Table 4 Comparison evaluation of the SASVCP-ODTSA model with existing techniques34,35,36.
Technique | \(\:{A}{c}{c}{{u}}_{{y}}\) | \(\:{P}{r}{e}{{c}}_{{n}}\) | \(\:{R}{e}{c}{{a}}_{{l}}\) | \(\:{{F}1}_{{s}{c}{o}{r}{e}}\) | Time Consumed (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libra RCNN | 92.79 | 90.68 | 72.30 | 83.56 | 16.14 |
Cascade RCNN + res2net + DCNv2 | 91.05 | 84.35 | 70.82 | 82.49 | 20.96 |
YOLOv3 | 96.54 | 79.14 | 76.73 | 80.12 | 14.91 |
YOLOXs | 95.51 | 80.28 | 79.31 | 84.02 | 20.60 |
ResNet18 + LSA | 97.68 | 84.45 | 72.59 | 76.93 | 18.36 |
IOD155 + tfidf | 89.43 | 85.96 | 71.21 | 81.22 | 9.36 |
PointNet++ | 94.13 | 87.42 | 72.88 | 73.67 | 10.34 |
CBORM model | 98.41 | 82.00 | 79.14 | 82.58 | 21.13 |
SASVCP-ODTSA | 99.58 | 91.77 | 84.71 | 87.15 | 6.45 |
