Table 7 Scenarios for evaluating the MCI* in rejuvenated recycled asphalt mixtures.
Scenarios | Description | Performance Index | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P(PD1) | P(PD2) | P(PD3) | P(Mr) | P(TSR) | P(NfNM) | P(KIC−12) | P(KIC−24) | ||
1 | Comparison of different permanent deformation methods on MCI* | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
4 | Total performance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
5 | High temperature | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | High temperature + durability | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | High and intermediate temperature | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
8 | High and intermediate temperature + durability | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
9 | High, intermediate, and low temperature (− 12) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
10 | High, intermediate, and low temperature (− 12) + Durability | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
11 | High, intermediate, and low temperature | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
12 | High, intermediate, and low temperature + durability | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
13 | Intermediate and low temperature | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
14 | Intermediate and low temperature + durability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
15 | Intermediate temperature | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
16 | Intermediate temperature + durability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
17 | Comparison between different low temperature parameters on MCI* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
19 | Low temperature | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
20 | Low temperature + durability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
21 | Thickness of pavement (based on AASHTO 1993 [71]) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | Thickness of pavement (based on AASHTO 1993 [71]) + durability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
