Table 4 GEE model$ results evaluating the association of socioeconomic status (SES) on child growth indicators (stunting, underweight, wasting, and obesity) from 2 to 24 months.

From: Maternal socioeconomic status and early childhood growth and nutrition in the PERSIAN Birth Cohort with insights into the double burden of malnutrition

Covariates

Stunting (OR)

95%CI

Underweight(OR)

95%CI

Wasting (OR)

95%CI

Obesity (OR)

95%CI

SES

Very Low SES

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

Low SES

0.937

0.734,1.195

0.875

0.691,1.108

0.878

0.741,1.041

0.953

0.624,1.455

Middle SES

0.834

0.652,1.065

0.818

0.647,1.035

0.814*

0.692,0.958

1.153

0.767,1.732

High SES

0.616***

0.472,0.805

0.751*

0.591,0.956

0.839*

0.706,0.996

0.772

0.502,1.189

Very High SES

0.767

0.585,1.005

0.709**

0.547,0.919

0.781**

0.655,0.932

0.843

0.544,1.306

Child’s age (months)

 

0.956***

0.946,0.966

0.974***

0.966,0.983

  

1.021*

1.002,1.041

Very low SES × child’s age

       

1.000

.,

Low SES × child’s age

       

1.003

0.976,1.031

Middle SES × child’s age

       

0.993

0.966,1.022

High SES × child’s age

       

1.016

0.989,1.045

Very high SES × child’s age

       

1.028*

1.001,1.056

Age

 

1.024**

1.007,1.041

1.032***

1.015,1.050

  

0.997

0.976,1.017

Gravidity

   

0.917*

0.842,0.998

0.973

0.924,1.025

1.002

0.905,1.110

Anxiety and depression

 

0.973

0.692,1.368

    

0.792

0.511,1.228

Chronic diseases

       

0.929

0.763,1.131

Smoking

 

1.383

0.356,5.372

      

Center

Isfahan

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

1.000

.,

Yazd

0.649***

0.518,0.813

0.894

0.736,1.086

2.236***

1.980,2.525

0.585***

0.452,0.756

Rafsanjan

0.956

0.712,1.284

0.894

0.680,1.175

1.096

0.871,1.378

0.998

0.734,1.357

Semnan

1.091

0.853,1.396

0.896

0.698,1.152

1.074

0.879,1.314

1.188

0.916,1.539

  1. $Data is imputed.
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
  3. Covariates included in the GEE model if they changed the SES effect sizes by more than 10%.
  4. Interaction term included in the GEE model if it was statistically significant.
  5. Given that ‘smoking’ resulted in perfect prediction and did not provide additional information, we consider excluding it from the obesity model.
  6. Stunting: HAZ < − 2; Wasting: WHZ < − 2; Underweight: WAZ < − 2; Obesity: BMI-Z > 2.