Table 3 Comparison of the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness (SE) of Fe3O4@RGO/PDAP composites with previously reported polymer-based systems in the X-band frequency range (8–12 GHz).
Matrix | Filler | Filler Loading (%) | Thickness (mm) | Freq.Range (GHz) | SE(dB) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVA | Fe3O4@RGO | 35 wt % | 3 | 8–12 | − 15 | |
PVC | 10 wt% | 1.8 | − 13 | |||
PS | 2.24 v% | – | − 30 | |||
PU | 25 wt% | 6 | − 23.2 | |||
PDAP | 5 wt% | 5 | − 13.2 | This work | ||
PDAP | 15 wt% | 5 | − 22.3 | |||
PDAP | 25 wt% | 5 | − 31.5 | |||
PP | MWCNT | 30 wt% | – | − 40.3 | ||
PU | Ni, Co@MWCNT | 25 wt% | – | 18-26.5 | − 35 | |
EOC | MWCNT | 10 wt% | 2 | 8–12 | − 25.5 | |
Epoxy | RGO-SWCNT | 15 wt% | – | 1–18 | − 50 | |
PMMA-PVDF | RGO | 4 wt% | – | 8–12 | − 33.3 | |
Carbon fiber fabrics | Ag-RGO | 5 wt% | – | 8–12 | − 22.68 |
