Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 interferes with the repressive activity of forkhead box O1 towards CYP4A11 that mediates lipid accumulation in the liver
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 January 2026

Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 interferes with the repressive activity of forkhead box O1 towards CYP4A11 that mediates lipid accumulation in the liver

  • Masanobu Kimura1,
  • Yuriko Saiki1,
  • Kosei Iwata1,
  • Keigo Murakami1 &
  • …
  • Toru Furukawa1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 659 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell biology
  • Diseases
  • Molecular biology

Abstract

Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) is a phosphatase specific for extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Dusp6-knockout mice are resistant to diet-induced hepatic steatosis, which appears to be linked to the downregulation of cytochrome P450 4 A (CYP4A); however, its mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate how DUSP6 regulates CYP4A11 in human hepatocyte-lineage cells by focusing on forkhead box O1 (FOXO1). HepG2 and HuH-7 cells were challenged with palmitic acid and oleic acid to induce lipid accumulation while manipulating the expression of DUSP6, FOXO1, CYP4A11, ERK, and/or AKT. Lipid accumulation was reduced by DUSP6 knockdown, resulting in decreased CYP4A11 expression despite elevated phosphorylated ERK, AKT, and FOXO1. Inhibition of ERK increased lipid accumulation, while simultaneous inhibition of ERK and AKT decreased it. Knockdown of FOXO1 or induced expression of DUSP6 increased CYP4A11 expression and lipid accumulation, whereas induced expression of FOXO1 decreased them. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation showed that FOXO1 bound to CYP4A11 promoter. Immunoprecipitations revealed that DUSP6 bound to and anchored FOXO1 in the cytoplasm. These results indicate that DUSP6 interferes with FOXO1’s repressive activity towards CYP4A11 by sequestering it in the cytoplasm and preventing its nuclear translocation, which ultimately unleashes CYP4A11 and promotes lipid accumulation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Hepatocyte phosphatase DUSP22 mitigates NASH-HCC progression by targeting FAK

Article Open access 08 October 2022

Branched-chain amino acids promote hepatic Cyp7a1 expression and bile acid synthesis via suppressing FGF21-ERK pathway

Article 20 November 2024

Tctp regulates the level and localization of Foxo for cell growth in Drosophila

Article Open access 31 March 2022

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lang, R., Hammer, M. & Mages, J. DUSP Meet immunology: dual specificity MAPK phosphatases in control of the inflammatory response. J. Immunol. 177, 7497–7504. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7497 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muda, M. et al. MKP-3, a novel cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatase that exemplifies a new class of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4319–4326 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Furukawa, T., Tanji, E., Xu, S. & Horii, A. Feedback regulation of DUSP6 transcription responding to MAPK1 via ETS2 in human cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 377, 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.003 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Furukawa, T., Sunamura, M., Motoi, F., Matsuno, S. & Horii, A. Potential tumor suppressive pathway involving DUSP6/MKP-3 in pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 1807–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64315-5 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, D. W. et al. Loss of MKP3 mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 29, 1742–1750. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgn167 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Okudela, K. et al. Down-regulation of DUSP6 expression in lung cancer: its mechanism and potential role in carcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 175, 867–881. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2009.080489 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, X. et al. Utility of patient-derived xenografts to evaluate drug sensitivity and select optimal treatments for individual non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Mol. Med. 30, 209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-024-00934-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Png, C. W. et al. DUSP6 regulates Notch1 signalling in colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 15, 10087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54383-y (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, B. et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 3 (MKP-3)-deficient mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 63, 2924–2934. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0066 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, R. et al. Mice lacking DUSP6/8 have enhanced ERK1/2 activity and resistance to diet-induced obesity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 533, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.08.106 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pfuhlmann, K. et al. Dual specificity phosphatase 6 deficiency is associated with impaired systemic glucose tolerance and reversible weight retardation in mice. PLoS One. 12, e0183488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183488 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, C. et al. Ablation of Dual-Specificity phosphatase 6 protects against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via cytochrome P450 4A and Mitogen-Activated protein kinase. Am. J. Pathol. 193, 1988–2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.09.003 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Powell, P. K., Wolf, I. & Lasker, J. M. Identification of CYP4A11 as the major lauric acid omega-hydroxylase in human liver microsomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 335, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1996.0501 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, A. L., Edson, K. Z., Totah, R. A. & Rettie, A. E. Cytochrome P450 omega-Hydroxylases in inflammation and cancer. Adv. Pharmacol. 74, 223–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2015.05.002 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galili, N. et al. Fusion of a fork head domain gene to PAX3 in the solid tumour alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat. Genet. 5, 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1193-230 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xing, Y. Q. et al. The regulation of FOXO1 and its role in disease progression. Life Sci. 193, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2017.11.030 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Behl, T. et al. Exploring the genetic conception of obesity via the dual role of FoxO. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063179 (2021).

  18. Li, T. et al. Forkhead box transcription factor O1 inhibits cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase in human hepatocytes and in high fat diet-fed mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1791, 991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.05.004 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tang, L. et al. FOXO1-regulated LncRNA CYP1B1-AS1 suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting neddylation. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 202, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07090-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, J. et al. Eicosatrienoic acid inhibits estradiol synthesis through the CD36/FOXO1/CYP19A1 signaling pathway to improve PCOS in mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 229, 116517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116517 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Konstandi, M., Cheng, J. & Gonzalez, F. J. Sex steroid hormones regulate constitutive expression of Cyp2e1 in female mouse liver. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 304, E1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00585.2012 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duan, S. et al. Loss of FBXO31-mediated degradation of DUSP6 dysregulates ERK and PI3K-AKT signaling and promotes prostate tumorigenesis. Cell. Rep. 37, 109870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109870 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stulpinas, A. et al. Crosstalk between protein kinases AKT and ERK1/2 in human lung tumor-derived cell models. Front. Oncol. 12, 1045521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1045521 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dent, P. Crosstalk between ERK, AKT, and cell survival. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 245–246. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.27541 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dumaz, N. & Marais, R. Raf phosphorylation: one step forward and two steps back. Mol. Cell. 17, 164–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.01.001 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, Z. et al. MAPK phosphatase-3 promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis through dephosphorylation of forkhead box O1 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 3901–3911. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43250 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuzaki, H., Daitoku, H., Hatta, M., Tanaka, K. & Fukamizu, A. Insulin-induced phosphorylation of FKHR (Foxo1) targets to proteasomal degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 100, 11285–11290. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934283100 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, H. et al. Skp2 inhibits FOXO1 in tumor suppression through ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 102, 1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406789102 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, S. et al. Phosphorylation of Serine 256 by protein kinase B disrupts transactivation by FKHR and mediates effects of insulin on insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter activity through a conserved insulin response sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17184–17192. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.24.17184 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Basaranoglu, M., Basaranoglu, G. & Senturk, H. From fatty liver to fibrosis: a Tale of second hit. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 1158–1165. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i8.1158 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Robertson, G., Leclercq, I. & Farrell, G. C. Nonalcoholic steatosis and steatohepatitis. II. Cytochrome P-450 enzymes and oxidative stress. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 281, G1135–1139. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.5.G1135 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arif Asghar, M. et al. NRF2 pathway activation as a molecular toxicology mechanism in oxidative stress and lipid metabolic disorders. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 39, e70633. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.70633 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kohjima, M. et al. Re-evaluation of fatty acid metabolism-related gene expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Med. 20, 351–358 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gao, H., Cao, Y., Xia, H., Zhu, X. & Jin, Y. CYP4A11 is involved in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via ROS–induced lipid peroxidation and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 45, 1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4479 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ni, K. D. & Liu, J. Y. The functions of cytochrome P450 omega-hydroxylases and the associated eicosanoids in Inflammation-Related diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 716801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.716801 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hoopes, S. L., Garcia, V., Edin, M. L., Schwartzman, M. L. & Zeldin, D. C. Vascular actions of 20-HETE. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 120, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2015.03.002 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tsai, I. J., Croft, K. D., Puddey, I. B., Beilin, L. J. & Barden, A. 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid synthesis is increased in human neutrophils and platelets by angiotensin II and endothelin-1. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 300, H1194–1200. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00733.2010 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hardwick, J. P. Cytochrome P450 Omega hydroxylase (CYP4) function in fatty acid metabolism and metabolic diseases. Biochem. Pharmacol. 75, 2263–2275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2008.03.004 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng, J. et al. FOXO1 induced fatty acid oxidation in hepatic cells by targeting ALDH1L2. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 39, 2197–2207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16662 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Guo, L. et al. Similarities and differences in the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes between human hepatic cell lines and primary human hepatocytes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 39, 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.110.035873 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arzumanian, V., Pyatnitskiy, M. & Poverennaya, E. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of three common liver cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108791 (2023).

  42. Huggett, Z. J. et al. A comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines to model the effects of fatty Acids, Fructose and glucose on liver cell lipid accumulation. Nutrients 15 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15010040 (2022).

  43. Arzumanian, V. A., Timofeeva, E. V., Kiseleva, O. I. & Poverennaya, E. V. Drug-Metabolizing gene expression identity: comparison across liver tissues and model cell lines. Biomedicines 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112722 (2025).

  44. Yang, L. et al. RING finger protein 4 (RNF4) reduces nonalcoholic fatty liver disease accumulation by promoting the sumoylation of HIF-2alpha and regulating the PPARalpha signaling pathway. IUBMB Life. 77, e70047. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.70047 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, Y. et al. The ErChen Decoction and its active compounds ameliorate Non-Alcoholic fatty liver disease through activation of the AMPK signaling pathway. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 18 https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111707 (2025).

  46. Schicht, G., Seidemann, L., Haensel, R., Seehofer, D. & Damm, G. Critical investigation of the usability of hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Huh7 as models for the metabolic representation of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174227 (2022).

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP23K06477 to YS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-0875, Japan

    Masanobu Kimura, Yuriko Saiki, Kosei Iwata, Keigo Murakami & Toru Furukawa

Authors
  1. Masanobu Kimura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuriko Saiki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kosei Iwata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keigo Murakami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toru Furukawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Masanobu Kimura: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-Original draft preparation. Yuriko Saiki: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - Review & Editing. Kosei Iwata: Investigation. Keigo Murakami: Investigation. Toru Furukawa: Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuriko Saiki or Toru Furukawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimura, M., Saiki, Y., Iwata, K. et al. Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 interferes with the repressive activity of forkhead box O1 towards CYP4A11 that mediates lipid accumulation in the liver. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35118-z

Download citation

  • Received: 10 September 2025

  • Accepted: 02 January 2026

  • Published: 07 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35118-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Lipids in Cell Biology

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing