Table 2 Different model evaluation results comparison for different reservoir parameters (Well A1).
From: Research on prediction method of well logging reservoir parameters based on Multi-TransFKAN model
Target parameter | Methods | RMSE | MSE | R2 | Adjusted R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHIF | Our proposed | 0.054 | 0.003 | 0.971 | 0.925 |
Transformer | 0.13 | 0.016 | 0.945 | 0.835 | |
TCN | 0.262 | 0.068 | 0.888 | 0.736 | |
LSTM | 0.323 | 0.104 | 0.836 | 0.670 | |
GRU | 0.421 | 0.177 | 0.811 | 0.631 | |
VSH | Our Proposed | 0.048 | 0.002 | 0.982 | 0.946 |
Transformer | 0.122 | 0.014 | 0.95 | 0.85 | |
TCN | 0.255 | 0.065 | 0.892 | 0.739 | |
LSTM | 0.311 | 0.096 | 0.846 | 0.663 | |
GRU | 0.412 | 0.169 | 0.819 | 0.612 | |
SW | Our Proposed | 0.063 | 0.004 | 0.97 | 0.91 |
Transformer | 0.129 | 0.016 | 0.943 | 0.829 | |
TCN | 0.263 | 0.069 | 0.884 | 0.74 | |
LSTM | 0.319 | 0.102 | 0.834 | 0.671 | |
GRU | 0.43 | 0.185 | 0.808 | 0.62 |