Table 6 Global results after optimum DG’s placement for Type 2 in 114-bus system.
Parameters | Case 1 (Without DG) | With 2 DG | With 3 DG | With 4 DG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
\(P_{Loss} \left( {kw} \right)\) | 181.3988 | 95.36 | 78.56 | 63.14 |
\(Q_{Loss} \left( {kvar} \right)\) | 111.2838 | 72.35 | 62.32 | 38.98 |
Optimal DG Location (Bus) | – | 33, 17 | 34, 14, 45 | 10, 78, 63, 46 |
\(P_{DG} \left( {kw} \right)\) | – | 1325.32 364.36 | 825.85 1235.21 597.32 | 1325.65 716.12 498.32 1141.65 |
\(Q_{DG} \left( {kvar} \right)\) | – | 956.32 248.63 | 566.55 563.32 365.33 | 788.21 543.12 148.25 876.32 |