Table 10 The effect of dietary treatment the relative abundance of selected bacterial family in ileal and colonic digesta (mean % relative abundance with their standard errors).
Family | Treatment* | SEM | P value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grain preservation method | Dried | OA-preserved | Dried | OA-preserved | Grain | ZnO | Grain x ZnO | |
Zinc oxide supplementation | No | No | Yes | Yes | ||||
Ileum | ||||||||
Lactobacillaceae | 60.78ab | 56.91ab | 54.53a | 62.68b | 3.080 | 0.473 | 0.907 | 0.050 |
Lachnospiraceae | 9.29a | 2.19b | 5.38ab | 5.30ab | 1.152 | 0.001 | 0.393 | 0.001 |
Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.06 | 0.51 | 2.27 | 1.83 | 0.569 | 0.272 | 0.007 | 0.179 |
Eubacteriaceae | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.299 | 0.722 | 0.619 | 0.872 |
Oscillospiraceae | 0.70 | 1.72 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.536 | 0.603 | 0.049 | 0.282 |
Ruminococcaceae | 7.58 | 10.99 | 9.72 | 12.20 | 1.483 | 0.027 | 0.174 | 0.571 |
Enterobacteriaceae | 12.53a | 2.08bc | 0.90b | 4.20c | 0.774 | 0.650 | 0.002 | < 0.001 |
Clostridiaceae | 1.16 | 2.64 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 0.664 | 0.663 | 0.663 | 0.108 |
Acidaminococcaceae | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.131 | 0.864 | 0.786 | 0.840 |
Hungateiclostridiaceae | 1.54 | 1.34 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.473 | 0.907 | 0.084 | 0.647 |
Colon | ||||||||
Lactobacillaceae | 58.96 | 45.63 | 65.62 | 60.03 | 3.062 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.109 |
Lachnospiraceae | 12.80ab | 9.07a | 8.63a | 15.43b | 1.485 | 0.311 | 0.555 | 0.001 |
Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 1.03 | 0.383 | 0.784 | 0.456 | 0.092 |
Eubacteriaceae | 1.05 | 0.47 | 1.37 | 1.73 | 0.498 | 0.481 | 0.063 | 0.207 |
Ruminococcaceae | 13.86 | 13.55 | 14.87 | 14.38 | 1.503 | 0.790 | 0.534 | 0.959 |
Clostridiaceae | 0.34 | 0.55 | 1.01 | 0.79 | 0.380 | 0.815 | 0.171 | 0.475 |
Enterobacteriaceae | 0.29a | 5.73b | 1.23a | 1.34a | 0.977 | 0.002 | 0.993 | 0.003 |