Table 2 Comparison of the results of different feature selection algorithms on the Framingham dataset.
Algorithm | Population size | Average run time | Cohen Kappa value | Number of features | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg | Max | Min | Std | ||||
WOA | 10 | 27.0Â s | 0.62884 | 0.64141 | 0.61692 | 0.00870 | 10 |
25 | 59.8Â s | 0.63430 | 0.64177 | 0.62548 | 0.00496 | 11 | |
50 | 122.2Â s | 0.63824 | 0.64301 | 0.63356 | 0.00297 | 10 | |
CSA | 10 | 89.0Â s | 0.59783 | 0.78417 | 0.50000 | 0.08501 | 11 |
25 | 208.3Â s | 0.57390 | 0.76668 | 0.49476 | 0.07906 | 13 | |
50 | 389.7Â s | 0.57142 | 0.68143 | 0.50000 | 0.05389 | 10 | |
FPA | 10 | 581.4Â s | 0.62097 | 0.78954 | 0.49870 | 0.07814 | 9 |
25 | 1437.5Â s | 0.62898 | 0.77934 | 0.52452 | 0.06370 | 10 | |
50 | 1739.2Â s | 0.58342 | 0.69343 | 0.51200 | 0.04536 | 10 | |
HHO | 10 | 458.7Â s | 0.61950 | 0.72280 | 0.48208 | 0.06018 | 12 |
25 | 1063.9Â s | 0.62097 | 0.68280 | 0.58782 | 0.02375 | 11 | |
50 | 2191.2Â s | 0.60763 | 0.68280 | 0.56929 | 0.02838 | 12 | |
PSO | 10 | 1621.5Â s | 0.46231 | 0.61200 | 0.38576 | 0.05656 | 12 |
25 | 1824.9Â s | 0.46474 | 0.59000 | 0.38726 | 0.05069 | 11 | |
50 | 2022.3Â s | 0.52717 | 0.63167 | 0.30000 | 0.08292 | 12 | |
GA | 10 | 97.1Â s | 0.43531 | 0.60000 | 0.28576 | 0.09252 | 10 |
25 | 628Â s | 0.44474 | 0.60000 | 0.39736 | 0.07841 | 12 | |
50 | 1448.9Â s | 0.53617 | 0.63153 | 0.29999 | 0.09145 | 11 | |