Table 1 Comparative analysis of the proposed method and three existing methods.
Method | Advantages | Applicable scenarios |
|---|---|---|
Dimensionality reduction based on VAE30 | Unsupervised learning, high adaptability, no need for large amounts of labeled data | Suitable for unsupervised learning tasks, particularly when labeled data is limited, enabling effective feature extraction through dimensionality reduction. |
Q-Transform and HOG feature extraction31 | Strong feature engineering, model diversity, high interpretability | Ideal for applications requiring high-quality feature extraction and model selection, especially when model decision processes need to be explained. |
Data generated from 3D simulation32 | Enhanced synthetic data, benefits of deep learning | Appropriate for fault diagnosis tasks with limited labeled data, particularly when obtaining real-world data is challenging, by generating synthetic data through simulations. |
Proposed | Capable of handling open-set problems, cross-domain fault diagnosis | Suitable for scenarios involving open-set problems, requiring cross-domain learning and fault detection, especially in complex environments. |