Table 3 Comparative study of the efficiency of Fe3O4@RF/Pr-NH2 with the former catalysts in the Knoevenagel condensation.
Entry | Catalyst | Conditions | Time | Recovery times | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fe3O4-PPCA nanoparticles | Cat. (0.5 g), CH2Cl2, 25 °C | 2 h | 4 | |
2 | HAP-g-Fe2O3 | Cat. (25 mg), water, 50 °C | 3 h | 5 | |
3 | FeNPs/PPD@rGO | Cat. (0.05 g), toluene, 40 °C | 3.5 h | 6 | |
4 | Mg@PS-anthra | Cat. (0.05 g), solvent-free, RT | 2 h | 5 | |
5 | Zn-MOF | Cat. (0.0693 g), toluene, 50 °C | 48 h | 4 | |
6 | Fe3O4@RF/Pr-NH2 | Cat. (0.01 g), EtOH, 60 °C | 30 min | 10 | This work |