Table 19 The sensitivity analysis of the proposed scheme independently and without considering the simultaneous impact of other parameters in the eighth scenario’ structure (The second analysis).
PAs Performance | Average Accuracy of the PAs as Algorithm Outputs (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in the Fundamental Parameters | Fault Detection | FT and FP Detection | Fault Location | ||||
DNN Type 1 | DNN Type 2 | DNN Type 1 | DNN Type 2 | DNN Type 1 | DNN Type 2 | ||
Measurements number | 4 | 96.64 | 97.15 | 96.11 | 96.95 | 95.33 | 96.28 |
6 | 98.59 | 99.80 | 98.38 | 99.70 | 97.40 | 98.31 | |
10 | 98.55 | 99.85 | 98.41 | 99.88 | 98.54 | 98.90 | |
14 | 98.85 | 99.93 | 98.36 | 99.90 | 98.48 | 98.92 | |
Laterals number in each line without updating the DNNs parameters | 0 | 98.66 | 99.895 | 98.55 | 99.79 | 97.66 | 98.425 |
1 | 98.61 | 99.81 | 98.59 | 99.68 | 97.62 | 98.31 | |
2 | 98.25 | 99.57 | 98.10 | 99.15 | 97.25 | 98.38 | |
3 | 97.50 | 98.92 | 98.18 | 98.61 | 97.29 | 97.69 | |
Measurements locations (for fault at laterals) | Lines | 97.25 | 98.15 | 96.97 | 97.84 | 95.54 | 96.89 |
Laterals | 98.09 | 99.14 | 98.01 | 99.24 | 97.41 | 98.08 | |
How to use measurements data | Directly | 98.75 | 99.91 | 99.04 | 99.82 | 97.86 | 98.39 |
Differentially | 96.15 | 97.50 | 96.03 | 97.48 | 95.41 | 96.87 | |
