Abstract
Exploring highly foldable batteries with no safety hazard is a vital task for the realization of portable, wearable, and implantable electric devices. Owing to these concerns, developing solid-state batteries is one of the most promising routes to achieve this aspiration. Because of the excellent flexibility and process ability, Sodium alginate blends polyvinyl alcohol-based electrolytes possess great potential to pack high energy density flexible batteries, however, suffers the various intrinsic shortcomings such as inferior ionic conductivity, a high degree of crystallinity, and lack of reactive groups. In this present work, polymer electrolyte films based on NaAlg blend PVA doped with NH4VO3 salt were prepared by solution casting method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) explains that the enhancement of conductivity is affected by the degree of crystallinity. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis confirms the interaction between polymers and salt. For NaAlg/PVA system, a sample containing 15 wt% of NH4VO3 possesses the highest ionic conductivity of 0.67 × 10− 5 S cm− 1. Several electrical and electrochemical characteristics of the prepared electrolytes were examined, including impedance, dielectric behavior, transference number, electrochemical stability window, energy density, specific capacitance (Cs), and power density. The ionic conductivity of the synthesized solid biopolymer electrolyte (SBE) system was found to be influenced by ion mobility (µ) and the diffusion coefficient (D). Hence, the aforementioned results indicate that the developed SBE system holds strong potential for application in electrochemical energy storage and conversion devices such as proton batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Polymer electrolytes are considered as viable materials for emerging energy storage and conversion technologies, including solid-state batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells. Their favourable characteristics-such as mechanical flexibility, thermal stability, and design adaptability—make them promising alternatives to conventional liquid electrolytes, which suffer from issues like leakage, volatility, and chemical instability1,2. Among these, solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) offer significant advantages by enabling safer, leak-proof, and more compact devices3.
The development of polymer blend systems combining synthetic and natural polymers has gained momentum in recent years due to their enhanced ion transport properties, environmental compatibility, and film-forming ability. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) is a widely studied synthetic polymer known for its semi-crystalline structure, hydrophilicity, and excellent dielectric strength. Its hydroxyl-rich backbone allows complexation with salt ions, promoting ionic mobility4. Blending PVA with sodium alginate (NaAlg)—a biopolymer derived from brown seaweed containing carboxyl functional groups—further enhances its electrochemical and mechanical performance. The resulting polymer matrix supports improved ion hopping through both hydroxyl and carboxyl coordination sites, making it suitable for flexible and biodegradable electrochemical systems5,6.
In recent years, research efforts in polymer electrolytes have predominantly centred on lithium-ion (Li⁺) and sodium-ion (Na⁺) battery systems because of their promising energy density and established technological base7. These studies have explored polymer hosts and biopolymer blends designed to support Li⁺/Na⁺ transport8,9,10. Nevertheless, these systems face persistent limitations—such as narrow electrochemical stability windows, high interfacial resistance with electrodes, mechanical fragility under deformation (for wearable devices), and sustainability issues linked to lithium or sodium resources11,12,13.
To improve ionic conductivity, such polymer blends are typically doped with ammonium salts, which act as sources of NH₄⁺ cations, capable of moving through the polymer network via segmental motion and hydrogen bonding interactions14. Ammonium-based salts like NH₄Cl, NH₄NO₃, and NH₄SCN have been widely used in various polymer matrices, although their conductivities are often limited by ion pairing or inadequate salt dissociation—leading to values lower than 10 –6 S/cm15,16,17. The challenge remains to identify suitable ammonium salts that can promote both high ionic dissociation and polymer compatibility.
In this context, ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃) presents a unique advantage (i.e.) besides NH₄⁺ ions, VO₃⁻ anions, which are redox-active and may contribute to additional charge transport or even pseudocapacitive behavior. The dual ionic nature and redox properties of NH₄VO₃ can potentially enhance ionic conductivity and structural robustness18,19. Moreover, vanadium-based dopants have been shown to improve the mechanical integrity, thermal resistance, and electrochemical functionality of polymer systems20.
Several methods exist for the fabrication of polymer electrolytes, including hot pressing, sol–gel processing, electrospinning, and solution casting. Among these, the solution casting technique is particularly attractive due to its low cost, ease of fabrication, and ability to produce homogenous, flexible thin films with well-dispersed salt content and controlled morphology21. It is especially effective for multi-component systems where polymer-salt interactions must be carefully tuned.
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) blended with sodium alginate (NaAlg) has been widely studied as a polymer host for solid electrolytes, and several reports confirm that the conductivity often remains below 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ for many salt concentrations. Cyriac et al. demonstrated that introducing sodium iodide (NaI) into PVA–NaAlg increased conductivity, but values at lower salt loadings were confined to the 10⁻⁷–10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ range, approaching ~ 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ only at optimum composition22,23. Jansi et al. investigated ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃) addition and found that a maximum of ~ 1.05 × 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ occurred for the 60:40:15 blend ratio, while reduced salt fractions consistently gave conductivities below 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹24. In another study, researchers working with ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl) observed a peak of ~ 1.01 × 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ at 15 wt%, with all lower concentrations remaining in the sub-10⁻⁶ regime25. Sheela et al. reported that doping with potassium chloride (KCl) yielded conductivity values between 10⁻⁸ and 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ at ambient temperature, with the majority of compositions never surpassing the 10⁻⁶ mark26. Likewise, studies on ammonium thiocyanate (NH₄SCN) incorporated into PVA–NaAlg showed that initial salt additions gave conductivities in the 10⁻⁷–10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹ range, and only higher concentrations pushed the values beyond 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹27.
As a result, there is growing interest in alternative ionic conduction systems, particularly those based on protonic or ammonium (NH₄⁺) charge carriers. These species offer potential advantages including lighter weight, greater abundance, and favourable hydrogen-bond networks that facilitate ion hopping28. Ammonium-doped polymer electrolytes in particular promise flexible, environmentally benign architectures. However, many of these ammonium-ion systems still suffer from relatively low ionic conductivities (often < 10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹) and limited electrochemical functionality29.
The proton conduction mechanism in ammonium salt–based systems arises from the weakly bonded proton (H⁺) in the NH₄⁺ ion, which facilitates ionic motion through the proton-hopping mechanism. Abdullah et al. (2018) demonstrated that incorporation of NH₄NO₃ into a methylcellulose–PVA blend produced a proton-conducting polymer electrolyte, where one of the four protons attached to the nitrogen atom is loosely bound and capable of hopping between neighboring electronegative sites30. Similarly, Hemalatha et al. (2019) reported that ammonium salts act as effective proton donors, as the loosely bound hydrogen in NH₄⁺ migrates through hydrogen-bonded pathways in the polymer matrix, enhancing ionic conductivity31.
The ionic conductivity value obtained in this study aligns with previously reported proton-conducting biopolymer electrolytes. In the report of MC–PVA: NH₄NO₃ 20 wt% achieved a conductivity of 7.39 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹30, while Nizam et al. (2025) reported an ac conductivity of 1.01 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹ for Alginate–PVA: NH₄I bio-polymer electrolytes prepared by solution casting32.
In view of aforementioned challenges, the present work introduces a novel solid polymer electrolyte system composed of NaAlg–PVA blended matrix doped with ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃). This material strategy offers several advantages: (i) the NH₄⁺ ion acts as a mobile charge carrier enabling protonic or ammonium ion conduction; (ii) the VO₃⁻ moiety brings redox-active centres and structural reinforcement, thereby affording the possibility of pseudocapacitive behaviour or improved dielectric response; (iii) the biopolymer matrix grants flexibility, biodegradability and potentially lower cost compared to conventional Li⁺/Na⁺ systems. Thus, the reported NaAlg–PVA–NH₄VO₃ composite electrolyte presents a sustainable alternative to Li⁺/Na⁺ oriented systems, offering enhanced ionic mobility, mechanical robustness, and multifunctional electrochemical behaviour.
Herein we report the influence of varying concentrations of ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃) on the ionic conductivity, structural properties, dielectric behavior and electrochemical performance of PVA–NaAlg solid blend polymer electrolytes.
Material and method
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, MW = 125000 g/mol), sodium alginate (NaAlg, MW = 194.18 g/mol), and ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃, MW = 116.98 g/mol) were obtained from Otta Chem Pvt Ltd, Sigma-Aldrich, and Avra Chem Ltd, respectively. Distilled water served as the solvent. The optimized PVA: NaAlg blend ratio reported in our earlier study17 was adopted for preparing polymer electrolytes incorporating different concentrations of NH₄VO₃ (5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%). The PVA/NH₄VO₃ solution was first prepared in distilled water, while NaAlg was dissolved separately. Both solutions were then combined and stirred continuously for about 6 h to ensure uniform mixing. The homogeneous solution was cast into petri dishes and dried in an oven at 60 °C to obtain thin membranes. The prepared films were subsequently stored in a desiccator. The designations of the samples with varying NH₄VO₃ loadings are summarized in Table 1. The resulting membranes exhibited thicknesses in the range of 0.006–0.015 mm, as measured using a screw gauge. A schematic representation of the synthesis procedure for PVA/NaAlg–NH₄VO₃ polymer electrolytes is shown in Fig. 1.
Characterization techniques
The structural characteristics of the amorphous and crystalline phases of the solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) were examined using a Bruker X-ray diffractometer (λ = 1.54 Å) with a scanning rate of 5° per minute over the 2θ range of 10° to 60°. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, performed with the SHIMADZU IR Tracer 100, was employed to monitor the incorporation of NH₄VO3 into the polymer blend. The spectra were recorded in the wavenumber range of 4000–500 cm⁻¹ to analyze the interactions among PVA, NaAlg, and NH₄VO3. Ionic conductivity measurements were conducted using a HIOKI 3532-50 LCR Hi-Tester within the frequency range of 42 Hz to 1 MHz. For electrochemical analysis, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out using a CH-Instrument Model 6008e.
Fabrication of electrode
The first stage in preparing the EDLC is the development of carbon electrodes. N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF), and activated carbon (obtained from SANWA Components, Inc.) were utilized in an 8:1:1 weight ratio. Using a mortar and pestle, PVdF and activated carbon were thoroughly combined with NMP to create a homogenous slurry. After evenly coating nickel foil with this slurry, it was dried for 12 h at 80 °C. In order to eliminate any remaining moisture, the resultant electrodes were then kept in a desiccator filled with silica gel.
Result and discussion
XRD analysis
The XRD pattern of Pure PVA, NaAlg and blended electrolytes (PNVI-PNV4) were shown in Fig. 2. It exhibits a broad diffraction peak (indicative of its semicrystalline nature) at 2θ ≈ 19.5–20° for pure PVA and intense peaks of pure NaAlg at 13°, 31.42°, and 45.14° are attributed to polysaccharide structure. Upon blending to make the PN sample, the smaller peak intensities and widener profiles denote the breakdown of crystalline areas, and are explained by stretching the initial order of the matrix by interpolymer interactions33. Upon doping with NH₄VO₃, the relative intensity of the peaks decreases due to the distortion of the polymer structure and enhancing the amorphous nature. It can be observed that the intensity of peak decrease from PNV1 to PNV3 due to strong intermolecular interactions. Notably, PNV3 exhibits the lowest peak intensity, suggesting the highest degree of amorphization, which is favorable for ion mobility. On further addition of the salt, the intensity of peaks increases for PNV4, which indicates the increase in crystallinity. The rise in peak intensity suggests that at this higher salt level, the polymer host reaches its saturation limit, causing a portion of the NH₄VO₃ to segregate into ordered regions. This leads to the return of crystalline features due to localized salt accumulation or slight structural ordering within the polymer chains34,35,36. The presented structural change between the crystalline and the amorphous states is quite consistent with previous experimental and simulation studies of solid polymer electrolytes and has demonstrated that highly amorphous systems such as PNV3 have better ionic conductivity37.
Equation (1) is employed for calculating the percentage crystallinity (\(\:{\chi\:}_{c}\)) of the electrolytes.
where Ac → area under the crystalline peaks, Aa → area under the amorphous peak. The values are represented in Table 2.
FTIR analysis
FTIR spectra of pure PVA, pure NaAlg, and PVA: NaAlg: NH4VO3 (5, 10, 15, 20 wt%) membranes are illustrated as PN, PNV systems in Fig. 3. These spectra demonstrates the existence and interconnection of major functional groups and are presented in Table 3. A wide and high band seen approaching 3309 cm− 1 in all the samples was found to be due to OH- stretching vibration of both PVA and NaAlg and was ascribed to hydrogen bonding between Hydroxyl groups of PVA and NaAlg. The doped samples (PNV series) shifted this band, which reflects an increased hydrogen bonding and polymer-salt interaction38,39.
The stretching vibration of C-H in the range of ~ 2916–2917 cm− 1 is the indication of the presence of aliphatic chains of PVA, which do not change during blending or doping. This is because the C = O stretching vibration at around 1720–1725 cm− 1 due to the uronic acid units in sodium alginate did not disappear, which is evidence of retention of backbone intactness across the samples14. A major change is the change of the COO- asymmetric stretching of vibration at 1540 cm− 1 in pure NaAlg to 1594 cm− 1 in the doped samples, which indicates complexation of the carboxylate group of Alginate with ammonium ions of NH4VO312,40.
Also, the bending vibrations of CH2 at ~ 1418–1421 cm− 1 and the C-O-C stretching vibrations observed in the region of 1252 –1025 cm− 1 indicate the structure of the PVA-NaAlg matrix. These are peaks that do not experience dramatic change in position but they experience slight broadening in the doped films in agreement with the polymer-salt interactions that enhance amorphicity without disrupting the polymer chains39,40. Backbone vibration of base polymers is also confirmed by the C-C bending mode (929 cm− 1) and C-H bending modes (838 cm− 1)38. These observed spectral shifts, as well as the broadening, are revealing the effective mixing and complexation between NaAlg, PVA, and NH4VO3 and thereby achieving better values in amorphous content and enhancing the behavior of ionic transportation as observed in earlier works of PVA-based electrolyte systems in the doped forms of ammonium salts, and vanadates12,41.
AC impedance spectroscopy
For the determination of impedance, i.e. Z∗(ω) = Z′ +jZ″ where Z′ and Z″ are the real and imaginary parts of the impedance, the polymeric films were sandwiched in between silver as blocking electrodes.
Nyquist plots
The Nyquist plots of NaAlg: PVA: NH₄VO₃ (5 wt% to 20 wt%) polymer electrolyte films in Fig. 4 shows the two distinct depressed semicircles followed by a low-frequency tail which affirms to the coexistence of bulk and interfacial relaxation processes. the high-frequency arc pertains to the bulk ionic conduction and mid-frequency arc associate with inter-domain or electrode-electrolyte interfacial resistance42,43. The ionic conductivity of all the polymer electrolytes has been evaluated using the equation
where t is the thickness and A is the contact area of the electrolyte film. The Warburg-like tail (low frequency) line reflects behavior on capacitive blocks at electrodes and the semicircle is the bulk resistance of the electrolyte (Rb). The PNV3 15 wt% NH₄VO₃ has the least diameter of the semicircle of the compositions analyzed, which implies that it has the lowest concentration of Rb and has ionic conductivity of 0.67 × 10− 5 S cm− 143. This agrees with studies that demonstrate that conductivity proceeds to increase with salt concentration as far as it permits a lot and then excess salt makes partners remain with ions or cluster together that reduces free ion movement and increases resistance44. The presence of the spike at the low frequencies provides second evidence that the diffusion method is non-Faradaic and ionic dependent under blocking electrode principle42. Altogether, the impedance measurements are in favour of 15 wt% NH₄VO₃ as the ideal loading in providing flexibility of the polymerised chain, dissociation of the ions and charge transport to move freely in order to ensure high performance of electrolyte. The diffusion coefficient(D), mobility(µ) and number of charge carriers(N) were estimated and tabulated in the Table 4 using the following relation,
Where, D → diffusion coefficient of ions (cm²/s); fmax → frequency at which dielectric loss (tan δ) shows a maximum (Hz); d →thickness of the electrolyte film (cm); tan δmax →maximum dielectric loss tangent; µ → Ionic mobility (cm²/V·s); σdc→ dc ionic conductivity (S/cm); N → number of charge carriers per unit volume (cm⁻³); q → Charge of a single ion (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C); kB → Boltzmann constant (1.38 × 10⁻²³ J/K); T → absolute temperature (K).
Interpretation of CNLS fitting
The impedance spectra of the NaAlg–PVA: NH₄VO₃ polymer blend films in Fig. 4 were analyzed using complex nonlinear least-squares (CNLS) fitting using ZView software to evaluate the effect of salt concentration on ion transport behaviour. The spectra were fitted with the equivalent electrical circuit model (Rs-(Rb||CPEb)-(Rgb||CPEgb)- CPEel), where Rs is the series/contact resistance (Ω), Rb is the bulk resistance of the conductive domains (Ω), and CPEb is the constant-phase element (CPE) representing non-ideal bulk capacitance, Rgb is the grain-boundary / inter-domain / interfacial resistance (Ω), and CPEgb is the corresponding CPE, and CPEel represents the low-frequency, electrode-related non-ideal capacitance (blocking behaviour and any diffusion tail) which accounts for bulk and interfacial contributions to the total impedance. The parameters obtained from the fitting are summarized in Table 5. The fitted values clearly shows that the bulk resistance (Rb) decreases as the NH₄VO₃ content increases from 5 wt% (PNV1) to 15 wt% (PNV3), indicating enhanced ionic motion within the polymer matrix. The 15 wt% film exhibits the smallest (Rb) value (≈ 134 Ω) and the shortest relaxation time ((τb ≈ 4 × 10− 6) s), confirming that this composition supports the fastest ion migration and the most efficient segmental dynamics. Beyond this optimum level, at 20 wt% (PNV4), (Rb) rises sharply and the overall arc broadens, which can be attributed to ion–ion interactions and the formation of aggregated clusters that restrict charge movement45.
The capacitance associated with the bulk process (Cb) increases gradually with salt loading up to 15 wt%, reflecting greater charge storage capability due to improved ion dissociation and the increased availability of polar sites. However, the interfacial elements (Rgb) and (Cgb) become unstable at higher loading, consistent with the emergence of a secondary semicircle in the Nyquist plot, suggesting increased inter-domain polarization and ion accumulation at boundaries46. Thus, the CNLS analysis demonstrates that a moderate NH₄VO₃ concentration (15 wt%) provides the best compromise between ion dissociation and polymer-chain flexibility, resulting in low resistance and a faster dielectric relaxation process. Higher salt content leads to clustering and restricted mobility, while lower loading yields incomplete ion dissociation and reduced conductivity.
Conduction spectra
(a) AC conductivity and ion transport behavior
The AC conductivity (σac) versus frequency response of PVA–sodium alginate polymer electrolytes doped with different concentrations of ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃) is illustrated in Fig. 5(a). The plot of log(σ) vs. log(ω) reveal two distinct regions: a low-frequency plateau and a high-frequency dispersive slope. The plateau corresponds to DC conductivity (σdc) resulting from long-range ion transport, while the rise at higher frequencies indicates localized ion hopping between neighbouring sites47.
As the salt concentration increases from 5 wt% to 15 wt%, there is a significant increase in σdc, which is attributed to the growing number of mobile NH₄⁺ and VO₃⁻ ions. These ions interact with polar functional groups (–OH and –COO⁻) within the polymer matrix, facilitating transient ionic pathways and enhancing conductivity48,49. This behavior is consistent with the mechanism proposed by Jonscher, where ion mobility in disordered polymer systems increases with salt content up to an optimal concentration50.
However, at 20 wt% NH₄VO₃, the conductivity decreases, likely due to ion–ion aggregation and reduced polymer flexibility, which limit the number of free charge carriers. This trend has been widely reported in polymer electrolytes, where excessive salt leads to ion pairing or clustering, negatively impacting ion transport51. Additionally, the high-frequency tail seen in all spectra confirms electrode polarization behavior and hopping conduction, supporting the ion-dominated transport model52.
(b) Ion conduction mechanism
The conduction behavior observed in the NaAlg: PVA: NH₄VO₃ polymer electrolyte system shown in Fig. 5 (a) follows a hopping-based ion transport mechanism, where ions traverse between transient coordination sites supported by the segmental motion of the polymer chains. The incorporation of NH₄VO₃ acts not only as a source of mobile ions (NH₄⁺ and VO₃⁻), but also alters the structural organization of the polymer matrix by reducing crystallinity and promoting the formation of amorphous domains, thereby increasing the free volume and enhancing ionic conductivity53.
The overall ion conduction process shown in Fig. 5 (b) involves: (i) Complexation of NH₄⁺ ions with polar oxygen-containing groups such as –OH and –COO⁻ in the polymer backbone, (ii) Ion dissociation, yielding free NH₄⁺ and VO₃⁻ ions, which serve as charge carriers, (iii) Localized ion hopping between temporary coordination sites facilitated by polymer segmental motion54. At higher salt concentrations (e.g., 20 wt%), ion pairing or aggregation occurs, which limits the number of free charge carriers and hinders conductivity due to reduced ion mobility and polymer chain flexibility55. Thus, the optimal NH₄VO₃ concentration of 15 wt% achieves the right balance between ion availability and polymer chain dynamics, maximizing conductivity. This composition is particularly suitable for next-generation solid-state electrochemical energy storage devices, including batteries and supercapacitors, where safety, flexibility, and efficiency are critical21.
Dielectric spectra analysis
Figure 6 shows real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) portion of the dielectric permittivity as a function of log ω for divulging the dielectric capabilities of NaAlg: PVA: NH₄VO₃ polymer blend electrolytes. The values of both ε′ and ε″ both are extremely large at low frequencies (log ω = 2.5–3), and the value decreases with increase in frequency. It arises due to interfacial polarization and space-charge effects, which are characteristic of the salt-doped polymer. In Fig. 6, the real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) components of the dielectric permittivity as a function of log ω are displayed to illustrate the dielectric characteristics of NaAlg: PVA: NH₄VO₃ polymer blend electrolytes. Both ε′ and ε″ exhibit extremely high values at low frequencies (log ω = 2.5–3), which gradually decline with increasing frequency. Interfacial polarization and space-charge effects, which are common in salt-doped polymer electrolytes, are the cause of this pattern56.
The samples with the highest ε′ at low frequencies are those with a 15 weight% NH4VO₃ composition. This suggests that optimum dipolar orientation and free charge carrier density are ensured with the salt loading modesty that enhances dielectric responsiveness57. Figure 6 displays the dielectric properties of NaAlg: PVA: NH4VO₃ polymer blend electrolytes which shows the real (2) and imaginary (2) parts of the dielectric permittivity as a functional dependence on log ω. At frequencies as low as (log ω ≈ 2.5–3) very high values of both the ε′ and ε″ imply that at that frequency, the dielectric constant and the loss are incredibly high and decrease rapidly with increasing frequency. This trend can be attributed to interfacial polarization and space-charge effects which are characteristics of salt-doped polymeric electrolytes56.
Of all the samples, 15 wt% NH4VO₃ composition has maximized values of ε′ and ε″ at low frequencies (log ω ≈ 2–3) and is followed by 10 wt%, 5 wt%, and 20 wt%. This indicates that moderate salt loading optimizes magnitude of dipolar orientation and concentration of free charge carriers thereby enhancing dielectric performance54. At higher frequencies (log ω ≈ 5), ε′ and ε″ vary less and converge to smaller, constant levels of the dipole model and ion model failure to respond to high frequency fields, which has been reported widely in polymer blended electrolytes56,58.
The ε″ peak intensity is most pronounced for the 15 wt% sample, implying greater dielectric loss due to ion–dipole relaxation mechanisms. Meanwhile, the 10 wt% sample shows moderate dielectric loss, reflecting efficient ion mobility with minimal clustering, which may promote superior ionic conductivity57. Such behaviour is consistent with those obtained in PVA–K₂CO₃ gel polymer electrolytes where both ε′ and ε″ of the composite decreased with the frequency and high conductive composites were associated with a larger dielectric response at low frequencies58.
Therefore, the 15 wt% NH accent configurations provide the highest dielectric polarization whereas 10 wt% represents a concession which is reasonable in connection with the ion dissociation and the chain flexibility of the polymer necessary in connection with the energy storage devices.
Figure 7 shows real (M′ ) and imaginary (M″) components of electric modulus as a function of log of frequency in NaAlg: PVA: NH4VO3 (PNV) electrolytes with salt loading of 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt%. Both, M′ and M″ are approached by log ω < 5 with values close to zero at low frequencies which signal the relatively modest polarization of the electrodes and space charge behaviour of ionic conductive polymer matrices59. At higher frequencies, above log ω ≈ 5, M′ rises sharply drops off in a steep fashion and the dielectric stiffness begins to occur with considerable ionic mobility limitation. Particularly, in the 15 wt% NH4VO3 sample, M′ values remain the lowest and the M″ peak the slowest to emerge meaning that the polymer exhibits an increased segmental dynamics and overall shorter response time, a characteristic of better ionic conductivity60. Conversely, M′ at low frequencies is higher in the 5 wt% and 20 wt% samples, suggesting that the ion cluster or a slow chain mobility, a situation that impedes ionic motion. This attribute is an indication of the consequence of improperly salting the polymers either below or above on their flexibility and ion separation61. A combination of these inferences confirms that 15 wt% NH4VO3 is the best balance of ion dissociated and flexibility in the polymer. The results affirm better ion conduction parameters within the host matrix of NaAlg: PVA.
Tangent spectra analysis
Figure 8 is the plot of dielectric loss (tan δ) with respect to frequency (log ω) in polymer nanocomposite electrolytes doped with different concentrations of NH₄VO₃. All the samples show a single peak in the relaxation spectra, suggesting that the main mechanism of relaxation is the polymer segmental motion coupled with the transport of mobile ions. Among the samples with higher dielectric loss peaks, it is remarkable that 15 wt% NH₄VO₃ has the lowest relaxation time of 6.76 × 10− 6 s, which can be attributed to the optimum amorphous phase content and the maximum polymer chain flexibility. This is in agreement with earlier results where, if the salt concentration used to modify polymer electrolytes was moderate, it would result in higher dipole relaxation and ion dissociation and therefore, greater dielectric loss62.
The peak shift of tan δ to higher frequencies with increasing filler content above 15 wt% (i.e., 20 wt%) indicates an increase in ion mobility as ion pair aggregation or stiffening of the polymer takes place. On the other hand, the lower concentrations (5 and 10 wt%) do not have adequate mobile charge carriers to achieve optimal performance. Therefore, it could be concluded that 15 wt% NH₄VO₃ was found to be the best blend composition to produce the maximum value of dielectric relaxation and ionic conductivity. The peak-centered dielectric characteristics and optimal filler loadings were also observed in other PVA-based systems and NaAlg-based systems in applications to energy storage devices63,64.
Cyclic voltammetry analysis
Figure 9 shows the cyclic voltammetry curve of the PVA (60 wt%) : NaAlg (40 wt%) + 15 wt% NH₄VO₃ electrolyte. The CV curve exhibits a nearly rectangular shape, indicating good capacitive behavior and stable electrochemical performance of the cell. Voltammograms obtained at scan rates between 5 and 100 mV s⁻¹ shown in Fig. 10a displays curves that were generally close to rectangular, but with slight distortion, suggesting that the charge storage mechanism is not purely electric double-layer in nature and that additional Faradaic contributions are present65,66. The minor broadening observed in certain regions of the curves is consistent with redox activity linked to vanadium species from the ammonium vanadate component67.
Specific capacitance (Cs) values with different scan rates (Table 6), calculated by integrating the CV curve area shown in Fig. 10b and normalizing to the active material mass, decreased systematically with increasing scan rate. The highest capacitance of 2.129 F g⁻¹ was recorded at 5 mV s⁻¹, whereas at 100 mV s⁻¹ the value dropped to 0.721 F g⁻¹. This decline indicates that ion transport and interfacial charge transfer processes are increasingly restricted at higher sweep rates, limiting the active area available for charge storage68,69,– 70. At slower scan rates, electrolyte ions have sufficient time to diffuse through the polymer matrix and reach both surface and bulk active sites, thereby enhancing the total stored charge.
The observed behavior reflects a combination of electric double-layer charging from the PVA–NaAlg host matrix and pseudocapacitive contributions from ammonium vanadate. PVA’s semi-crystalline segments can restrict segmental chain motion, while NaAlg provides hydrophilic ionic pathways71. Ammonium vanadate offers redox-active V⁵⁺/V⁴⁺ centers, which can enhance capacitance at low scan rates but are subject to diffusion limitations66,68. This hybrid charge storage mechanism explains the higher capacitance at low rates and the pronounced drop at high rates, a pattern similar to other polymer electrolytes containing redox-active additives72.
The capacitance retention ratio, defined as Cs (100 mV s− 1)/Cs(5 mV s− 1), was approximately 34%, confirming that a substantial fraction of the total capacitance is inaccessible during fast cycling. Such rate-dependent behavior has been reported for polymer blend electrolytes with slow ion migration and significant interfacial resistance66,70. Additional studies, such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the separation of capacitive and diffusion-controlled current contributions using power-law analysis, would provide further insight into the charge storage processes73.
Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD)
Figure 11 (a) displays the galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves for the PNV3 polymer electrolyte-composed of PVA, sodium alginate, and 15 wt % NH₄VO₃ recorded at current densities ranging from 1 to 6 A·g⁻¹. The curves exhibit nearly symmetrical triangular shapes, indicating ideal electric double-layer capacitance with negligible faradaic contribution, consistent with similar behavior observed in Alginate–PVA–LiTFSI systems showing predominantly ionic transport (tion ≈ 0.98) and low resistance74. At 1 Ag⁻¹, the charge–discharge duration is significantly longer-reflecting higher specific capacitance and effective ion diffusion. As current density increases, discharge time decreases due to limited ion transport time and less accessibility to active sites-typical in polymer electrolyte systems. Notably, the GCD profiles show minimal initial voltage drop (IR drop) even at high currents, indicating low internal resistance and high ionic mobility-paralleling findings in NH₄I-doped Alginate–PVA blends where plasticization lowered Tg and enhanced conductivity75. As shown in Fig. 11(b), the energy density versus power density plot confirms that the device maintains consistent energy storage and power delivery across different current densities. The maintenance of triangular shapes across all current densities further demonstrates electrochemical stability and structural integrity, much like PVA-based gel electrolytes with ammonium salts and ionic liquids, which preserve EDLC behavior and capacitance retention under cycling76,77. Overall, the GCD analysis confirms that the optimized PNV3 composition offers high ionic conductivity, low internal resistance, and stable EDLC performance, making it a promising candidate for flexible energy storage devices.
Transference number analysis
The ion transference number (tion) was determined by Wagner DC polarization using blocking electrodes (silver coated with graphite). The transference number measurement (TNM) involves the use of either non-blocking or blocking electrodes. In non-blocking electrodes, both ions and electrons contribute to conduction, while in blocking electrodes, only electrons can move through them. To identify whether electrons or ions are the primary charge carriers, one can compare the electron transport time (te) and the ion transport time (tion). For instance, in a polymer electrolyte film, the ion transport time (tion) is greater than the electron transport time (te), indicating that ions are the main charge carriers in the polymer electrolyte78. The silver electrode coated with graphite is utilized to obstruct the ions. The high initial current occurs due to the flow of both ions and electrons, while the final saturation current is solely due to electron conduction. The transference numbers for the prepared electrolytes are provided in Table 779.
The transference number has been calculated using the given formula:
where tion is the transport number of ion, te is the transport number of electron, Ii is the initial current, and If is the final current.
The current is observed as a function of time until a steady state is achieved. Initially, the current decreases over time, as illustrated in Fig. 1280.
The ion transport number rises with higher salt concentrations, which is attributed to the increase in the concentration of ions (both cations and anions), leading to a higher initial current. For the 15wt% NH4VO3 complexed electrolyte system, the ion transport number reached a high value of 0.99928, which may be adequate for the needs of solid-state electrochemical cells81 (Table 8).
Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV)
LSV is used to assess the electrochemical stability potential window of polymer-blend solid electrolytes. The LSV analysis was conducted on the PVA: NaAlg/NH4Cl system, which exhibited the highest conductivity, to evaluate its electrochemical stability. For the PVA: NaAlg with 15 wt% NH4VO3, which is the most conductive solid polymer electrolyte (SBPE), LSV was utilized to determine the electrochemical stability window (ESW), as illustrated in Fig. 1382. The setup involved a silver electrode on both sides of the PVA: NaAlg:15 wt% NH4VO3 layer. The voltage was applied in the range of 0 to 1.2 V. No significant current was detected up to an electrode potential of 1 V. However, beyond the breakdown voltage of 1.34 V, a sharp increase in current was noted, indicating the presence of the electrochemical stability window. This increase was attributed to the decomposition of the SBPEs at the interface with the inert electrode27,83.
Conclusions
In this study, NaAlg–PVA polymer electrolyte films doped with ammonium metavanadate were successfully fabricated via the solution casting method. The systematic increase in ionic conductivity with NH₄VO₃ addition up to 15 wt% highlights the effective role of salt in modulating charge carrier dynamics. The decrease in crystallinity seen in XRD patterns, along with FTIR-confirmed polymer–salt interactions, supports the improved amorphous nature of the film — a key factor in enhancing conductivity results of Ionic conductivity, relaxation time, and dielectric studies, CV have been reported. Interestingly, the specific capacitance exhibited a non-linear trend with current density in GCD analysis, initially decreasing and then increasing, which could be attributed to the interplay between charge storage efficiency and ion accessibility at different current regimes. Impedance analysis has confirmed that the NaAlg/PVA system with 15 wt% of NH4VO3 exhibits the highest ionic conductivity, measuring 0.67 × 10− 5 S cm− 1. Additionally, this optimized blend containing 15 wt% of NH4VO3 resulted in a shift of the peak in the loss tangent plot to higher frequencies, accompanied by a reduced relaxation time of 6.76 × 10− 6 s. The electrochemical properties were further validated through cyclic voltammetry (CV), and the LSV investigation of NP4 showed a breakdown voltage of 1.34 V. This behaviour suggests an adaptive charge-discharge mechanism that may be beneficial in variable-load conditions. Overall, the electrolyte system demonstrates a viable path forward for flexible energy devices, combining mechanical integrity with improved electrochemical performance. Future work may focus on 0optimizing salt concentration and exploring alternative plasticizers or nanofillers to further boost performance for real-world applications.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Dhatarwal, P. & Kumar, D. Structural and electrical properties of PVA:NaBr based solid polymer electrolyte films. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 463, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.03.029 (2017).
Hema, M. & Tamilselvi, K. Effect of ammonium nitrate on PVA–CMC blend polymer electrolytes. Ionics 22 (3), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-015-1567-z (2016).
Chandra, A. & Chandra, S. Ion transport and dielectric relaxation in polymer electrolytes: A review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36 (9), 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001 (2011).
Aziz, S. B. et al. Solid polymer electrolytes based on carboxymethyl cellulose doped with ammonium iodide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132 (10), 41515. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41515 (2015).
Subramanian, V. V. et al. Effect of potassium iodide on the electrical properties of sodium alginate polymer electrolyte. Ionics 20 (4), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-013-1000-5 (2014).
Ali, A. M. M. et al. Dielectric and conductivity analysis of alginate-based polymer electrolytes. J. Polym. Res. 25 (6), 142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1531-3 (2018).
Xue, Z., He, D. & Xie, X. Poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3, 218–19253. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA03471J (2015).
Kumar, S. & Gupta, A. Sodium polymer electrolytes: A review. Batteries 10 (3), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10030073 (2024).
Yao, P. et al. Review on polymer-based composite electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Front. Chem. 7, 522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00522 (2019).
Zheng, J. et al. Progress in gel polymer electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries. Environ. Energy Mater. 2 (2), 12422. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12422 (2023).
Song, Z. et al. A reflection on polymer electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 40609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40609-y (2023).
Yang, J., Sun, Q., Fang, H. & Liu, Y. Safety-enhanced polymer electrolytes for sodium batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 11, 30159–30169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b01239 (2019).
Płocharski, J. Forty years of composite polymer electrolytes. Appl. Phys. A. 130, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-024-08119-w (2025).
Ramesh, S. & Arof, A. K. Electrical conductivity studies of plasticized polymer electrolytes. Mater. Sci. Engineering: B. 137 (3), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2006.10.008 (2007).
Hema, M. & Selvasekarapandian, S. FTIR and AC impedance analysis of plasticized PVA–NH₄Br polymer electrolyte. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 355 (1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.10.027 (2009).
Mohamed, N. S. et al. Electrical conductivity studies on PEO-Based solid polymer electrolytes with ammonium salts. Ionics 14, 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-008-0208-3 (2008).
Ali, A. M. M. et al. Role of ammonium nitrate in biopolymer electrolytes for electrochemical devices. Polym. Bull. 77 (2), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02788-3 (2020).
Vikraman, D. et al. Recent progress in vanadium-based polymer electrolytes for energy storage applications. Ionics 25, 1689–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2694-5 (2019).
Sheha, E. & El-Khodary, A. Structural and electrical characterization of PVA–NH₄VO₃ polymer electrolyte. J. Alloys Compd. 509 (5), 1960–1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.169 (2011).
Kumar, D. & Kumar, V. Low conducting PVA-based electrolytes for electrochemical applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 143 (1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.09.020 (2014).
Armand, M. et al. Polymer electrolytes: Past, present, and future. MRS Bull. 33 (4): 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.75. (2008).
Cyriac, V. et al. Suitability of NaI complexed sodium alginate–polyvinyl alcohol biodegradable polymer blend electrolytes: insights into dielectric relaxations and scaling studies. Solid State Ionics. 411, 116578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2024.116578 (2024).
Vipin Cyriac. et al. Effect of dopant on ion-dynamics of sodium ion-based flexible polyblend electrolyte for electrochemical device application. Mater. Res. Bull. 169, 112498. ISSN 0025-5408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112498 (2024).
Jansi, R. et al. Investigation on polyvinyl alcohol and sodium alginate blend matrix with ammonium nitrate conducting electrolytes for electrochemical applications. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 27 (6), 101743. ISSN 1319–6103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2023.101743 (2023).
Jansi, R. et al. Structural and ionic transport in biopolymer electrolyte-based PVA: NaAlg with NH4Cl for electrochemical applications. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 34, 963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-10302-3 (2023).
Sheela, T. et al. Ionic conductivity studies in crystalline PVA/NaAlg polymer blend electrolyte doped with alkali salt KCl. In AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1591(1). 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4872544 (American Institute of Physics, 2014).
Jansi, R. et al. Solid polymer electrolytes from naalg: PVA: effect of ammonium thiocyanate on ionic conductivity. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 34, 489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-09825-6 (2023).
Sandhiya, M., Vivekanandhan, V. & Pitchaimuthu, S. Unrevealed performance of NH₄VO₃ as a redox-additive for flexible supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C. 125 (15), 8234–8243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c11581 (2021).
Li, K. et al. Research progress on functional solid polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Nanoscale 17, 16560–16591. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NR01513H (2025).
Abdullah, O. G., Aziz, S. B. & Rasheed, M. A. Incorporation of NH4NO3 into MC-PVA blend-based polymer to prepare proton-conducting polymer electrolyte films. Ionics 24, 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2228-1 (2018).
Hemalatha, R. et al. Preparation and characterization of proton-conducting polymer electrolyte based on PVA, amino acid proline, and NH4Cl and its applications to electrochemical devices. Ionics 25, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2564-9 (2019).
Nizam, M. A. H., Fuzlin, A. F. & Samsudin, A. S. Immittance response alginate-polyvinyl alcohol bio-polymer blend electrolytes doped with ammonium iodide. J. Polym. Mater. 42 (1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.32604/jpm.2025.059244 (2025).
Gupta, M. & Ramaswamy, P. G. Glycerol as an efficient plasticizer to increase the DC conductivity and improve the ion transport parameters in biopolymer based electrolytes: XRD, FTIR and EIS studies. Arab. J. Chem. (2022).
Vanitha, N. et al. Effect of graphene quantum dot on sodium alginate with ammonium formate (NH₄HCO₂) biopolymer electrolytes for the application of electrochemical devices. Ionics 28, 2731–2749 (2022).
Hallinan, D. T. & Balsara, N. P. Polymer electrolytes. Annu. Rev. Mater. Research 43, 17–47 (2013).
Aziz, S. S. B., Woo, T. J. & Kadir, M. F. Z. A conceptual review on polymer electrolytes and ion transport models. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. (2018).
Singh, R. K. & Yadav, R. R. Structural and optical characterization of PVA based polymer electrolyte films. Optik 126 (23), 4370–4374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.08.025 (2015).
Arof, A. K. & Ramesh, S. FTIR studies on PVA-Based polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ionics. 143 (1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00956-6 (2001).
Mallepally, R. R. et al. Sodium Alginate-Based polymer electrolytes: FTIR and conductivity studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 92 (2), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.048 (2013).
Hema, M. et al. Influence of ammonium salts on PVA-based polymer electrolytes: FTIR and conductivity analysis. Ionics 22 (3), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-015-1567-z (2016).
Renukappa, N. et al. Ion transport studies in PVA–LiClO₄ polymer electrolytes: A Nyquist analysis. Electrochim. Acta. 55 (15), 4779–4785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.038 (2010).
Nozawa, D. et al. Ionic conductivity enhancement in NaCMC/PVA blend electrolytes with NaI salt: an impedance study. Cellulose 29, 2247–2258 (2022).
Wang, J. & Adams, S. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of PVA based polymer electrolytes: effect of salt concentration. Molecules 28 (4), 1781 (2023).
Smith, A. et al. Blocking electrode effects and ion transport in solid polymer electrolytes. Mater. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5MA00107B (2025).
Faris, B. K. et al. Impedance, electrical equivalent circuit (EEC) modeling, structural (FTIR and XRD), dielectric, and electric modulus study of MC-based ion-conducting solid polymer electrolytes. Materials 15 (1), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010170 (2022).
Abdul Halim, S. I., Chan, C. H. & Apotheker, J. Basics of teaching electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of electrolytes for ion-rechargeable batteries – Part 2: Dielectric response of (non-)polymer electrolytes. Chem. Teacher Int. 3 (2), 11. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0011 (2021).
Jonscher, A. K. The ‘Universal’ dielectric response. Nature 267, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/267673a0 (1977).
Cyriac, V. et al. Ionic conductivity and structural analysis of NaCMC–PVA blend polymer electrolytes. J. Power Sources. 557, 232504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232504 (2023).
Rajendran, S. & Kannan, A. Studies on PVA–NaSCN polymer electrolytes: complexation and ionic conductivity. Mater. Chem. Phys. 74 (2), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00449-2 (2002).
Hema, M. et al. Influence of plasticizer and salt on PVA-based polymer electrolyte systems. Ionics 20 (3), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-013-0982-4 (2014).
Stephan, A. M. Review on electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Eur. Polymer J. 42 (1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.09.017 (2006).
Wieczorek, W. et al. Composite polymeric electrolytes based on PEO, ceramic fillers and lithium salts. Electrochim. Acta. 40 (13–14), 2251–2258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(95)00115-C (1995).
Forsyth, M. et al. Segmental motion and ion transport in polymer electrolytes: A molecular perspective. Nat. Mater. 6 (2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1826 (2007).
Bruce, P. G. & Vincent, C. A. Polymer electrolytes. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89 (17), 3187–3203. https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9938903187 (1993).
Zhang, H. et al. Ion association effects on ionic conductivity in polymer electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 7 (8), 4165–4175. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA10885B (2019).
Nofal, M. M., Aziz, S. B., Saeed, S. R. & Kadir, M. F. Z. Dielectric constant (ε′) and dielectric loss (ε″) values are significantly high at low frequency and decrease as frequency Increases, indicating polarization effects in blend electrolyte systems. Polymers 14 (6), 1120 (2022).
Arya, A. & Sharma, A. L. Addition of Salt Shifts Relaxation Peak in Dielectric Loss toward High Frequency, Indicating Decreased Relaxation Time and Improved Ion Dynamics in Polymer Blends. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03153 (2018).
Abdulkadir, B. A., Arof, A. K., Aziz, S. B. & Hashim, M. Dielectric properties of gel polymer electrolyte based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃). Results Phys. 21, 103858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103858 (2021).
Rathika, R., Padmaraj, O. & Suthanthiraraj, S. A. Electrical conductivity and dielectric relaxation behaviour of PEO/PVdF-based solid polymer blend electrolytes for zinc battery applications. Ionics 24 (1), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2175-x (2018).
Mydhili, V. & Manivannan, S. Electrochemical and dielectric behavior in poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) blend for energy storage applications. Polym. Bull. 76, 4735–4752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2630-5 (2019).
Rajan, J., Vinay, B., Revathy, M. S., Sasikumar, P. & Hossain, M. K. Dielectric and electrical studies of sodium alginate-based polymer electrolytes incorporated with metal salts. Mater. Chem. Phys. 242, 122523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122523 (2020).
Ramesh, S., Lu, S. C. & Arof, A. K. Dielectric behavior of poly(vinyl chloride)-based polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ionics. 178 (9–10), 1161–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2007.03.026 (2007).
Sundaramahalingam, A. & Ramesh, S. Dielectric relaxation and electrical conductivity studies of PVA–NaNO₃ based polymer electrolytes for energy storage devices. Ionics 28, 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-021-04311-7 (2022).
Aziz, S. B. et al. Electrochemical properties of plasticized PVA-based electrolyte inserted with alumina nanoparticles for EDLC application with enhanced dielectric constant. J. Energy Storage 103 Part. A , 114264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.114264 (2024).
Wang, J. & Johnson, C. S. A practical beginner’s guide to cyclic voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 94 (7), 881–886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00164 (2017).
Conway, B. E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications (Springer, 1999).
Aziz, S. B. et al. Nofal electrochemical characteristics of PVA-Based polymer electrolytes containing vanadate salts for supercapacitor applications. Electrochim. Acta. 354, 136722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136722 (2020).
Pandey, G. & Shukla, A.K. Polymer electrolyte-based supercapacitors: A review. J. Power Sources. 327, 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.064 (2016).
Na, R., Gao, G. & Zhang, Y. Pseudocapacitive behavior of Vanadium-Based materials: fundamentals and applications. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 (12), 7071–7096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01458 (2018).
Aricò, A. S., Bruce, P., Scrosati, B., Tarascon, J. M. & van Schalkwijk, W. Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Mater. 4 (5), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1368 (2005).
Mohapatra, S.R. & Supriya S. Ray Polyvinyl alcohol based blend polymer electrolytes for energy storage devices. Electrochim. Acta. 283, 1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.026 (2018).
Zhang, H. & Bruce, P. G. Pseudocapacitive contributions in polymer and redox-active composite supercapacitors. Nat. Reviews Mater. 1, 15005. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2015.5 (2015).
Trasatti, S. & Conway, B. E. Electrochemical supercapacitors: kinetic and thermodynamic considerations. J. Electroanal. Chem. 300 (1–2), 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(91)85123-W (1991).
Samsudin, A. S., Ghazali, N. M., Mazuki, N. F., Aoki, K. & Nagao, Y. The ionic conductivity and electrochemical performance of alginate–PVA based polymer electrolyte with Li⁺ charge carriers for supercapacitor. J. Electroanal. Chem. 967, 118463 (2024).
Nizam, M. A. H., Mazuki, N. F., Ghazali, N. M. & Samsudin, A. S. Enhancing the ionic conduction properties of alginate–PVA biopolymer blend electrolytes doped with NH₄I. In Ionics (Elsevier, 2025).
Bargav, P. B., Mohan, V., Sharma, M. A. K. & V. V. R. N.o. Polymer electrolytes for supercapacitors. Polymers 16(22), 3164 (2022).
Chen, Q., Zhao, X., Liu, Z., Liu, X. & Wu, Z. Binary solvent-reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate double-network hydrogel as a highly ion-conducting, resilient, and self-healing gel polymer electrolyte for flexible supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta. 500, 143626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.143626 (2024).
Marf, A. S., Aziz, S. B. & Abdullah, R. M. Plasticized H+ ion-conducting PVA:CS-based polymer blend electrolytes for energy storage EDLC application. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 31, 18554–18568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04399-z) (2020).
Nandhinilakshmi, M. et al. Fabrication of symmetric super capacitor using lithium-ion conducting IOTA carrageenan-based biopolymer electrolytes. J. Polym. Environ. 32, 1150–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-02303014-6 (2024).
Cholant, C. M. et al. Study of the conductivity of solid polymeric electrolyte based on PVA/GA blend with addition of acetic acid. J. Solid State Electrochem. 24, 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-020-04605-2 (2020).
Kiran Kumar, K. et al. Investigations on PEO/PVP/NaBr complexed polymer blend electrolytes for electrochemical cell applications. J. Membr. Sci. 454, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.022 (2014).
Shujahadeen, B. et al. Impedance, FTIR and transport properties of plasticized proton conducting biopolymer electrolyte based on Chitosan for electrochemical device application. Results Phys. 29, 104770. ISSN 2211–3797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104770 (2021).
Ong, A. C. W. et al. Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes comprising starch-lithium acetate and titania for all-solid-state supercapacitor. Ionics 27, 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-020-03856-3 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the International Research Centre of Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education for providing facilities and fellowships to carry out the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M. Elakkiya, R. Jansi, M. S. Revathy, J.Kanimozhi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing; Manikandan Ayyar, Saravanan Rajendran: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing; M. S. Revathy, Prabhu Paramasivam, mohamed Yusuf: Validation, Visualization, and Writing – review & editing; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The manuscript has been submitted with the consent and acknowledgment of all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Elakkiya, M., Jansi, R., Revathy, M.S. et al. Ionic transport of proton-conducting ammonium vanadate salt in blends of polyvinyl alcohol and sodium alginate for electrochemical applications. Sci Rep 16, 1271 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31055-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31055-5















