Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Derivation of an intrinsic brain activity biomarker for the earliest prediction of cognitive decline
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 January 2026

Derivation of an intrinsic brain activity biomarker for the earliest prediction of cognitive decline

  • Leslie S. Prichep1,2,
  • Syed N. Zaidi1,
  • Kara Brink1,
  • Saloni Kanakia1,
  • Bo Liang1,
  • Yang Jiang3,4 &
  • …
  • Ruben Armañanzas5,6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 636 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ageing
  • Biomarkers
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Early identification of cognitive decline in the elderly is essential for timely and effective intervention. Current neuroimaging and clinical biomarkers have largely focused on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementias, and though effective, have not been demonstrated to be sensitive to the earliest signs of functional abnormalities. The electroencephalogram (EEG), with a millisecond time base, allows a precise exploration of synaptic dysfunction even at the initial stages of the damage. This study introduces a novel non-invasive EEG-based biomarker to predict cognitive decline of participants showing only subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). Baseline EEG recordings from 88 SCI participants who had yearly assessment of cognitive changes and staging for 5–7 years were included for study. Quantitative EEG (qEEG) features were calculated from eyes closed resting surface EEG, including those reflecting broad band power spectra, connectivity, and complexity. Machine learning (ML) classifiers were trained on the qEEG features to estimate the likelihood of future progression to MCI or dementia. A feature selection pipeline optimized predictive accuracy of the ML algorithms while reducing the number of features. Prediction performance for the biomarker was over 80% in accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.90. Independent validation on two external cohorts confirmed the biomarker’s robustness. Dominant contributors to the final locked models aligned with existing literature on neurodegenerative disorders. Features contributing most were those reflecting disruption in neuronal transmission (phase lag and asymmetry) with abnormalities in the alpha and theta frequency bands. Changes in measures of connectivity in the subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) population provide evidence of changes in neuronal transmission within frontal networks. These findings suggest that these EEG-based brain activity biomarkers are reflective of the earliest signs of brain dysfunction. The qEEG features contributing to the biomarkers reflect the underlying physiological mechanisms related to neurodegeneration. Furthermore, the non-invasive and cost-effective nature of EEG makes it a promising tool for clinical implementation, allowing for early risk assessment, disease monitoring, and intervention planning.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available under the signed data use agreements. Additional information may be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Gauthier, S., Rosa-Neto, P., Morais, J. A. & Webster, C. World Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey Through the Diagnosis of Dementia (Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2021).

  2. Babiloni, C. et al. Hippocampal volume and cortical sources of EEG alpha rhythms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. NeuroImage 44(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.005 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silva-Spínola, A. et al. Blood biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment patients: Relationship between analytes and progression to Alzheimer disease dementia. Eur. J. Neurol. 30(6), 1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15762 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nallapu, B. T., Petersen, K. K., Lipton, R. B., Davatzikos, C. & Ezzati, A. Plasma biomarkers as predictors of progression to dementia in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis. 98(1), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230620 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grueso, S. & Viejo-Sobera, R. Machine learning methods for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease dementia: A systematic review. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 13(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00900-w (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rossini, P. M. et al. Neurophysiological hallmarks of neurodegenerative cognitive decline: The study of brain connectivity as A biomarker of early dementia. J. Personalized Med. 10(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10020034 (2020a).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bazarian, J. J. et al. Validation of a machine learning brain electrical activity–based index to aid in diagnosing concussion among athletes. JAMA Netw. Open 4(2), e2037349. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37349 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanley, D. et al. Emergency department triage of traumatic head injury using brain electrical activity biomarkers: A multisite prospective observational validation trial. Acad. Emerg. Med. 24(5), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13175 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Livint Popa, L., Dragos, H., Pantelemon, C., Verisezan Rosu, O. & Strilciuc, S. The role of quantitative EEG in the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders. J. Med. Life 13(1), 8–15 https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0085 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Babiloni, C. et al. Resting state cortical electroencephalographic rhythms are related to Gray matter volume in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34(6), 1427–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22005 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brueggen, K. et al. Early changes in alpha band power and DMN BOLD activity in Alzheimer’s disease: A simultaneous resting state EEG-fMRI study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00319 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Höller, Y. et al. Combining SPECT and quantitative EEG analysis for the automated differential diagnosis of disorders with amnestic symptoms. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00290 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moretti, D. V. et al. Specific EEG changes associated with atrophy of hippocampus in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 253153. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/253153 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moretti, D. V., Prestia, A., Binetti, G., Zanetti, O. & Frisoni, G. B. Increase of theta frequency is associated with reduction in regional cerebral blood flow only in subjects with mild cognitive impairment with higher upper alpha/low alpha EEG frequency power ratio. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00188 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moretti, D. V. Theta and alpha EEG frequency interplay in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: Evidence from EEG, MRI, and SPECT brain modifications. FrontAging Neurosci. 20, 7:31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00031 (2015a).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moretti, D. V. Conversion of mild cognitive impairment patients in Alzheimer’s disease: Prognostic value of Alpha3/Alpha2 electroencephalographic rhythms power ratio. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 7, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0162-x (2015b).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moretti, D. V. et al. Cerebral PET glucose hypometabolism in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and higher EEG high-alpha/low-alpha frequency power ratio. Neurobiol. Aging 58, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.009 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rossini, P. M. et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: The role of biomarkers including advanced EEG signals analysis. Report from the IFCN-sponsored panel of experts. Clin. Neurophysiol. 131(6), 1287–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.03.003 (2020b).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gaubert, S. et al. EEG evidence of compensatory mechanisms in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 142(7), 2096–2112. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz150 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Poil, S. S. et al. Integrative EEG biomarkers predict progression to Alzheimer’s disease at the MCI stage. Front. Aging Neurosci. 5, 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00058 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lizio, R. et al. Neurophysiological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease individuals by a single electroencephalographic marker. J. Alzheimers Dis. 49(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-143042 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prichep, L. S. et al. Prediction of longitudinal cognitive decline in normal elderly with subjective complaints using electrophysiological imaging. Neurobiol. Aging 27 (3), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.07.021 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rossini, P. M., Miraglia, F. & Vecchio, F. Early dementia diagnosis, MCI-to-dementia risk prediction, and the role of machine learning methods for feature extraction from integrated biomarkers, in particular for EEG signal analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 18(12), 2699–2706. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12645 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yener, G. et al. Treatment effects on event-related EEG potentials and oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 177, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.008 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang, Y. et al. Parallel electrophysiological abnormalities due to COVID-19 infection and to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia. Alzheimer’s Dement. 20, 7296–7319. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14089 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reisberg, B. et al. The pre-mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive impairment stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Dement. 4 (1), S98–S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2007.11.017 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J. & Crook, T. Global deterioration scale (GDS). Psychopharmacol. Bull. 24(4), 661–663 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reisberg, B. & Ferris, S. H. Global deterioration scale (GDS), brief cognitive rating scale (BCRS) and functional assessment staging (FAST) measures: The GDS staging system. In American Psychiatric Association, editor. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, 450–5 (American Psychiatric Association Task Force for the Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, Washington, 2000).

  29. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr Res. 12(3), 189–198 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shokouhi, S. & Albert, K. Subjective cognitive decline and biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 6, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-019-00191-4 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prichep, L. S. et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury severity using informed data reduction in a series of binary classifier algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil Eng. 20(6), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206609 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jacquin, A., Kanakia, S., Oberly, D. & Prichep, L. A multimodal biomarker for concussion identification, prognosis and management. Comput. Biol. Med. 102, 95–103 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. Improvements on cross-validation: the 632 + bootstrap method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92(438), 548–560 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang, Y. et al. Memory-related frontal brainwaves predict transition to mild cognitive impairment in cognitively intact older individuals five years before diagnosis. J. Alzheimers Dis. 79(2), pp. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200931 (2021). https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-Alzheimers-disease/jad200931

    Google Scholar 

  35. Engedal, K. et al. The power of EEG to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline to dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 49(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508392 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vecchio, F. et al. Sustainable method for Alzheimer’s prediction in mild cognitive impairment: EEG connectivity and graph theory combined with ApoE. Ann. Neurol. 84(2), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25289 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Babiloni, C. et al. Enriched Resting-State EEG biomarkers predict cognitive decline at 1-Year Follow-Up in old patients with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: A combined Machine-Learning approach. SSRN Appeared Online January. 29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4679495 (2024).

  38. Lee, L. Y. et al. August. Robust and interpretable AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction in real-world clinical settings. eClinicalMedicine 74, 102725 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102725

    Google Scholar 

  39. Höller, Y. et al. Prediction of cognitive decline in Temporal lobe epilepsy and mild cognitive impairment by EEG, MRI, and neuropsychology. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 8915961. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8915961 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The NYU cohort was shared under a license agreement between NYU and BrainScope Company. The authors wish to acknowledge the past collaboration with the Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center at NYU School of Medicine where all clinical staging of the NYU cohort was collected under the direction of Dr. Barry Reisberg and Dr. Steven Ferris. Dr. Prichep wishes to acknowledge the original funding sources of the NYU School of Medicine database which was supported in part by NIH grants AG03051 and AG08051 from the National Institute of Aging and MH32577 from the National Institute of Mental Health, MO1 RR00096. We also acknowledge the technicians at the Brain Research Laboratories, NYUSOM, where the EEGs of the cohort were originally acquired. We gratefully acknowledge the participants and their families for their dedication to this longitudinal study. We also acknowledge Dr. Jiang (University of Kentucky) and Dr. Rossini (Neuroconnect) for the independent validation cohorts shared under a data use agreement with BrainScope Company. Dr Jiang acknowledges the funding sources for the UKY shared data from NIH K01AG000986, P50AG05144, R56AG060608-01 and P30AG072946, and by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department of Energy DE-AC05-00OR22725.

Funding

This work was funded by the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), # GC-202202-2022659.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BrainScope Company, Rockville, MD, 20855, USA

    Leslie S. Prichep, Syed N. Zaidi, Kara Brink, Saloni Kanakia & Bo Liang

  2. Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Leslie S. Prichep

  3. Aging Brain and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Yang Jiang

  4. Sanders Brown Center on Aging, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Yang Jiang

  5. Institute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DATAI), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

    Ruben Armañanzas

  6. TECNUN School of Engineering, Universidad de Navarra, San Sebastian, Spain

    Ruben Armañanzas

Authors
  1. Leslie S. Prichep
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syed N. Zaidi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kara Brink
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saloni Kanakia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bo Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ruben Armañanzas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors reviewed the manuscript. L.P. and R.A.: Conception, and design of work, interpretation of data, draft of manuscript. S.Z., S.K. and B.L.: Analysis of data. S.Z. and R.A.: Creation of new software. K.B. and Y.J. : Draft and revision of manuscript. Y.J: Acquisition of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie S. Prichep.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Drs. Prichep, Zaidi, Liang and Ms. Kanakia were employees of BrainScope during the data analysis phase of this study. Drs. Brink and Armañanzas were consultant/advisors to BrainScope during the data analysis phase of this study. Data was collected through license and data use agreements with independent institutions. Dr. Jiang has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Leslie S. Prichep is retired.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prichep, L.S., Zaidi, S.N., Brink, K. et al. Derivation of an intrinsic brain activity biomarker for the earliest prediction of cognitive decline. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35144-x

Download citation

  • Received: 27 May 2025

  • Accepted: 02 January 2026

  • Published: 22 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35144-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research