Table 2 Multimodal classification performance using different input features.

From: Machine learning approach using electrochemical immunosensor data for precise classification of Opisthorchis viverrini infection

ML classifier

Clinical features

Peak current changes

All 9 features

Selected 3 features

Accuracy (%)

AUC

Accuracy (%)

AUC

Accuracy (%)

AUC

Accuracy (%)

AUC

Decision tree

57.01

0.56

81.30

0.84

89.72

0.85

90.65

0.86

(0.55–0.59)

(0.52–0.61)

(0.77–0.85)

(0.83–0.86)

(0.84–0.93)

(0.82–0.88)

(0.89–0.91)

(0.83–0.88)

k-nearest neighbors

62.61

0.65

79.43

0.85

81.31

0.89

84.11

0.87

(0.59–0.66)

(0.63–0.69)

(0.77–0.82)

(0.83–0.86)

(0.77–0.84)

(0.88–0.89)

(0.83–0.88)

(0.85–0.90)

AdaBoost

57.94

0.64

81.30

0.87

87.85

0.88

90.65

0.88

(0.57–0.60)

(0.61–0.67)

(0.79–0.83)

(0.86–0.88)

(0.85–0.89)

(0.87–0.90)

(0.89–0.91)

(0.84–0.92)

Naïve Bayes

55.14

0.58

83.48

0.89

78.50

0.87

82.24

0.83

(0.52–0.55)

(0.56–0.60)

(0.79–0.87)

(0.85–0.93)

(0.75–0.81)

(0.83–0.91)

(0.79–0.86)

(0.81–0.86)

Random forest

44.58

0.59

76.63

0.83

85.05

0.90

85.98

0.90

(0.42–0.46)

(0.55–0.63)

(0.74–0.79)

(0.81–0.85)

(0.80–0.90)

(0.87–0.92)

(0.80–0.89)

(0.87–0.93)

Neural network

58.87

0.63

80.38

0.84

87.85

0.90

89.72

0.84

(0.56–0.60)

(0.62–0.64)

(0.76–0.84)

(0.81–0.87)

(0.83–0.90)

(0.87–0.92

(0.84–0.93)

(0.82–0.85)