Table 10 Third layer displacement seismic response.
Parameter | Working conditions | Input seismic waves | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
EL | Taft | Lanzhou artificial wave | ||
Damping effect of dampers under different working conditions (PGA = 0.2 g) | ||||
Floor 2 story drift damping effect % (displacement / mm) | Original framework | (2.53) | (3.35) | (1.31) |
Working conditions 1 | 45% (1.4) | 76% (0.8) | 42% (0.82) | |
Working conditions 2 | 77% (0.57) | 84% (0.51) | 74% (0.33) | |
Working conditions 3 | 69% (0.76) | 81% (0.61) | 44% (0.73) | |
Working conditions 4 | 72% (0.7) | 85% (0.5) | 58% (0.55) | |
Damping effect of dampers under different working conditions (PGA = 0.4 g) | ||||
Floor 3 story drift damping effect % (displacement / mm) | Original framework | (4.42) | (3.44) | (2.29) |
Working conditions 1 | 51% (2.14) | 57% (1.49) | 58% (1.19) | |
Working conditions 2 | 60% (1.75) | 77% (0.79) | 79% (0.58) | |
Working conditions 3 | 70% (1.31) | 64% (1.23) | 58% (0.95) | |
Working conditions 4 | 71% (1.28) | 69% (1.07) | 65% (0.93) | |
Damping effect of dampers under different working conditions (PGA = 0.8 g) | ||||
Floor 3 story drift damping effect % (displacement / mm) | Original framework | (6.83) | (5.59) | (5.26) |
Working conditions 1 | 53% (3.21) | 47% (2.95) | 54% (2.39) | |
Working conditions 2 | 67% (2.22) | 65% (1.95) | 67% (1.72) | |
Working conditions 3 | 65% (2.37) | 55% (2.51) | 57% (2.24) | |
Working conditions 4 | 66% (2.35) | 58% (2.36) | 58% (2.17) | |
Damping effect of dampers under different working conditions (PGA = 1.0 g) | ||||
Floor 3 story drift damping effect % (displacement / mm) | Original framework | (6.93) | (4.87) | (6.93) |
Working conditions 1 | 59% (2.82) | 52% (2.34) | 53% (3.24) | |
Working conditions 2 | 62% (2.63) | 48% (2.53) | 65% (2.45) | |
Working conditions 3 | 68% (2.19) | 36% (3.10) | 60% (2.78) | |
Working conditions 4 | 63% (2.53) | 57% (2.07) | 55% (3.12) | |
