Table 1 The study group was divided due to whether the child demonstrated a correct traction test and made eye contact in the third month.

From: The qualitative motor assessment at three months allows a better prognosis than the traction test

 

Correct traction test in the 3rd month - YES

Eye contact - YES

n = 28

Correct traction test in the 3rd month - NO

Eye contact - YES

n = 46

Correct traction test in the 3rd month - NO

Eye contact - NO

n = 33

Chi 2 =;

p=…

OR ANOVA

Fulcrum quadrilateral YES / NO

27/1

35/11

16/17

17,57

< 0.001

Symmetrical support on elbows YES/NO

26/2

18/28

8/25

30,42

< 0.001

Qualitative assessment in supine position, max = 15

12 (8–15); 2–15

6 (2–9); 0–13

2 (0–6); 0–12

35,26

< 0.001

Qualitative assessment in prone position, max = 15

12 (10–15); 0–15

5 (2–8); 0–11

1 (0–6); 0–10

39,54

< 0.001

Age of correct traction (month),

n = 94

3

5 (4–6); 4–10

6 (4–6); 4–12

60,58

< 0.001

Crawling (month),

n = 103

8 (7–9); 6–11

10 (9–11); 7–17

11 (9–12); 7–16

26,66

< 0.001

Sitting down (month),

n = 101

8 (7–9); 6–12

10 (9–11); 8–16

10 (9–12); 7–19

24,86

< 0.001

Walking (month),

n = 100

10 (9–11); 8–16

14 (13–16); 10–26

15 (13–17); 9–21

27,02

< 0.001

  1. The number of children in the subgroups and the significance of the difference using the chi2 test (the p-test value is given), or the median and quartiles, as well as the min-max range, and the significance of the difference using the Kruskal Wallis ANOVA test are given (the value of the H and P test is given). The differences between the first group (YES–YES) and the others were always significant, there was no difference between the NO–YES and NO–NO groups. Not all children achieved the studied milestones, hence the different numbers in the lines.
Back to article page