Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Quantification and characterization of manufactured nanomaterials shed from face masks
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 February 2026

Quantification and characterization of manufactured nanomaterials shed from face masks

  • R. Mehri1,
  • Z. Gajdosechova1,
  • T. A. Sipkens1,
  • G. J. Smallwood1,
  • A. M. Belknap2,
  • D. Vladisavljevic2 &
  • …
  • J. C. Corbin1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Health care
  • Materials science
  • Microbiology
  • Nanoscience and technology

Abstract

Face masks are an important public health measure whose use became wide-spread during the pandemic. Manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) have been incorporated into face masks to enhance their anti-microbial and self-cleaning properties. However, the potential toxicity of certain MNMs raises concerns regarding their use in facemasks. Limited research has addressed the airborne shedding potential of MNMs as it relates to inhalation uptake. This work aimed to address this gap by investigating the potential airborne release of TiO2 from the outer surface of three general purpose face masks, under two sets of conditions: physically stable and physically agitated. The surface of the face masks was analyzed to determine the mass fraction of TiO2 and the composition of the particles detected. Particle shedding was quantified via particle counters, particle sizers, electron microscopy, and inductively-coupled-plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Compositional analysis showed that all tested masks contained different levels of Ti ranging from 80 to 4870 µg/g of mask, with TiO2 particles detected on the surface of the fibers. Particle shedding was observed only for two of the masks under agitation with low average concentrations of 130 and 520 #/cm3. Further analysis of the shed particles did not indicate the presence of TiO2 nanoparticles. Overall, these findings suggest that while TiO2 was present in the face masks, its airborne release under typical conditions may be unlikely. Although additional efforts are needed to characterize a wider range of facemasks and expand on these data, this study contributes to the understanding of inhalation uptake from MNMs shedding to inform future risk assessments.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Palmieri, V., De Maio, F., De Spirito, M. & Papi, M. Face masks and nanotechnology: Keep the blue side up. Nano Today 37, 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101077 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Atab, N., Mishra, R. B. & Hussain, M. M. Toward nanotechnology-enabled face masks against SARS-CoV-2 and pandemic respiratory diseases. Nanotechnology 33, 062006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac3578 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez, A. et al. Durable nanocomposite face masks with high particulate filtration and rapid inactivation of coronaviruses. Sci. Rep. 11, 24318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03771-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed, O. B. & Alamro, T. Evaluation of the antibacterial activities of face masks coated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 12, 18739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23615-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maher, A., Abdo, M. S. & Abdo, H. S. Nanotechnology-Enhanced Face Masks: Future Scopes and Perspectives. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1497910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1497910 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stokes, K. et al. Enhanced Medical and Community Face Masks with Antimicrobial Properties: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 10, 4066 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foster, H. A., Ditta, I. B., Varghese, S. & Steele, A. Photocatalytic disinfection using titanium dioxide: spectrum and mechanism of antimicrobial activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90, 1847–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3213-7 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dizaj, S. M., Lotfipour, F., Barzegar-Jalali, M., Zarrintan, M. H. & Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C 44, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rai, M. K., Deshmukh, S. D., Ingle, A. P. & Gade, A. K. Silver nanoparticles: the powerful nanoweapon against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05253.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Durán, N. et al. Silver nanoparticles: A new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 12, 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.016 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marambio-Jones, C. & Hoek, E. M. V. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J. Nanoparticle Res. 12, 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-9900-y (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prabhu, S. & Poulose, E. K. Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int. Nano Lett. 2, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/2228-5326-2-32 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tran, Q. H., Nguyen, V. Q. & Le, A.-T. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, toxicology, applications and perspectives. Adv. Natural Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 4, 033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/033001 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, L. et al. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, and therapeutic applications. Drug Discovery Today 20, 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.014 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Everaert, S. et al. Do We Need Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles in Face Masks? Toxics 13 (2025).

  16. Verleysen, E. et al. Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control. Sci. Rep. 12, 2529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06605-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skocaj, M., Filipic, M., Petkovic, J. & Novak, S. Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe?. Radiol. Oncol. 45, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10019-011-0037-0 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ge, L. et al. Nanosilver particles in medical applications: synthesis, performance, and toxicity. Int. J. Nanomed. 9, 2399–2407. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S55015 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kisielinski, K. et al. Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins – A scoping review. Ecotoxicology and Environ. Safety 275, 115858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115858 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meier, P. et al. Evaluation of fiber and debris release from protective COVID-19 mask textiles and in vitro acute cytotoxicity effects. Environ. Int. 167, 107364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107364 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noël, A. et al. Mass or total surface area with aerosol size distribution as exposure metrics for inflammatory, cytotoxic and oxidative lung responses in rats exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Toxicol. Ind. Health 33, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233716651560 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, J. et al. Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicology Lett. 168, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.12.001 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Donaldson, K. et al. The Biologically Effective Dose in Inhalation Nanotoxicology. Accounts Chem. Res. 46, 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300092y (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kreyling, W. G. et al. Quantitative biokinetics of titanium dioxide nanoparticles after intratracheal instillation in rats: Part 3. Nanotoxicology 11, 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.1306894 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shi, H., Magaye, R., Castranova, V. & Zhao, J. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-15 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Susan, W. P. et al. Geertsma Nano-silver – a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology 3 (2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390902725914 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sullivan, G. L., Delgado-Gallardo, J., Watson, T. M. & Sarp, S. An investigation into the leaching of micro and nano particles and chemical pollutants from disposable face masks - linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Water Res. 196, 117033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117033 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Delgado-Gallardo, J. et al. Disposable FFP2 and Type IIR Medical-Grade Face Masks: An Exhaustive Analysis into the Leaching of Micro- and Nanoparticles and Chemical Pollutants Linked to the COVID-19 Pandemic. ACS ES&T Water 2, 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.1c00319 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, L., Zhao, X., Li, Z. & Song, K. COVID-19: Performance study of microplastic inhalation risk posed by wearing masks. J. Hazardous Mater. 411, 124955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124955 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bussan, D. D., Snaychuk, L., Bartzas, G. & Douvris, C. Quantification of trace elements in surgical and KN95 face masks widely used during the SARS-COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 814, 151924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151924 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Montalvo, D., Mercier, G. M., Mast, J. & Cheyns, K. Release of silver and titanium from face masks traded for the general population. Sci. Total Environ. 901, 165616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165616 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suwanroek, W., Sumranjit, J., Wutikhun, T. & Siripinyanond, A. Use of single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the study of zinc oxide nanoparticles released from fabric face masks. J. Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 37, 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1JA00447F (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pollard, Z. A., Karod, M. & Goldfarb, J. L. Metal leaching from antimicrobial cloth face masks intended to slow the spread of COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 11, 19216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98577-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mast, J. et al. Identification, Physicochemical Characterisation And Preliminary Risk Analysis Of Titanium Dioxide Particles In Face Masks. 49 (Sciensano, 2021).

  35. Presto, A. A., Saha, P. K. & Robinson, A. L. Past, present, and future of ultrafine particle exposures in North America. Atmospheric Environ.: X 10, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100109 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qian, Y., Klaus, W., Vidmantas, U. & Grinshpun, S. A. Particle Reentrainment from Fibrous Filters. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 27, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965480 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hinds, W. C. in Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles Ch. Chapter 6, (Wiley, 2012).

  38. Qian, Y., Klaus, W. A. G. S. & Donnelly, J. Performance of N95 Respirators: Reaerosolization of Bacteria and Solid Particles. Am. Ind. Hygiene Association J. 58, 876–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119791012216 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher, E. M., Richardson, A. W., Harpest, S. D., Hofacre, K. C. & Shaffer, R. E. Reaerosolization of MS2 Bacteriophage from an N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator by Simulated Coughing. Annals Occupational Hygiene 56, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mer101 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Birkner, J. S., Fung, D., Hinds, W. C. & Kennedy, N. J. Particle Release from Respirators, Part I: Determination of the Effect of Particle Size, Drop Height, and Load. J Occupational Environ. Hygiene 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.534975 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Birkner, J. S., Kovalchik, S., Fung, D., Hinds, W. C. & Kennedy, N. J. Particle Release from Respirators, Part II: Determination of the Effect of Tension Applied in Simulation of Removal. J. Occupational Environ. Hygiene 8, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.535710 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Anthony, T. R., Grassian, V. H. & Peters, T. M. Accurate quantification of tio2 nanoparticles collected on air filters using a microwave-assisted acid digestion method. J. Occupational Environ. Hygiene 13, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1072278 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smallwood, G. J., Corbin, J.C., Gagné, S., Leroux, I., Lussier, S.A., Liu, F., Norooz Oliaee, J., Lobo, P. A research-grade N95 respirator particle filtration efficiency measurement procedure. (NRC, Metrology Research Centre, 2020).

  44. Corbin, J. C. et al. Systematic experimental comparison of particle filtration efficiency test methods for commercial respirators and face masks. Sci. Rep. 11, 21979. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01265-8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sipkens, T. A. et al. Comparison of measurement systems for assessing number- and mass-based particle filtration efficiency. J. Occupational Environ. Hygiene 19, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2022.2114596 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sipkens, T. A. et al. Interlaboratory comparison of particle filtration efficiency testing equipment. J. Occupational Environ. Hygiene 22, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2024.2447321 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Soo, J.-C., Monaghan, K., Lee, T., Kashon, M. & Harper, M. Air sampling filtration media: Collection efficiency for respirable size-selective sampling. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1128525 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Kai Cui and Mark Salomons from the NRC’s Quantum and Nanotechnologies Research Centre microscopy facility for all STEM imaging and EDX analysis. We would also like to thank Chase Sun for his help in implementing the inline agitation. This work was funded by the New Substances Assessment and Control Bureau, Health Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada

    R. Mehri, Z. Gajdosechova, T. A. Sipkens, G. J. Smallwood & J. C. Corbin

  2. New Substances Assessment and Control Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada

    A. M. Belknap & D. Vladisavljevic

Authors
  1. R. Mehri
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Z. Gajdosechova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Sipkens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. J. Smallwood
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. M. Belknap
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Vladisavljevic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. C. Corbin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.M, Z.G, T.S, G.S and A.B contributed to the conceptualization of the study. R.M and Z.G performed the investigation and data analysis. R.M wrote the original draft and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Mehri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehri, R., Gajdosechova, Z., Sipkens, T.A. et al. Quantification and characterization of manufactured nanomaterials shed from face masks. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34482-6

Download citation

  • Received: 28 June 2025

  • Accepted: 29 December 2025

  • Published: 03 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34482-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Particle shedding
  • Face mask
  • Manufactured nanomaterial
  • Titanium dioxide
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology