Table 8 Case-2: frequency response comparison of different optimization techniques.
Optimization technique | \(\:{\Delta\:}{{f}}_{1}\) | \(\:{\Delta\:}{{f}}_{2}\) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Settling time (s) | POS | PUS | Settling time (s) | POS | PUS | |
MGO | 9.47621 | 0.01731 | 0.2475 | 9.47621 | 0.03599 | 0.3312 |
AO | 8.93803 | 0.01668 | 0.2451 | 13.3705 | 0.06326 | 0.3233 |
MGO-AO | 8.43137 | 0.01343 | 0.2296 | 8.86101 | 0.03359 | 0.3186 |
ARO | 8.69097 | 0.01652 | 0.22079 | 9.02251 | 0.03304 | 0.31956 |
GWO-PSO | 10.2989 | 0.02344 | 0.2039 | 10.2562 | 0.05404 | 0.26847 |
Modified SSA | 9.26721 | 0.01667 | 0.24514 | 9.63482 | 0.03699 | 0.3150 |