Table 3 The comparison of F1-score between MSCNV and GROM-RD.
From: A copy number variation detection method based on OCSVM algorithm using multi strategies integration
Configurations | N | Methods | M(QR) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SC = 20X, TP = 0.2 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.714(0.086) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.283(0.061) | ||
SC = 20X, TP = 0.4 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.905(0.081) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.5(0.078) | ||
SC = 20X, TP = 0.6 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0.026) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.483(0.079) | ||
SC = 20X, TP = 0.8 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.816(0.067) | ||
SC = 30X, TP = 0.2 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.795(0.085) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.344(0.07) | ||
SC = 30X, TP = 0.4 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.929(0.076) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.484(0.076) | ||
SC = 30X, TP = 0.6 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.4(0.101) | ||
SC = 30X, TP = 0.8 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.87(0.058) | ||
SC = 40X, TP = 0.2 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.842(0.106) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.318(0.07) | ||
SC = 40X, TP = 0.4 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0.026) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.458(0.055) | ||
SC = 40X, TP = 0.6 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0.022) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.38(0.077) | ||
SC = 40X, TP = 0.8 | 30 | MSCNV | 0.952(0) | 0.000 |
30 | GROM-RD | 0.889(0.056) |
