.50 | DevNet | 0.8116 | 0.1339 | 0.9274 | 0.2340 | 0.9210 |
Ileberi et al.51 | GA-RF | 0.9815 | 0.7551 | 0.5968 | 0.6667 | 0.9504 |
Ni et al.27 | SOBT | 0.9800 | 0.9348 | 0.4300 | 0.5890 | 0.9760 |
Xiang et al.52 | GTAN | 0.8838 | 0.6581 | 0.4063 | 0.5535 | 0.8379 |
Chang et al.53 | TFD | 0.9807 | 0.8889 | 0.4800 | 0.6234 | 0.9672 |
Ours | HMOA-GNN | 0.9815 | 0.7049 | 0.6935 | 0.6992 | 0.9177 |