Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Biodegradation of insecticide residue by lactic acid bacteria
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 January 2026

Biodegradation of insecticide residue by lactic acid bacteria

  • K. Kiruthika1,
  • A. Suganthi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-44591,
  • R. Anandham2,
  • Y. S. Johnson Thangaraj Edward1,
  • P. Renukadevi3,
  • M. Murugan1,
  • Bimal Kumar Sahoo1,
  • Mohammad Ikram1,
  • J. Kousika1 &
  • …
  • M. Alagar1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 693 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Biotechnology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Microbiology

Abstract

The persistence of insecticide residues on food crops poses a significant risk to human health and the environment, necessitating effective residue mitigation strategies. This study evaluates the potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, for degrading residues of cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole under laboratory conditions, and further assessed their degradation potential for cyantraniliprole under field conditions. Residue levels were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, allowing precise measurement of degradation rates. In minimal broth, both strains reduced cyantraniliprole residues up to 33.07% and chlorantraniliprole residues by up to 23.44% over 12 days, with Lactobacillus pentosus demonstrating a higher degradation efficiency. Nutrient broth significantly enhanced biodegradation efficiency, with both LAB strains removing more than 98% of cyantraniliprole within 4 days and achieving complete degradation by 10th day. Controlled field evaluation demonstrated the practical efficacy of LAB application, where Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactococcus lactis reduced insecticide residues by up to 40.99 and 34.52% respectively, after 8 h of spraying. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of LAB as a natural, eco-friendly solution for mitigating pesticide residues in food commodities, contributing to sustainable agricultural practices.

Similar content being viewed by others

A microbiota-derived metabolite, 3-phenyllactic acid, prolongs healthspan by enhancing mitochondrial function and stress resilience via SKN-1/ATFS-1 in C. elegans

Article Open access 30 December 2024

Probiotic potentials of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Egyptian fermented food

Article Open access 03 October 2023

Evaluation of semi prepared probiotic dessert containing phycoerythrin and Lactobacillus plantarum for period of up to two months within the refrigerator

Article Open access 20 July 2025

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files (Tables S1 and S2).

References

  1. Ahmad, M. F. et al. Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their mechanisms of action and possible countermeasures. Heliyon 10(7), e29128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sivasankari, S. et al. Study on impact of decontamination and processing methods on insecticide residues in green and red chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) using LC-MS/MS. Food Control 169, 110999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110999 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan, S. et al. Screening of lactic acid bacteria for degrading organophosphorus pesticides and their potential protective effects against pesticide toxicity. LWT 147, 111672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111672 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan, S. et al. Recent advance in probiotics for the elimination of pesticide residues in food and feed: mechanisms, product toxicity, and reinforcement strategies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2246545 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiruthika, K. et al. Role of lactic acid bacteria in insecticide residue degradation. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10298-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson, E. B., Troczka, B. J., Gutbrod, O., Davies, T. E. & Nauen, R. Diamide resistance: 10 years of lessons from lepidopteran pests. J. Pest. Sci. 93, 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01220-y (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awad, M. et al. Lethal and sublethal effects of cyantraniliprole on the biology and metabolic enzyme activities of Spodoptera littoralis and Agrotis ipsilon, and a generalist predator. Chrysoperla carnea. Insects 15, 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060450 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jerez, P. G. P. et al. Diamide seed treatment may protect early soybean growth stages against Helicoverpa armigera. Crop Prot. 168, 106214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106214 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosch, D., Rodríguez, M. A., Depalo, L. & Avilla, J. Determination of the baseline susceptibility of European populations of Cydia pomonella to chlorantraniliprole. J. Econ. Entomol. 111, 844–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy020 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anjum, F. & Wright, D. Relative toxicity of insecticides to the crucifer pests Plutella xylostella and Myzus persicae and their natural enemies. Crop Prot. 88, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.06.002 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Žunić, A., Vuković, S., Lazić, S., Šunjka, D. & Bošković, D. The efficacy of novel diamide insecticides in Grapholita molesta suppression and their residues in peach fruits. Plant Prot. Sci. https://doi.org/10.17221/71/2019-PPS (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tiwari, S. & Stelinski, L. L. Effects of cyantraniliprole against Asian citrus psyllid under laboratory and field conditions. Pest Manag. Sci. 69, 1066–1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3468 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, C. P. et al. Simultaneous determination of five kinds of diamide insecticides in fruits and vegetables by Sin-QueChERS with UPLC-MS/MS. Food Chem. 11(6), 1784–1791 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz-Garcia, L. et al. Top-down enrichment strategy to co-cultivate lactic acid and lignocellulolytic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 12, 744075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.744075 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamoud, N. H. & Sifour, M. Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos by Weissella confusa. Arch. Microbiol. 203, 3615–3621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02353-z (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J. H. et al. Biodegradation of organophosphorus insecticides by Lactobacillus plantarum WCP931. Appl. Biol. Chem. 64, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00632-3 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anastassiades, M. et al. QuEChERS multiresidue method for pesticides. J. AOAC Int. 86, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. CIBRC. Major Uses of Pesticides (Registered under the Insecticides Act, 1968)… up to 31.03.2025. Government of India (2024).

  19. FSSAI. Guidance Document & SOPs for Fixation of Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) of Pesticides in Food Products. Government of India (2022).

  20. SANTE. Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residue Analysis in Food and Feed. SANTE/11312/2021 (2021).

  21. Liu, F. et al. Characterization of Lactobacillus pentosus 3–27 for β-cypermethrin degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 423, 127101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127101 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, Y. S. et al. Microbial adaptation to enhance stress tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 13, 888746 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumral, A., Kumral, N. A. & Gurbuz, O. Degradation of chlorpyrifos and deltamethrin by Lactobacillus plantarum. Turk. J. Entomol. 44, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.625156 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Misra, A., Vinod, R. & Bhattacharyya, A. Degradation of fenvalerate in milk by lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Res. 49(9), 635–639 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, X. H. & Wang, J. Degradation kinetics of organophosphorus pesticides in milk cultured with Lactobacillus spp. Food Chem. 131, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.046 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y. H. et al. Enhanced degradation of five organophosphorus pesticides in milk by lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem. 164, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.059 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, X. W. & Zhao, X. H. Susceptibility of nine OP pesticides in milk toward lactic acid bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6710 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pinto, G. et al. Lactic acid bacteria for organophosphate degradation in food. LWT 110, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.02.037 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, M. et al. Cypermethrin-binding capacity of lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem. 347, 129000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129000 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, W. J. et al. Bioremediation of β-cypermethrin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Res. 236, 116619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116619 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Park, H. et al. Carbofuran-degrading Chryseobacterium sp. BSC2–3. Metabolites 12(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12030219 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Omeiri, M. et al. Chlorpyrifos biodegradation by soil bacteria. Bioremediat. J. 28, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2022.2130874 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Anita, V. & Chauhan, S. A. R. Indoxacarb dissipation in Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6, 814–819 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Radwan, M., Abu-Elamayem, M., Shiboob, M. & Abdel-Aal, A. Residual behaviour of profenofos on some field-grown vegetables and its removal using various washing solutions and household processing. Food Chem. Toxicol. 43, 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.12.009 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Elkins, E. R. Effect of commercial processing on pesticide residues. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 72, 533–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/72.3.533 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Đorđević, T. et al. Dissipation of pirimiphos-methyl in wheat fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 57(5), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12128 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Đorđević, T. M. et al. Stability of bifenthrin in milled wheat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93(13), 3377–3383. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6188 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, Y. H. et al. Biodegradation of OP pesticides in corn silage by Lactobacillus plantarum. 3 Biotech 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0364-3 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Researchers are grateful to Pesticide Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Entomology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, and All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues and Contaminants, for the facilities provided during this study.

Funding

No funding was received for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

    K. Kiruthika, A. Suganthi, Y. S. Johnson Thangaraj Edward, M. Murugan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Mohammad Ikram, J. Kousika & M. Alagar

  2. Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

    R. Anandham

  3. Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

    P. Renukadevi

Authors
  1. K. Kiruthika
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Suganthi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Anandham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y. S. Johnson Thangaraj Edward
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Renukadevi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Murugan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bimal Kumar Sahoo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mohammad Ikram
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Kousika
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Alagar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.K.—Wrote the main manuscript, conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, software, methodology, validation; revision; A.S. Reviewed and edited the manuscript, supervision, conceptualization, methodology, revision; R.A, Y.S.J.T.E, P.R, M.M, M.A—Investigation and validation; B.K.S, M.I, J.K- Software and formal analysis—All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suganthi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiruthika, K., Suganthi, A., Anandham, R. et al. Biodegradation of insecticide residue by lactic acid bacteria. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34844-0

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2025

  • Accepted: 31 December 2025

  • Published: 06 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34844-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lactococcus lactis
  • Lactobacillus pentosus
  • Diamide
  • Degradation
  • Residue
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research