Abstract
Disorders of consciousness (DoC), including vegetative state (VS), unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), and minimally conscious state (MCS), are characterized by impaired consciousness and have limited therapeutic options. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) on the efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) for DoC. A systematic literature search identified studies on the use of VNS in patients with DoC. IPD were extracted from included studies and pooled for analysis. The primary outcome was improvement in consciousness, assessed clinically using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). A total of 10 studies including 112 patients were identified. VNS was associated with significant improvements in consciousness, with a mean increase of 2.78 (95% CI 1.62 to 3.94) in CRS-R. 40.2% of patients demonstrated an improvement in CRS-R score above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 3 or more. Patients in MCS improved more than those in coma or VS/UWS. This IPD meta-analysis provides early evidence for the efficacy of VNS in improving consciousness in patients with DoC. Our results imply the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials for both invasive and non-invasive VNS to better inform its role in DoC neuro-recovery.
Data availability
The data used for analysis in this paper are all publicly available from the included studies. There is no additional data used available for sharing. For data enquiry and requests, please contact the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- BAEP:
-
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials
- CBF:
-
Cerebral blood flow
- CRS-R:
-
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
- DBS:
-
Deep brain stimulation
- DMN:
-
Default mode network
- DoC:
-
Disorders of consciousness
- EEG:
-
Electroencephalogram
- eMCS:
-
Emergence from a minimally conscious state (eMCS)
- fMRI:
-
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
- HIE:
-
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
- IPD:
-
Individual participant data
- iVNS:
-
Invasive vagus nerve stimulation
- MCID:
-
Minimal clinically significant difference
- MCS:
-
Minimally conscious state
- rTMS:
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- SCS:
-
Spinal cord stimulation
- SEP:
-
Somatosensory evoked potentials
- taVNS:
-
Transcutaneous auricular VNS
- TBI:
-
Traumatic brain injury
- tDCS:
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation
- UWS:
-
Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
- VNMM:
-
Vagus nerve magnetic modulation
- VNS:
-
Vagal nerve stimulation
References
Eapen, B. C., Georgekutty, J., Subbarao, B., Bavishi, S. & Cifu, D. X. Disorders of consciousness. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 28, 245–258 (2017).
Formisano, R., Aloisi, M. & Contrada, M. Chapter 16 - Post-coma syndrome in the context of severe acquired brain injury: traumatic brain injury and beyond. In Diagnosis and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (eds. Rajendram, R. et al.) 205–219 (Academic Press, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823347-4.00029-4.
Giacino, J. T. et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline Development, Dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American academy of Neurology; the American Congress of rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, independent Living, and rehabilitation research. Neurology 91, 450–460 (2018).
Llorens, R. et al. Minimally conscious state plus versus minus: likelihood of emergence and long-term functional independence. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 11, 719–728 (2024).
Bruno, M. A. et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J. Neurol. 259, 1087–1098 (2012).
Giacino, J. T., Kalmar, K. & Whyte, J. The JFK coma recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 2020–2029 (2004).
Cauda, F. et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 80, 429–431 (2009).
Laureys, S. et al. Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. NeuroImage 9, 377–382 (1999).
Soddu, A. et al. Identifying the default-mode component in Spatial IC analyses of patients with disorders of consciousness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 778–796 (2012).
Boly, M. et al. Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2393–2400 (2009).
Septien, S. & Rubin, M. A. Disorders of consciousness: ethical issues of diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication. Semin Neurol. 38, 548–554 (2018).
Thibaut, A., Schiff, N., Giacino, J., Laureys, S. & Gosseries, O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 18, 600–614 (2019).
Gosseries, O. et al. Amantadine, apomorphine and Zolpidem in the treatment of disorders of consciousness. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20, 4167–4184 (2014).
Hu, Y. et al. The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on disorder of consciousness in patients with brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Brain Res. 1822, 148633 (2024).
Chudy, D. et al. Deep brain stimulation in disorders of consciousness: 10 years of a single center experience. Sci. Rep. 13, 19491 (2023).
Huang, W. et al. Clinical effect of short-term spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of patients with primary brainstem hemorrhage-induced disorders of consciousness. Front. Neurol. 14, 2563 (2023).
Möbius, H. & Welkoborsky, H. J. Vagus nerve stimulation for conservative therapy-refractive epilepsy and depression. Laryngorhinootologie 101, S114–S143 (2022).
Babar, N. & Giedrimiene, D. Updates on baroreflex activation therapy and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiol. Res. 13, 11–17 (2022).
Kamel, L. Y., Xiong, W., Gott, B. M., Kumar, A. & Conway, C. R. Vagus nerve stimulation: an update on a novel treatment for treatment-resistant depression. J. Neurol. Sci. 434, 120171 (2022).
Fornaro, R., Actis, G. C., Caviglia, G. P., Pitoni, D. & Ribaldone, D. G. Inflammatory bowel disease: role of vagus nerve stimulation. J. Clin. Med. 11, 253 (2022).
Gargus, M. et al. Mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders: a focus on microglia and neuroinflammation. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1527842 (2024).
Corazzol, M. et al. Restoring consciousness with vagus nerve stimulation. Curr. Biol. CB. 27, R994–R996 (2017).
Yu, Y. T. et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in disorders of consciousness monitored by fMRI: the first case report. Brain Stimul.b10, 328–330 (2017).
Noé, E. et al. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in a cohort of patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimulat. 13, 427–429 (2020).
Hakon, J. et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A feasibility trial. Neuromodul. J. Int. Neuromodul. Soc. 23, 859–864 (2020).
Dong, X., Tang, Y., Zhou, Y. & Feng, Z. Stimulation of vagus nerve for patients with disorders of consciousness: a systematic review. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1257378 (2023).
Johnson, R. L. & Wilson, C. G. A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. J. Inflamm. Res. 11, 203–213 (2018).
Liu, C. Y. et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for stroke: implantation experience from the VNS-REHAB trial. J. Clin. Neurosci. Off J. Neurosurg. Soc. Australas. 105, 122–128 (2022).
González, H. F. J., Yengo-Kahn, A. & Englot, D. J. Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Neurosurg. Clin. N Am. 30, 219–230 (2019).
Ben-Menachem, E. Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off Publ Am. Electroencephalogr. Soc. 18, 415–418 (2001).
Kim, A. Y. et al. Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 12, 22055 (2022).
Wang, L. et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulators: a review of past, present, and future devices. Expert Rev. Med. Dev. 19, 43–61 (2022).
Wang, L. et al. Preliminary study of vagus nerve magnetic modulation in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 18, 2171–2179 (2022).
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210 (2016).
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. & Rothstein, H. R. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 1, 97–111 (2010).
Lee, K. S. et al. Tenets for the proper conduct and use of Meta-Analyses: a practical guide for neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg. 161, 291–302e1 (2022).
Nyaga, V. N., Arbyn, M. & Aerts, M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch. Public. Health Arch. Belg. Sante Publique. 72, 39 (2014).
Osińska, A. et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in treatment of disorders of Consciousness - Longitudinal case study. Front. Neurosci. 16, 834507 (2022).
Xiang, X. J. et al. The clinical effect of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of patients with a minimally conscious state. J. Neurorestoratol. 8, 160–171 (2020).
Yu, Y. et al. Cerebral hemodynamic correlates of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation in consciousness restoration: an Open-Label pilot study. Front. Neurol. 12, 684791 (2021).
Zhou, Y. F., Kang, J. W., Xiong, Q., Feng, Z. & Dong, X. Y. Transauricular vagus nerve stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Front. Neurol. 14, 1133893 (2023).
Zhou, Y. et al. The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for patients with minimally conscious state: a sham-controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1323079 (2023).
Briand, M. M., Gosseries, O., Staumont, B., Laureys, S. & Thibaut, A. Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation and disorders of consciousness: A hypothesis for mechanisms of action. Front. Neurol. 11, 933 (2020).
KERR, F. W. Structural relation of the trigeminal spinal tract to upper cervical roots and the solitary nucleus in the Cat. Exp. Neurol. 4, 134–148 (1961).
Grzanna, R. & Fritschy, J. M. Efferent projections of different subpopulations of central noradrenaline neurons. Prog Brain Res. 88, 89–101 (1991).
Aston-Jones, G. et al. Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and Pharmacology. Prog Brain Res. 88, 47–75 (1991).
Jean, A. [The nucleus tractus solitarius: neuroanatomic, neurochemical and functional aspects]. Arch. Int. Physiol. Biochim. Biophys. 99, A3–52 (1991).
Ventura-Bort, C. et al. Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on the P300 and Alpha-Amylase level: A pilot study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 202 (2018).
Warren, C. M. et al. The neuromodulatory and hormonal effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as evidenced by salivary alpha amylase, salivary cortisol, pupil diameter, and the P3 event-related potential. Brain Stimulat. 12, 635–642 (2019).
Cao, J., Lu, K. H., Powley, T. L. & Liu, Z. Vagal nerve stimulation triggers widespread responses and alters large-scale functional connectivity in the rat brain. PloS One. 12, e0189518 (2017).
J Chandler, D., W Gao, J. & D Waterhouse, B. Heterogeneous organization of the locus coeruleus projections to prefrontal and motor cortices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 111, 6816–6821 (2014).
Berridge, C. W. & Waterhouse, B. D. The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 42, 33–84 (2003).
Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450 (2005).
Bouret, S. & Richmond, B. J. Sensitivity of locus ceruleus neurons to reward value for goal-directed actions. J. Neurosci. Off J. Soc. Neurosci. 35, 4005–4014 (2015).
Zerbi, V. et al. Rapid reconfiguration of the functional connectome after chemogenetic locus coeruleus activation. Neuron 103, 702–718e5 (2019).
Giorgi, A. et al. Brain-wide mapping of endogenous serotonergic transmission via chemogenetic fMRI. Cell. Rep. 21, 910–918 (2017).
Hahn, A. et al. Differential modulation of the default mode network via serotonin-1A receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 109, 2619–2624 (2012).
Conio, B. et al. Opposite effects of dopamine and serotonin on resting-state networks: review and implications for psychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 25, 82–93 (2020).
Dietrich, S. et al. A novel transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation leads to brainstem and cerebral activations measured by functional MRI. Biomed. Tech. (Berl). 53, 104–111 (2008).
Yakunina, N., Kim, S. S. & Nam, E. C. Optimization of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation using functional MRI. Neuromodul. J. Int. Neuromodul. Soc. 20, 290–300 (2017).
Monti, M. M., Spivak, N. M., Edlow, B. L. & Bodien, Y. G. What is a minimal clinically important difference for clinical trials in patients with disorders of consciousness? A novel probabilistic approach. PloS One. 18, e0290290 (2023).
Bodien, Y. G. et al. Cognitive motor dissociation in disorders of consciousness. N Engl. J. Med. 391, 598–608 (2024).
Egbebike, J. et al. Cognitive-motor dissociation and time to functional recovery in patients with acute brain injury in the USA: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 21, 704–713 (2022).
Wannez, S., Heine, L., Thonnard, M., Gosseries, O. & Laureys, S. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 81, 883–889 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.J.Y.Z., Y.T.L. and K.S.C. conceived the manuscript idea and designed the research study. J.J.Y.Z., Y.T.L., A.W., J.Y., E.S., and Z.Z. performed the data collection. J.J.Y.Z. and Y.T.L. analysed and interpreted the data. Y.T.L. prepared Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. J.J.Y.Z. and Y.T.L. wrote and the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed and critically revised the manuscript. Y.T.L., M.J.R.L. and K.S.C supervised the conduct of this study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J.J., Lo, Y., Wee, A. et al. An individual patient data meta-analysis on vagal nerve stimulation for recovery from disorders of consciousness. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32369-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32369-0