Table 2 Cox proportional hazards analysis of overall survival by metastatic site.

From: Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies by metastatic site in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Variables

Multivariate

Lymph node

Lung

Bone

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Age

0.95 (0.91–0.99)

0.01

1.01 (0.97–1.06)

0.56

1.01 (0.96–1.05)

0.84

IMDC (poor vs intermediate)

2.51 (0.59–10.66)

0.21

2.24 (0.83–6.03)

0.11

0.94 (0.34–2.63)

0.91

1st line therapy (IO–TKI vs IO–IO)

1.84 (0.59–5.69)

0.29

1.43 (0.52–3.94)

0.49

0.37 (0.13–1.02)

0.055

KPS (<80 vs 80)

9.26 (1.79–47.9)

0.008

1.19 (0.25–5.67)

0.83

1.61 (0.55–4.74)

0.38

Variables

Multivariate

Liver

Liver and/or bone

Brain

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

P-value

Age

1.00 (0.89-1.12)

0.97

0.98 (0.95-1.00)

0.06

0.99 (0.90-1.09)

0.82

IMDC (poor vs intermediate)

1.89 (0.48-7.50)

0.36

2.71 (1.53-4.83)

0.0007

11.23 (0.44-283.7)

0.14

1st line therapy (IO–TKI vs IO–IO)

0.14 (0.02-0.86)

0.033

0.40 (0.22-0.73)

0.003

3.98 (0.42-37.3)

0.23

KPS (<80 vs 80)

0.65 (0.08-5.52)

0.69

0.48 (0.22-1.04)

0.06

9.42 (0.83-106.9)

0.07

  1. IMDC, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; IO, immuno-oncology; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status.