Table 1 Comparison of basic data between the two groups.
From: Application of a 3D printed wig protection device after decompressive craniectomy
Group | Control group(n = 9) | Experimental group(n = 8) | Statistical value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Age[years, (¯χ±s)] | 53.22 ± 8.18 | 53.13 ± 8.92 | 0.100 | 0.756 |
Gender[case(percent,%)] | — | 0.576 | ||
Male | 6(66.70) | 7(87.50) | ||
Female | 3(33.30) | 1(12.50) | ||
Cause of skull defect[case(percent,%)] | — | 1.000 | ||
Acute Ischemic Stroke(AIS) | 1(11.10) | 1(12.25) | ||
Intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH) | 2(22.20) | 1(12.25) | ||
Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI) | 3(33.30) | 4(50.00) | ||
Subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) | 3(33.30) | 2(25.00) | ||
The site of the skull defect[case(percent,%)] | — | 0.637 | ||
Left | 3(33.30) | 4(50.00) | ||
Right | 6(66.70) | 4(50.00) |
