Table 4 Image brightness equalization performance of each algorithm.
From: Low-light color image equalization based on adaptive brightness adjustment
Dynamic light scenarios | Evaluation indicators | BPDHE | NPE | This study | Original image | Literature11 | Literature12 | Literature37 | Literature38 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local irradiation by moving light sources | Mean gradient | 19.83 | 22.56 | 26.98 | 13.25 | 24.17 | 25.32 | 24.85 | 25.19 |
VIF | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.87 | |
EME | 9.82 | 10.75 | 13.56 | 6.21 | 11.63 | 12.28 | 11.97 | 12.43 | |
BRISQUE | 42.85 | 39.62 | 31.89 | 59.34 | 36.51 | 34.27 | 35.82 | 34.95 | |
ΔL | 28.63 | 22.45 | 9.87 | 85.21 | 18.72 | 15.36 | 17.52 | 16.18 | |
ETS | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.83 | |
Processing time/ms | 72.35 | 68.42 | 85.06 | / | 95.17 | 89.63 | 102.58 | 98.76 | |
Sudden light-dark change caused by instant occlusion | Mean gradient | 18.65 | 21.34 | 26.23 | 12.78 | 23.85 | 24.91 | 24.36 | 24.78 |
VIF | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.86 | |
EME | 9.21 | 10.38 | 12.89 | 5.87 | 11.25 | 11.97 | 11.52 | 12.15 | |
BRISQUE | 44.17 | 40.83 | 32.65 | 60.12 | 37.29 | 35.12 | 36.95 | 35.78 | |
ΔL | 32.15 | 25.78 | 11.24 | 92.56 | 20.43 | 17.69 | 19.23 | 18.05 | |
ETS | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.81 | |
Processing Time/ms | 75.62 | 71.38 | 87.32 | / | 98.45 | 92.17 | 105.32 | 101.45 | |
Direct irradiation by sudden strong light | Mean Gradient | 17.92 | 20.18 | 25.76 | 11.93 | 22.63 | 23.85 | 23.17 | 23.59 |
VIF | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.84 | |
EME | 8.95 | 9.87 | 12.47 | 5.43 | 10.72 | 11.35 | 11.03 | 11.68 | |
BRISQUE | 45.32 | 42.19 | 33.91 | 62.47 | 38.67 | 36.58 | 37.92 | 37.15 | |
ΔL | 35.87 | 28.92 | 13.56 | 105.38 | 23.15 | 19.84 | 21.67 | 20.32 | |
ETS | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.29 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.79 | |
Processing Time/ms | 78.15 | 74.63 | 89.65 | / | 102.38 | 95.72 | 108.65 | 104.23 |