Table 4 Comparison of similar clinical studies.
Study | Design | Therapy | Sample size | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TORG163023 | Phase II/III | nivolumab + docetaxel | 64 | ORR: 41.8% mPFS: 6.7 m; mOS: 23.1 m |
Wang et al.24 | Phase II | nivolumab + docetaxel | 22 | ORR: 10.0% mPFS: 4.0 m; mOS: 10.0 m |
PROLUNG25 | Phase II | pembrolizumab + docetaxel | 40 | ORR: 42.5% mPFS: 9.5 m |
Zhang et al.26 | Retrospective | pembrolizumab/nivolumab + docetaxel | 33 | ORR: 31.8% mPFS: 7.5 m |
Huang et al.27 | Retrospective | pembrolizumab/nivolumab/Tislelizumab + rh-endostatin | 40 | ORR:20.8% mPFS: 7.1 m |