Table 5 Performance of the hybrid MVMD based L-SKRidge, dRVFL, LASSO, KRidge, and CFNN models based on assessment metrics in Brooke River.
Methods | Mode | R | RMSE | MAPE | NSE | IA | MaxAE | U95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WL (t + 1) | L-SKRidge | Train | 0.971 | 0.054 | 7.371 | 0.940 | 0.984 | 0.484 | 0.148 |
Test | 0.970 | 0.051 | 6.309 | 0.937 | 0.982 | 0.411 | 0.142 | ||
dRVFL | Train | 0.951 | 0.068 | 8.532 | 0.905 | 0.975 | 0.938 | 0.188 | |
Test | 0.963 | 0.066 | 7.860 | 0.896 | 0.968 | 0.469 | 0.176 | ||
LASSO | Train | 0.948 | 0.070 | 8.553 | 0.899 | 0.973 | 0.961 | 0.194 | |
Test | 0.960 | 0.066 | 8.022 | 0.895 | 0.968 | 0.465 | 0.178 | ||
KRidge | Train | 0.951 | 0.072 | 10.631 | 0.893 | 0.971 | 0.925 | 0.194 | |
Test | 0.963 | 0.061 | 8.362 | 0.909 | 0.972 | 0.435 | 0.170 | ||
CFNN | Train | 0.964 | 0.059 | 8.123 | 0.928 | 0.981 | 0.856 | 0.163 | |
Test | 0.955 | 0.062 | 8.527 | 0.907 | 0.973 | 0.380 | 0.172 | ||
WL (t + 3) | L-SKRidge | Train | 0.967 | 0.056 | 7.019 | 0.935 | 0.983 | 0.355 | 0.156 |
Test | 0.928 | 0.079 | 8.664 | 0.849 | 0.957 | 0.535 | 0.215 | ||
dRVFL | Train | 0.916 | 0.089 | 11.357 | 0.838 | 0.954 | 1.109 | 0.245 | |
Test | 0.912 | 0.088 | 10.735 | 0.813 | 0.942 | 0.692 | 0.240 | ||
LASSO | Train | 0.912 | 0.090 | 11.648 | 0.831 | 0.952 | 1.128 | 0.251 | |
Test | 0.915 | 0.086 | 10.445 | 0.820 | 0.944 | 0.706 | 0.236 | ||
KRidge | Train | 0.914 | 0.093 | 13.404 | 0.823 | 0.950 | 1.094 | 0.253 | |
Test | 0.916 | 0.084 | 10.943 | 0.831 | 0.948 | 0.675 | 0.232 | ||
CFNN | Train | 0.932 | 0.081 | 10.000 | 0.864 | 0.964 | 1.068 | 0.224 | |
Test | 0.882 | 0.096 | 11.026 | 0.776 | 0.935 | 0.636 | 0.266 |