Table 5 Performance comparison on Varanasi dataset.
Metric | Variant | MLP | SVR | RF | XGB | AHELM | TBLSSVR | MHKLDMR | EM-LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAE | T | 2.9232 | 3.3967 | 2.6476 | 2.5965 | 2.8784 | 3.9126 | 2.7891 | 2.5376 |
T+W | 2.8127 | 3.7638 | 2.6929 | 2.5748 | 3.1191 | 6.7783 | 3.6611 | 2.5508 | |
T+W+FS | 2.7054 | 3.6630 | 2.6698 | 2.5748 | 2.8056 | 3.7242 | 2.8279 | 2.5784 | |
RMSE | T | 3.9277 | 4.4677 | 3.6117 | 3.5491 | 3.6228 | 5.0845 | 3.7433 | 3.4386 |
T+W | 3.8367 | 4.8692 | 3.6804 | 3.5251 | 4.0324 | 7.8700 | 4.7504 | 3.4162 | |
T+W+FS | 3.6013 | 4.7013 | 3.6379 | 3.5251 | 3.7975 | 4.8589 | 3.7381 | 3.4087 | |
MAPE | T | 0.8064 | 3.1183 | 0.5715 | 0.5309 | 0.5067 | 0.6658 | 0.5443 | 0.4757 |
T+W | 0.6800 | 4.8768 | 0.5994 | 0.5242 | 0.5966 | 0.8046 | 0.5257 | 0.4728 | |
T+W+FS | 0.5694 | 3.1449 | 0.5809 | 0.5242 | 4.1941 | 5.0274 | 4.2103 | 0.4775 | |
MBE | T | – 1.7024 | – 1.9599 | – 1.2159 | – 0.9864 | – 0.9771 | – 2.8415 | – 1.1812 | – 0.4400 |
T+W | – 1.3962 | –2.7026 | – 1.4105 | – 0.9610 | 0.3580 | – 6.7566 | – 1.9198 | – 0.4340 | |
T+W+FS | – 0.8426 | – 2.7866 | – 1.2752 | – 0.9610 | – 0.3106 | – 3.0897 | – 0.5785 | -0.2933 |
