Table 3 Performance comparison on Kanpur Nagar dataset.
Metric | Variant | MLP | SVR | RF | XGB | AHELM | TBLSSVR | MHKLDMR | EM-LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAE | T | 3.4939 | 5.4019 | 3.5409 | 3.5686 | 3.2891 | 5.8344 | 3.7247 | 3.1295 |
T+W | 3.4751 | 4.7037 | 3.6260 | 3.8020 | 4.3143 | 9.9660 | 4.5408 | 3.1530 | |
T+W+FS | 3.3823 | 3.8566 | 3.6643 | 3.7375 | 3.3577 | 5.7006 | 3.4765 | 3.1064 | |
RMSE | T | 4.6885 | 6.8488 | 4.8538 | 4.9119 | 4.2275 | 6.9429 | 4.6651 | 4.2251 |
T+W | 4.7668 | 6.0298 | 4.9848 | 5.1385 | 5.8529 | 11.2331 | 5.9643 | 4.2890 | |
T+W+FS | 4.5576 | 5.1448 | 5.0053 | 5.0545 | 4.3494 | 7.2375 | 4.5425 | 4.2088 | |
MAPE | T | 0.6064 | 4.7768 | 0.5751 | 0.5841 | 0.4197 | 0.6325 | 0.4712 | 0.4199 |
T+W | 0.6008 | 5.8697 | 0.6058 | 0.6480 | 0.2998 | 0.8185 | 0.4459 | 0.4387 | |
T+W+FS | 0.5472 | 1.4932 | 0.6185 | 0.6376 | 0.4791 | 0.5309 | 0.4725 | 0.4226 | |
MBE | T | – 1.8477 | – 4.9832 | – 2.3784 | – 2.5247 | – 1.5338 | – 3.9967 | – 1.7092 | – 0.7667 |
T+W | – 1.9244 | – 3.4966 | – 2.5995 | – 2.8067 | 0.1807 | – 9.9408 | – 2.0068 | – 0.9963 | |
T+W+FS | – 1.7471 | – 1.8809 | – 2.6064 | – 2.6814 | – 0.1909 | – 5.3237 | – 0.5884 | – 0.8628 |
