Table 3 Linguistic terms and corresponding CPFSs.
From: Smart system for forecasting financial outcomes and supporting strategic choices
Linguistic term | Abbreviation | CPiFVs |
|---|---|---|
Excellent performance | EP | (\(0.92 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{5\pi }{3}}\), \(0.03 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{20}}\), \(0.05 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{10}}\)) |
Very good performance | VGP | (\(0.83 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{8\pi }{5}}\), \(0.06 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{12}}\), \(0.09 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{6}}\)) |
Good performance | GP | (\(0.74 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{3\pi }{2}}\), \(0.09 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{7}}\), \(0.14 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{4}}\)) |
Fair performance | FP | (\(0.64 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{4\pi }{3}}\), \(0.13 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{8}}\), \(0.19 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{3}}\)) |
Marginal performance | MP | (\(0.53 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{7\pi }{6}}\), \(0.16 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{6}}\), \(0.23 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{4\pi }{9}}\)) |
Poor performance | PP | (\(0.42 \textrm{e}^{\iota \pi }\), \(0.19 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{3}}\), \(0.31 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{2}}\)) |
Very poor performance | VPP | (\(0.31 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{5\pi }{6}}\), \(0.24 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{\pi }{5}}\), \(0.37 \textrm{e}^{\iota \frac{5\pi }{8}}\)) |