Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Differences of anterior segment features in fellow eyes of primary angle closure glaucoma and healthy eyes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 January 2026

Differences of anterior segment features in fellow eyes of primary angle closure glaucoma and healthy eyes

  • Liang Guo  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-9059-10281 na1,
  • Yan Wu2 na1,
  • Na Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-0992-93123,
  • Qingyi Liu1,
  • Zhimin Shen1 &
  • …
  • Lu Yang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-93691 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 524 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Pathogenesis
  • Signs and symptoms

Abstract

To compare healthy eyes to the fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure (F-APAC), healthy eyes to the fellow eyes of chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (F-CPACG), and these fellow eyes to each other (F-APAC vs. F-CPACG). This study included patients with PACG (72 eyes) and healthy individuals (22 eyes). Parameters were measured on ultrasound biomicroscopy images, including anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber width (ACW), anterior chamber area (ACA), lens vault (LV), relative position lens vault (RPLV), anterior segment depth (ASD), angle opening distance at 500 μm (AOD500), trabecular iris space area at 500 μm (TISA 500), trabecular iris angle at 500 μm (TIA500), iris thickness at 500 μm (IT500), peripheral iris thickness maximum (PITMAX), iris curvature (IC). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the most important parameters associated with F-APAC compared with F-CPACG. In total, 94 eyes of 94 patients were included. The ACD(P < 0.001), ACW(P < 0.018), ACA(P < 0.001), ASD(P = 0.006), AOD500(P < 0.001), TIA500(P < 0.001) and TISA500(P < 0.001) of the F-APAC were smaller than the healthy, and LV(P < 0.001), RPLV(P < 0.001), IC(P < 0.001) were larger than that. The ACD(P < 0.001), ACA(P < 0.001), ASD(P < 0.001), AOD500(P < 0.001), TISA500(P < 0.001) and TIA500(P < 0.001) of the F-CPACG were smaller than the healthy, and the LV(P < 0.001), RPLV(P < 0.001), PITMAX(P = 0.030), IC(P < 0.001) were larger than that. The LV(P = 0.027), AOD500(P = 0.013), TISA500(P = 0.03), TIA500(P = 0.006), IC(P = 0.48) of F-APAC were larger than F-CPACG, and PITMAX (P = 0.037) was smaller than F-CPACG. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only larger LV was significantly associated with APAC(P = 0.017). LV (AUC, 0.643) performed relatively in distinguishing the F-APAC and the F-CPACG. Anterior shift of the lens and iris bombe promoted the occurrence of APAC, thickening of the peripheral iris played vital roles in CPACG. Additionally, the LV was an important parameter to distinguish APAC or CPACG.

Similar content being viewed by others

Association of peripheral anterior synechiae with anterior segment parameters in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma

Article Open access 06 July 2021

Anterior chamber angle features in primary congenital glaucoma infants using hand-held anterior segment-oct

Article 11 June 2021

Risk factor stratification in early-onset primary angle closure disease

Article 18 July 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Teo, Z. L. et al. Six-Year incidence and risk factors for primary Angle-Closure disease: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Ophthalmology 129 (7), 792–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.03.009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tham, Y. C. et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121 (11), 2081–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jayaram, H., Kolko, M., Friedman, D. S. & Gazzard, G. Glaucoma: now and beyond. Lancet (London England). 402 (10414), 1788–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01289-8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. British J. Ophthalmol. 105 (Suppl 1), 1–169. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines (2021).

  5. Wang, Z., Wiggs, J. L., Aung, T., Khawaja, A. P. & Khor, C. C. The genetic basis for adult onset glaucoma: recent advances and future directions. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 90, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101066 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, S. & Zhong, Y. Differences and similarities between primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-Closure glaucoma. Eye Brain. 16, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S472920 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theinert, C., Wiedemann, P. & Unterlauft, J. D. Laser peripheral iridotomy changes anterior chamber architecture. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 27 (1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000804 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, W., Li, X., Gao, X. & Zhang, X. The anterior and posterior biometric characteristics in primary angle-closure disease: data based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography and swept-source optical coherence tomography. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 69 (4), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_936_20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. You, S. et al. Novel discoveries of anterior segment parameters in fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 62 (14), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.14.6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shabana, N. et al. Quantitative evaluation of anterior chamber parameters using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in primary angle closure mechanisms. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 40 (8), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02805.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F., Wang, D. & Wang, L. Exploring the occurrence mechanisms of acute primary angle closure by comparative analysis of ultrasound biomicroscopic data of the attack and fellow eyes. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 8487907 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8487907 (2020).

  12. Yan, C., Yu, Y., Wang, W., Han, Y. & Yao, K. Long-term effects of mild cataract extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy on anterior chamber morphology in primary angle-closure suspect eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 108 (6), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-322698 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gao, X. et al. Predictive equation for angle opening distance at 750µm after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects. Front. Med. 8, 715747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.715747 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, L. et al. Anterior segment features in neovascular glaucoma: an ultrasound biomicroscopy study. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 11206721241252476 https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241252476 (2024).

  15. Xie, Q. et al. Anterior segment OCT in primary angle closure disease compared with normal subjects with similar shallow anterior chamber. J. Glaucoma. 31 (2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001915 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loo, Y. et al. Association of peripheral anterior synechiae with anterior segment parameters in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 13906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93293-7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Senthilkumar, V. A., Pradhan, C., Rajendrababu, S., Krishnadas, R. & Mani, I. Comparison of uveal parameters between acute primary angle-closure eyes and fellow eyes in South Indian population. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 70 (4), 1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1561_21 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, B. et al. Analyzing anatomical factors contributing to angle closure based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging. Curr. Eye Res. 47 (2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2021.1978098 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, B. Y. et al. Ocular biometric risk factors for progression of primary angle closure disease: the Zhongshan angle closure prevention trial. Ophthalmology 129 (3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.10.003 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panda, S. K. et al. Changes in Iris stiffness and permeability in primary angle closure glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 62 (13), 29. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.13.29 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshimizu, S., Hirose, F., Takagi, S., Fujihara, M. & Kurimoto, Y. Comparison of pretreatment measurements of anterior segment parameters in eyes with acute and chronic primary angle closure. Jpn J. Ophthalmol. 63 (2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-019-00651-0 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guzman, C. P. et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters in subtypes of primary angle closure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (8), 5281–5286. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12285 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quigley, H. A., Friedman, D. S. & Congdon, N. G. Possible mechanisms of primary angle-closure and malignant glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 12 (2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200304000-00013 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allam, R. S., Raafat, K. A. & Elmohsen, M. N. A. Nasal trabeculo-ciliary angle and relative lens vault as predictors for intraocular pressure reduction following phacoemulsification. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 32 (5), 3019–3028. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721211055033 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. He, M. et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London England). 393 (10181), 1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32607-2 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, H. J., Wang, X., Yan, Y. J. & Wu, L. L. Postiridotomy ultrasound biomicroscopy features in the fellow eye of Chinese patients with acute primary angle-closure and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 24 (3), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000086 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, B. S. et al. Increased Iris thickness and association with primary angle closure glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 95 (1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.178129 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Liang Guo and Yan Wu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jiangxi Medical College, The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    Liang Guo, Qingyi Liu, Zhimin Shen & Lu Yang

  2. The Second People ’s Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China

    Yan Wu

  3. Jiangxi Medical College, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    Na Wang

Authors
  1. Liang Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Na Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingyi Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhimin Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lu Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Liang Guo, Yan Wu, Na Wang, Qingyi Liu, Zhimin Shen, and Lu Yang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Liang Guo, Yan Wu and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, L., Wu, Y., Wang, N. et al. Differences of anterior segment features in fellow eyes of primary angle closure glaucoma and healthy eyes. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35075-7

Download citation

  • Received: 02 March 2025

  • Accepted: 02 January 2026

  • Published: 13 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35075-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Primary angle-closure glaucoma
  • Fellow eye
  • Anterior segment
  • Ultrasound biomicroscopy
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing