Table 16 Ranking proposed and different existing methods.

From: Framework development of continuous non-linear Diophantine fuzzy sets and its application to renewable energy source selection

Methods

Ranking

Extended Topsis47

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

CODAS method49

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

GRA method48

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

WASPAS method52

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

WS method50

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

WP method51

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)

Our proposed

\({\widetilde{A}}_{4}>{\widetilde{A}}_{3}>{\widetilde{A}}_{1}>{\widetilde{A}}_{5}>{\widetilde{A}}_{2}\)