Table 2 Comparison of secondary injury, aesthetics and quality of life scores between the two groups.
From: Application of a 3D printed wig protection device after decompressive craniectomy
Group | Control group(n = 9) | Experimental group(n = 8) | Statistical value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Whether there is a secondary injury[case(percent,%)] | — | 0.206 | ||
Yes | 3(33.30) | 0(0.00) | ||
No | 6(66.70) | 8(100.00) | ||
Subjective evaluation of beauty before wearing[score, (χ±s)] | 1.89 ± 0.78 | 2.00 ± 0.53 | 2.310 | 0.149 |
Subjective evaluation of beauty after wearing[score, (χ±s)] | 2.33 ± 1.22 | 7.88 ± 0.64 | 6.231 | 0.025 |
QLQ-C30-7 days after surgery[score, (χ±s)] | 76.11 ± 3.41 | 76.75 ± 3.49 | 0.068 | 0.798 |
QLQ-C30-3 months after surgery [score, (χ±s)] | 92.00 ± 1.50 | 108.63 ± 3.16 | 5.023 | 0.041 |
QLQ-C30-6 months after surgery [score, (χ±s)]# | 98.33 ± 2.60 | 109.33 ± 1.53 | -6.812 | < 0.001 |
