Table 4 Classification, methods and AUC of previous relevant studies and this study.
Sequence | Study | Classification criteria and sample size | Methods | AUC | SEN | SPE | ACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Zhang, X. et al.[14] | VAE-NT eyes(59) vs. Normal eyes(142) | Combined tomographic and biomechanical parameters | 0.849 | 0.754 | 0.871 | / |
2 | Song, P. et al.[15] | SKC eyes(31) vs. Normal eyes(35) | Classifcation And Regression Tree (CART) | 0.95 | 0.903 | 0.943 | 0.924 |
3 | Smadja, D.et al[17] | FFKC eyes(47) vs. Normal eye(95) | Automated Decision Tree | / | 0.936 | 0.972 | / |
4 | Ambrósio, R. et al.[41] | VAE-NT eyes(551) vs. normal eyes(1680) | TBI_v.2 | 0.945 | 0.844 | 0.901 | / |
5 | Lopes, B. T. et al.[42] | VAE-NT eyes(188) vs. stable(298) | Pentacam Random Forest Index(PRFI) | 0.968 | 0.966 | 0.852 | / |
6 | Our study | SuspectedKC(116) vs. Subclincia KC(28) | Combined tomographic and biomechanical parameters | 0.964 | 0.963 | 0.888 | 0.902 |
