Table 8 Comparison of two RNA extraction methods for HA and NA classification using the portable system on sample set 3 with known AIV subtype (H7N6). Subtypes were characterised by manually mapping to a non-redundant reference gene set downloaded from GISAID. [+++] indicates the average depth of coverage is above quality threshold of > 30x. [—] indicates the average depth of coverage is below 30x and hence did not pass the quality threshold for generating a consensus sequence.

From: Development of a portable avian influenza virus characterisation system: bringing the inside-out

Sample No.

Sample Name

RNA extraction kit

Type of sample

GISAID mapping

HA average depth of coverage

NA average depth of coverage

13a

W24_02663-1

QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit

Oropharyngeal

H7

N6

+++ (109.3x)

+++ (494.5x)

14a

W24_02665-7

Oropharyngeal

H7

N6

+++ (150.4x)

+++ (625.4x)

15a

W24_02665-10

Cloacal

H7

N6

+++ (149.6x)

+++ (524.3x)

16a

W24_02665-5

Oropharyngeal

H7

N6

+++ (245.2x)

+++ (452.1x)

17a

W24_02665-4

Cloacal

H7

N6

+++ (39.4x)

+++ (216.4x)

Number of samples successfully characterised as H7 or N6

5/5 (100%)

5/5 (100%)

95% Confidence Interval

56.55–99.49

47.82–100

13b

W24_02663-1b

Zymo Quick-RNA viral kit

Oropharyngeal

H7

N6

+++ (419.3x)

+++ (990.9x)

14b

W24_02665-7b

Oropharyngeal

H7

N6

+++ (100.8x)

+++ (537.2x)

15b

W24_02665-10b

Cloacal

Low read

N6

— (28.5x)

+++ (275.9x)

16b

W24_02665-5b

Oropharyngeal

Low read

Low read

— (N/A)

— (N/A)

17b

W24_02665-4b

Cloacal

Low read

Low read

— (N/A)

— (N/A)

Number of samples successfully characterised as H7 or N6

2/5 (40%)

3/5 (60%)

95% Confidence Interval

5.27–85.34

14.66–94.73