Table 7 Ablation study results showing the impact of different components (RDMS, Transform, and HS-CBAM-FPN) on model performance across two datasets.

From: Multi scale deep learning quantifies Ki67 index in breast cancer histopathology images

Dataset

RDMS

Transform

HS-CBAM-FPN

Avg. F1 (%)

SHIDC-BC-Ki-67

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

79.89

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

80.24

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

81.73

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

81.45

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

82.89

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

82.41

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

84.45

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

85.79

BCData

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

79.25

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

79.89

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

81.05

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

81.23

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

82.71

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

83.12

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

83.79

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

84.25

  1. The best configuration for each dataset is highlighted in bold.