Table 7 Peak and valley errors in test results for experiment 2.

From: An efficient parallel runoff forecasting model for capturing global and local feature information

Evaluation indicators

Sites

Sets

Model

PFN

Transformer

BiGRU

Peak

Valley

Peak

Valley

Peak

Valley

EP (%)

Dongjiang Station

1

15.01

0.63

13.29

1.87

4.27

15.37

2

38.28

68.54

40.34

61.06

33.15

63.39

3

37.71

40.89

40.70

34.21

39.65

36.63

4

16.56

61.30

17.59

64.08

17.14

67.31

5

22.60

18.05

22.27

32.01

18.06

62.78

6

32.64

131.54

40.06

139.75

44.95

179.53

7

27.12

43.16

24.33

36.69

13.66

45.53

8

45.27

1.56

49.20

5.27

62.72

37.39

9

8.93

3.12

8.87

3.24

1.31

16.42

10

7.76

1.97

13.35

5.18

12.58

11.70

Quinebaug River

1

21.99

11.53

9.67

47.27

25.71

11.92

2

4.41

16.68

6.02

40.71

11.55

8.66

3

43.28

4.52

49.74

26.08

52.82

0.05

4

25.74

0.42

29.80

3.64

29.06

40.35

5

30.42

16.93

47.06

25.75

41.07

63.47

6

41.48

8.93

61.39

19.25

75.40

46.24

7

19.28

121.95

7.31

181.84

17.84

150.03

8

23.82

172.73

3.40

198.51

33.29

187.68

9

30.60

118.83

0.44

181.11

34.31

159.06

10

39.08

212.69

22.02

259.31

30.88

259.59

11

2.61

195.80

20.41

267.06

2.71

235.28

12

34.81

25.08

16.48

70.12

38.91

41.15

Housatonic River

1

6.52

11.50

9.54

28.91

2.29

32.61

2

3.96

5.93

10.21

17.05

8.34

28.72

3

13.69

3.14

2.34

14.91

33.71

22.94

4

15.66

6.95

23.12

9.22

39.55

30.29

5

23.48

6.79

27.89

33.40

38.93

31.90

6

16.73

6.73

14.53

54.39

34.13

40.55

7

17.41

20.40

6.15

109.48

12.86

75.02

8

19.54

19.86

33.41

130.34

10.92

99.32

9

66.12

21.89

52.86

131.48

52.08

100.90

10

30.48

5.64

3.62

77.30

14.05

50.18

11

15.63

2.29

18.90

60.17

17.40

38.00

12

2.33

6.42

2.43

74.00

23.89

44.64

  1. Significant values are in bold.