Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward insulin treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural modeling study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 January 2026

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward insulin treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural modeling study

  • Xiaoxiao Wang1,
  • Yahao Ling2,
  • Yucen Liu1,
  • Hao Ju1,
  • Xiao Li1,
  • Hezhi Wang3 &
  • …
  • Xiaosu Bai1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 709 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Endocrinology
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

This Web-based cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) regarding insulin treatment. It was conducted from March 2023 to July 2023. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect demographic information from patients with T2DM and assess their KAP regarding insulin treatment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied, and model adequacy was evaluated using established fit indices, including chi-square fit statistic/degrees of freedom, root mean square error of approximation, incremental fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and comparative fit index. A total of 679 questionnaires were collected. Among patients with T2DM, 434 (63.92%) were male, 568 (84.65%) resided in urban areas, 328 (48.31%) had a high school or technical secondary school education, and 302 (44.48%) reported a familial predisposition to diabetes. The KAP scores were 4.43 ± 2.49 (possible range: 0–8), 36.63 ± 6.30 (possible range: 10–50), and 28.90 ± 10.69 (possible range: 9–45), respectively. SEM demonstrated that knowledge was positively associated with attitudes (β = 0.844, P < 0.001), and attitudes significantly predicted practices (β = 0.903, P < 0.001). The study found that participants in this sample demonstrated limited knowledge (mean score of 4.43/8), moderately negative attitudes (mean score of 36.63/50), and generally passive practices (mean score of 28.90/45) regarding insulin treatment. This the necessity of comprehensive training programs to enhance patient understanding and foster effective insulin administration behaviors. These findings highlight the need for strengthened patient education strategies and clinical interventions to improve insulin-related knowledge, attitudes, and self-management behaviors in routine diabetes care.

Similar content being viewed by others

A metamodel-based flexible insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes patients subjected to aerobic physical activity

Article Open access 16 May 2022

Inconvenience, lifestyle flexibility, glycemic control, and satisfaction with insulin treatment among patients with diabetes mellitus in palestine: a cross-sectional study

Article Open access 21 August 2025

The clinical relevance of a polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Korean population

Article Open access 08 March 2024

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published manuscript.

References

  1. Galicia-Garcia, U. et al. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, (2020).

  2. Kotwas, A., Karakiewicz, B., Zabielska, P., Wieder-Huszla, S. & Jurczak, A. Epidemiological factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence from the global burden of disease. Arch. Public. Health. 79, 110 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanase, D. M. et al. The intricate relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), insulin resistance (IR), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 3920196 (2020).

  4. Khan, M. A. B., Hashim, M. J., King, J. K., Govender, R. D., Mustafa, H. & Al Kaabi, J. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes - global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J. Epidemiol. Glob Health. 10, 107–111 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ong, K. L. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet 402, 203–234 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, D. & Finck, B. N. Emerging therapeutic approaches for the treatment of NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 17, 484–495 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freckmann, G. et al. Insulin pump therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Evidence, current barriers, and new technologies. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 15, 901–915 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Contreras-Vergara, A. et al. Impact of pharmaceutical education on medication adherence and its clinical efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes and systemic arterial hypertension. Patient Prefer Adherence. 16, 1999–2007 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alidrisi, H. A., Bohan, A. & Mansour, A. A. Barriers of doctors and patients in starting insulin for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cureus 13, e18263 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, T. et al. The unmet medical needs of current injectable antidiabetic therapies in China: patient and health care professional perspectives. Clin. Ther. 42, 1549–1563 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, S. et al. Factors associated with psychological insulin resistance among patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 15, 1368132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rahmatullah, Qutubuddin, M., Rahman, A., Ghafoor, R., Riaz, M. & E.& Assessment of factors associated with non-compliance to self-management practices in people with type 2 diabetes. Cureus 13, e18918 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, S. et al. Effect of medication adherence on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: analysis of the SIMPLE study. BMJ Open. Diabetes Res. Care. 7, e000761 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, X. N. et al. Prevalence and contributing factors of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol. 60, 1155–1169 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tahani, B. & Manesh, S. S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of dentists toward providing care to the geriatric patients. BMC Geriatr. 21, 399 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, W. et al. Relationship between diabetic knowledge, attitudes and practices among patients with diabetes in China: a structural equation model. BMJ Open. 13, e076464 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pi, L., He, B., Fei, D., Shi, X. & Zhou, Z. Diabetes knowledge, attitudes and practices among Chinese primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Prim. Care. 25, 348 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chu, L. T., Nguyen, T. Q., Pham, P. T. T. & Thai, T. T. The effectiveness of health education in improving knowledge about hypoglycemia and insulin pen use among outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at a primary care hospital in Vietnam. J. Diabetes Res. 2021, 9921376 (2021).

  19. Franco, D. R., Perez-Nieves, M., Ivanova, J. I., Cao, D. & Vaz, M. S. C. Basal insulin persistence in Brazilian participants with T2DM. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 65, 1254–1264 (2019).

  20. Al-Harrasi, A., Pinto, A. D., Jayapal, S. K., Morsi, M. & Al-Mawali, A. Structural equation modeling to identify the direct and indirect risk factors of diabetes in adults: findings from a national survey. Am. J. Med. Sci. 364, 274–280 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chan, S. P. et al. Practical guidance on basal insulin initiation and titration in Asia: A Delphi-based consensus. Diabetes Ther. 13, 1511–1529 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nasir, B. B., Buseir, M. S. & Muhammed, O. S. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards insulin self-administration and associated factors among diabetic patients at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 16, e0246741 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ngo, T. K. C., Vo, T. H. & Le, C. Knowledge, attitude, and practice concerning hypoglycaemia, insulin use, and insulin pens in Vietnamese diabetic outpatients: prevalence and impact on safety and disease control. J. Eval Clin. Pract. 27, 404–413 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Obagha, E. C., Ajayi, I., Abdullahi, G. A. & Umeokonkwo, C. D. Clients’ satisfaction with preventive services for malaria during pregnancy in Anambra state, Nigeria. BMC Public. Health. 20, 1660 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yosef, T. Knowledge and attitude on insulin self-administration among type 1 diabetic patients at Metu Karl Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 7801367 (2019).

  26. Priscilla, S., Malarvizhi, S., Das, A. K. & Natarajan, V. The level of knowledge and attitude on insulin therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus in a teaching hospital of Southern India. J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 8, 3287–3291 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alexandre, K. et al. Factors influencing diabetes self-management in adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 19, 1003–1118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, X. et al. Direct medical costs for patients with type 2 diabetes in 16 tertiary hospitals in urban China: A multicenter prospective cohort study. J. Diabetes Investig. 10, 539–551 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, X., Zhang, L. & Chen, W. Trends in economic burden of type 2 diabetes in China: based on longitudinal claim data. Front. Public. Health. 11, 1062903 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Janssen, L. M. M. et al. Burden of disease of type 2 diabetes mellitus: cost of illness and quality of life estimated using the Maastricht Study. Diabet. Med. 37, 1759–1765 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. O’Connell, J. M. & Manson, S. M. Understanding the economic costs of diabetes and prediabetes and what we may learn about reducing the health and economic burden of these conditions. Diabetes Care. 42, 1609–1611 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reddy, P. A., Saravanan, K. & Madhukar, A. To assess and compare the knowledge, attitude and practice of patients with diabetes in control and intervention groups. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 46, 586–591 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gautam, S. K. & Gupta, V. Impact of knowledge, attitude and practice on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in developing countries: A review. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 18, e010521189965 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Veluvali, A. et al. Impact of digital health interventions on glycemic control and weight management. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 20 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stoumpos, A. I., Kitsios, F. & Talias, M. A. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 20, (2023).

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects of Medical and Health Institutions of Longhua District, Shenzhen (Grant No. 2023002), the Hospital Pharmacy Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2023A32), and the Scientific Research Projects of Medical and Health Institutions of Longhua District, Shenzhen (Grant No. 2022106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, China

    Xiaoxiao Wang, Yucen Liu, Hao Ju, Xiao Li & Xiaosu Bai

  2. Department of Pharmacy, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, China

    Yahao Ling

  3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China

    Hezhi Wang

Authors
  1. Xiaoxiao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yahao Ling
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yucen Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hao Ju
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hezhi Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaosu Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WXX, BXS, and WHZ carried out the experiments, participated in collecting data, and drafted the manuscript. LYH and JH performed statistical analysis and participated in study design. LX and LYC participated in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and prepared the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hezhi Wang or Xiaosu Bai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards set out in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Affiliated Longhua People’s Hospital (Approval No. Longyi-2023-038). Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Ling, Y., Liu, Y. et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward insulin treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural modeling study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34821-7

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2025

  • Accepted: 31 December 2025

  • Published: 14 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34821-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Knowledge
  • Practices
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing