Table 5 Comparison of no-reference image quality metrics for various enhancement techniques on the LIME dataset3.
From: A multi scale spatial attention based zero shot learning framework for low light image enhancement
Metric | Paired supervision | Unsupervised | Zero-shot learning | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMEF102 | LIME3 | MF103 | Multiscale Retinex104 | EnlightenGAN56 | SG-ZSL54 | Zero-DCE52 | Zero-DCE++53 | Ours | |
NIMA91 | 4.48 | 4.48 | 4.53 | 4.36 | 4.47 | 4.47 | 4.37 | 4.39 | 4.51 |
PaQ2PiQ92 | 73.51 | 75.82 | 74.83 | 74.32 | 74.58 | 74.58 | 74.94 | 74.96 | 74.72 |
DBCNN93 | 52.13 | 48.90 | 49.41 | 51.06 | 48.57 | 48.57 | 46.81 | 46.83 | 52.51 |
musiq-koniq55 | 61.29 | 61.25 | 61.58 | 61.58 | 60.35 | 60.35 | 59.59 | 59.61 | 61.03 |
MANIQA94 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
CLIPIQA95 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.40 |
TReS-koniq96 | 69.50 | 63.33 | 66.35 | 66.98 | 66.08 | 66.79 | 67.77 | 67.79 | 69.69 |
HyperIQA97 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.52 |
GPR-BIQA10 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
Quality Net98 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
PIQI9 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.67 |
Average | 24.03 | 23.38 | 23.65 | 23.78 | 23.41 | 23.47 | 23.34 | 23.36 | 24.18 |