Introduction

With the aging of populations worldwide, older workers are increasingly being seen as an essential part of the labor workforce in Japan. For instance, while the number of people aged ≥ 65 years in Japan is approximately 36 million (28.8% of the population)1, the number of older workers aged ≥ 65 years has reached over 9 million (13.6% of the total workforce)2, and the employment rate of older workers was 25.2% in 20233.

The incidence of occupational accidents, especially occupational fatalities and injuries, in this older working population has received attention, and effective prevention strategies are urgently needed. In Japan, 28.7% of the occupational accidents requiring a job leave of four days or more in 2022 occurred among older workers4. In particular, falls are the most common type of occupational accident in Japan, accounting for 28.8% of the total occupational accidents, and the incidence of occupational falls has been increasing4. In Japan, the number of fall-related occupational accidents requiring an absence of ≥ 4 days significantly increases from 40 years of age. The annual fall-related injury rate per 1,000 workers is lowest in the 25–29-years age group but rises progressively with age starting at 30 years5. Therefore, the risk of falls in middle and older ages can be alleviated by implementing measures aimed at maintaining physical function from a relatively young age.

For fall prevention in the workplace, occupational health strategies have mainly focused on improving environmental factors, including social management factors (e.g., organization and tidiness, haste and rule violations, and workplace culture) and external factors (e.g., floor friction, uneven surfaces, steps, handrails, lighting, and passage width). However, individual factors, including internal factors (e.g., motor and visual disabilities, physical and mental illnesses, and medication status) and injury-amplifying factors (e.g., physical strength and resilience, agility, bone strength, and internal organ resilience), have received less attention (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Static balance function is known to be an individual-level internal fall risk factor. Clinical and community-based studies have extensively used the one-leg standing test with eyes closed to evaluate static balance function6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Using this highly accurate and reproducible screening tool for fall risk, cross-sectional studies have reported shortening of one-leg standing time across different age categories, suggesting that static balance function declines with aging14,15. Among modifiable behavioral factors, walking has been suggested to improve static balance function16. However, longitudinal studies evaluating the temporal changes in this function are scarce. Moreover, the extent to which daily exercise habits, such as walking, improve this function has not been clarified.

We aimed to assess whether one-leg standing time with eyes closed, an indicator of static balance and occupational fall risk, declined with age in a working cohort in Japan. Additionally, we aimed to elucidate how daily walking habits may mitigate the age-related decline in one-leg standing time.

Results

The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age and one-leg standing time with eyes closed were 38.6 (10.4) years and 25.2 (8.6) s, respectively. Among all participants, 65.5% reported having a daily walking habit, 52.6% smoked, and 21.3% consumed alcohol 4 or more days per week. Older workers had a shorter one-leg standing time (Supplementary Table S1), and the one-leg standing time decreased almost linearly with age in the cross-sectional association at baseline (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the 249 study participants.
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distributions of the baseline one-leg standing time with eyes closed across 249 air and spacecraft manufacturing workers of different ages. (a) Scatter plots with a fitted quadratic spline curve illustrating individual data points and a linear declining trend across ages. The number of participants achieving 30 s of one-leg standing test was 51 (20–29 years), 47 (30–39 years), 59 (40–49 years), 12 (50–59 years), and 1 (60–66 years). (b) Bar charts representing the mean one-leg standing times for each 10-year age category, highlighting a declining trend in static physical balance by age (P for trend < 0.001). The mean (standard deviation) of one-leg standing time with eyes closed was 28.5 (4.5) s, 26.9 (7.2) s, 24.1 (9.1) s, 19.4 (10.9) s, and 16.8 (14.2) s at 20–29 years (n = 62), 30–39 years (n = 61), 40–49 years (n = 92), 50–59 years (n = 30), and 60–66 years (n = 4), respectively. The error bars in the graph represent the 95% confidence intervals.

In the longitudinal analysis employing two-level multilevel linear regression with all 575 data points (Table 2), a significant age-related decline in one-leg standing time was observed. After adjusting for sex, the age-related decline was β = – 0.29 (Model 1). Even after adjusting for modifiable behavioral factors in Model 2, this age-related decline remained statistically significant (β = – 0.22), indicating that each additional year of age was associated with a 0.22-s decrease in the one-leg standing time.

Table 2 Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for one-leg standing time with eyes closed estimated using multilevel linear regression.

In contrast, a daily walking habit was associated with an increase in one-leg standing time (β = 1.76 in Model 2, Table 2), suggesting that a daily walking habit may improve the one-leg standing time by 1.76 s. Sensitivity analyses showed a similar pattern as the main result (Table 3), and alcohol consumption and hearing loss also predicted a decline in one-leg standing time (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 3 Sensitivity analyses for age-related decline in one-leg standing time with eyes closed and beneficial impact of daily walking habits.

Discussion

Using a longitudinal analysis design in a Japanese working cohort, we confirmed that the one-leg standing time with eyes closed, a physical indicator of static balance, declined linearly with age, decreasing by approximately 0.2 s per year starting in the early stages of working life. This suggests that the increase in occupational fall risk in the working lives of individuals may begin as early as in the 30s. We also found that daily walking habits may have beneficial effects on maintaining and/or improving static balance. Interestingly, the extent to which daily walking habits positively influenced one-leg standing time (approximately + 2 s) was approximately 10 times greater than the negative impact of aging (approximately − 0.2 s). While a decline in physical function at the workplace is a natural consequence of aging, our study revealed for the first time that adopting a habit of “walking” might improve the body’s static balance function.

Our results are consistent with previous findings showing that one-leg standing time and postural stability decline with age14,17. Three major sensory systems—visual, vestibular, and somatosensory—are crucial for maintaining balance, and reductions in one-leg standing time are influenced by age-related sensory declines18. A study of healthy men aged 30–80 years reported decreased postural stability and sensory function in their 60s19. The mean velocity of sway in a one-leg standing position with eyes closed was significantly lower in individuals in their 40s to 50s compared to those in their 30s19. Therefore, the one-leg standing balance test with eyes closed is useful to understand and monitor changes in physical function due to aging in working-age populations.

Our finding that daily walking habits may improve balance function is particularly important for workers engaged in high-place tasks, where falls from heights can lead to serious workplace injuries such as neurotrauma and fatalities. Although high levels of physical activity have been reported to help maintain postural stability20, a recent randomized controlled trial found that brisk walking improved one-leg standing balance in older women, consistent with our results16. Additionally, one-leg standing time has been associated with bone fractures21,22. Therefore, evaluating one-leg standing balance could serve as a screening tool for those with high risk of serious occupational injuries.

This study had several limitations that require consideration. First, the sample size was small, and the results from a single industry may have limited generalizability. Additionally, data on fall history or work-related injuries were not available, and the maximum one-leg standing time measurement was capped at 30 s, which may have introduced a ceiling effect. Future studies are needed to validate these associations using alternative assessment measures. Furthermore, healthy workers engaged in tasks at heights are likely to have good postural stability23, potentially underestimating the impact of age-related declines in static balance. However, one-leg standing is likely a robust indicator of fall risk10,24. Second, specific types of physical exercise and sports and intensity were not included25. Therefore, further research is needed to identify specific types of exercise and sports activities that may impact static balance function. Nevertheless, daily walking habits were shown to be beneficial for maintaining static balance. Additionally, other behavioral factors, including alcohol consumption and hearing loss, were found to be risk factors for declining static balance. Third, the impact of work experience on postural stability was not assessed26. Nevertheless, our results suggest that static balance tends to decline gradually in the early stages of an individual’s working life.

Despite these limitations, using a longitudinal design in a working cohort in Japan, this study is the first to simultaneously elucidate the specific deteriorating impact of aging and the preventive effects of daily walking habits on static balance in an aging workforce for whom fall prevention is a priority. Additionally, similar studies covering the aircraft manufacturing industry are scarce, and the data in the present study were obtained during annual health checkups to ensure validity.

In conclusion, the static balance of workers tends to begin declining linearly in the early stages of working life, while daily walking habits may offer a promising approach to mitigate the occupational fall risk in aging workplaces in Japan. Although national occupational health strategies have primarily focused on improving environmental factors, emphasizing individual factors, such as balance function, is also crucial. Thus, future studies should highlight nature-based strategies27,28,29,30 and encourage physical exercise in younger working populations to prevent fall-related occupational accidents.

Methods

Study design and study participants

This longitudinal study was conducted using data obtained from annual health checkups at the Kanagawa Health Service Association, Kanagawa, Japan. The participants were 249 workers (seven women, 2.8%) aged 20–66 years (mean age, 38.6 years; SD, 10.4 years), engaged in the manufacturing of aircraft, spacecraft, and related machinery at a single company. The participants underwent annual health checkups and additional measurements with the one-leg standing test with eyes closed. Between June 2017 and July 2019, 249 participants underwent a one-leg standing test at least once over 3 years. Although we intended to exclude participants with missing data for age, sex, or exercise habits, none of the participants met any of these criteria. All participants underwent health checkups performed by a physician and provided written informed consent.

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (No. R4-054).

Main outcome: one-leg standing time with eyes closed

The one-leg standing test with eyes closed was performed annually between 2017 and 2019. Of the 249 participants, 66 completed the test once, 40 completed it twice, and 143 completed it three times over the three-year period, yielding a total of 575 data points (218 in 2017, 183 in 2018, and 174 in 2019). Further details are provided in Supplementary Table S3.

The participants underwent the one-leg standing test with their eyes closed using a self-selected lower limb under the monitoring of a nurse. During the measurements, participants were instructed to keep their arms free, avoid touching the other leg, and keep their eyes closed17. The procedure was repeated twice, and the best (longer) of the two trials was recorded. The goal was to maintain balance for 30 s17. If the participants remained standing for 30 s, a time of 30 s was recorded. The investigator used a digital stopwatch and stopped the time measurement when either the raised foot touched the floor or when a maximum of 30 s had elapsed.

Participants’ age, daily walking habits, and other characteristics

In addition to recording the participants’ age at the time of the health check-up, we assessed daily walking habits using the following question: “Do you engage in walking or physical activity equivalent to walking for at least 1 hour per day?” (yes/no).

Other characteristics included body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption (none, former, sometimes [≤ 3 days per week], often [4 or 5 days per week], or daily [almost every day]), and smoking status (never, former, or current). The data were collected during health checkups (see full characteristics, including hearing loss, defined as abnormal findings in daily conversation at 1–4 kHz, in Supplementary Table S1).

Statistical analysis

First, among the initial 249 measurement data points in the cross-sectional design, we identified an age-related linear declining trend in one-leg standing time with eyes closed using a quadratic spline curve. Additionally, differences in the mean one-leg standing time across 10-year age groups were described.

Next, using all 575 data points in a longitudinal design, we defined the causal pathway (Supplementary Fig. 2) as follows: age as the exposure, one-leg standing time with eyes closed as the outcome, and sex as a confounding factor in our regression analyses (Model 1). Model 2 included modifiable behavioral variables as mediating factors, including daily walking habits, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and BMI. To estimate the coefficient (β) and 95% confidence interval for one-leg standing time with eyes closed, we used a two-level multilevel linear regression model. All one-leg standing time data with eyes closed (Level 1) were nested within 249 individuals (Level 2), and a random intercept was employed for individuals.

For sensitivity analyses, we performed the same regression analysis among 143 participants who completed the one-leg standing test three times over three years. Additionally, we conducted a restricted analysis of male workers. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the initial 249 data points. Finally, we performed a linear regression analysis that included all potential covariates. Alpha was set at 0.05, and all p-values were two-sided. Data were analyzed using the STATA/MP17 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).