Table 2 Comparative data of evaluation indexes of training set and test set of each model.
Train | Test | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stations | Models | MAE | MSE | RMSE | R2 | MAE | MSE | RMSE | R2 |
A | LSTM | 0.399 | 0.285 | 0.534 | 0.843 | 0.306 | 0.171 | 0.413 | 0.735 |
SVR | 0.307 | 0.184 | 0.429 | 0.898 | 0.259 | 0.124 | 0.353 | 0.807 | |
MLP | 0.437 | 0.340 | 0.583 | 0.812 | 0.354 | 0.214 | 0.463 | 0.668 | |
C-LSTM | 0.258 | 0.114 | 0.337 | 0.937 | 0.264 | 0.107 | 0.327 | 0.834 | |
C-SVR | 0.235 | 0.100 | 0.317 | 0.945 | 0.205 | 0.073 | 0.269 | 0.887 | |
C-MLP | 0.213 | 0.085 | 0.292 | 0.953 | 0.192 | 0.068 | 0.260 | 0.895 | |
Optimal ensemble | 0.210 | 0.084 | 0.290 | 0.954 | 0.186 | 0.065 | 0.256 | 0.898 | |
B | LSTM | 0.267 | 0.186 | 0.431 | 0.912 | 0.232 | 0.122 | 0.350 | 0.929 |
SVR | 0.220 | 0.146 | 0.382 | 0.931 | 0.198 | 0.109 | 0.331 | 0.936 | |
MLP | 0.270 | 0.185 | 0.430 | 0.912 | 0.220 | 0.115 | 0.338 | 0.933 | |
C-LSTM | 0.245 | 0.097 | 0.312 | 0.954 | 0.209 | 0.074 | 0.272 | 0.957 | |
C-SVR | 0.170 | 0.065 | 0.255 | 0.969 | 0.163 | 0.054 | 0.232 | 0.969 | |
C-MLP | 0.169 | 0.063 | 0.250 | 0.970 | 0.164 | 0.054 | 0.232 | 0.969 | |
Optimal ensemble | 0.158 | 0.059 | 0.243 | 0.972 | 0.138 | 0.046 | 0.214 | 0.973 | |