Table 2 Accuracy of VWI and 3D TOF-MRA in assessing VBA geometric configurations (n = 192 patients).
VBA geometric configurations | VWI (n) | 3D TOF-MRA (n) | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | W | L | T | W | L | |||
VWI + 3D TOF-MRA | Tuning fork (T) | 71 | 2 | 1 | 67 | 0 | 6 | 73 |
Walking (W) | 2 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 5 | 45 | |
Lambda (L) | 0 | 0 | 73 | 2 | 2 | 70 | 74 | |
Total | 73 | 45 | 74 | 69 | 42 | 81 | 192 | |
\(\:\kappa\:\) value (95% CI), P value | 0.960 (0.925–0.995), P < .001 | 0.880 (0.821–0.939), P < .001 | ||||||
VAH | + | – | + | – | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWI + 3D TOF-MRA | + | 58 | 3 | 60 | 1 | 61 |
– | 3 | 128 | 15 | 116 | 131 | |
\(\:\kappa\:\) value (95% CI), P value | 0.928 (0.871–0.985), P < .001 | 0.819 (0.735–0.903), P < .001 | ||||
Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | 95.1 (86.0-98.9) | 80.0 (69.5–87.6) | ||||
Specificity, % (95% CI) | 97.7 (93.2–99.5) | 99.2 (94.8–100.0) | ||||